- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Nurse who injected 8,600 patients with saline instead of Covid vaccine gets probation
Posted on 12/1/22 at 7:15 pm to Smeg
Posted on 12/1/22 at 7:15 pm to Smeg
quote:
So your opinion is that even if it's proven she saved many lives, she's still a horrible person
My suspicion about you not having the mental capacity to understand this situation is 100% confirmed
1
Posted on 12/1/22 at 7:16 pm to Powerman
quote:
My suspicion about you not having the mental capacity to understand this situation is 100% confirmed
My suspicion that you are more concerned about obedience, even at the expense of human lives, is 100% confirmed.
Posted on 12/1/22 at 7:17 pm to Major Dutch Schaefer
Thank you for your service lady. They should never have been mandated.
Posted on 12/1/22 at 7:18 pm to Powerman
quote:
If you're celebrating this person you are both a moron and a piece of shite
You know why she only got probation? Because big pharma and everyone on that gravy train got the same money either way. No harm no foul.
Posted on 12/1/22 at 7:21 pm to Major Dutch Schaefer
how many of them died because of COVID?? = I didn't see that in the article.
Seems like a good reference point - although not a recommended way of doing things.
But if the results were valid, or informative, why not use them>??
I am wagering that the death rate for those effected was not materially different than those who got the real jab
Seems like a good reference point - although not a recommended way of doing things.
But if the results were valid, or informative, why not use them>??
I am wagering that the death rate for those effected was not materially different than those who got the real jab
Posted on 12/1/22 at 7:21 pm to RogerTheShrubber
quote:
PoS.
Deceiving people, regardless of belief is the wrong way to carry your message.
Of course. Not surprisingly the plentiful group of morons here think she is a hero. It's embarrassing
Posted on 12/1/22 at 7:22 pm to RogerTheShrubber
quote:
Deceiving people, regardless of belief is the wrong way to carry your message
agreed -
but what were the results??
Posted on 12/1/22 at 7:23 pm to ChineseBandit58
quote:
but what were the results??
Impossible to prove and an irrelevant consideration when evaluating her character
Posted on 12/1/22 at 7:23 pm to Powerman
quote:
Not surprisingly the plentiful group of morons here think she is a hero.
That remains to be seen. It may or may not be true.
But you've gone on record saying that even if she saved plenty lives you wouldn't change your opinion.
Posted on 12/1/22 at 7:28 pm to Smeg
quote:
But you've gone on record saying that even if she saved plenty lives you wouldn't change your opinion.
Yes because there is a 0 percent chance she could have known she was doing that
It would be dumb luck and there are plenty of studies that indicate the vaccine has saved lives. She denied the vaccine to thousands of elderly people without their consent. That is disgusting behavior and the fact that I need to explain this to to you should be a source of personal embarrassment for you. But you're probably dumb enough to have any sort of self awareness so there is that
Posted on 12/1/22 at 7:29 pm to Powerman
quote:a hero
If you're celebrating this person you are both a moron and a piece of shite
Posted on 12/1/22 at 7:32 pm to Powerman
quote:
The decision was made by the people seeking the vaccine and they were not given what they asked for.
Was that the case?
Link?
Posted on 12/1/22 at 7:33 pm to Powerman
quote:
Presumably some people were harmed by her actions but to prove that in a court of law is essentially impossible
Without documented evidence we could presume her actions helped some people too.
Without proof of harm, as charged in a court of law, it appears probation is an acceptable punishment.
We wouldn't want over zealous prosecutors over charging the nurse, would we?
Maybe Mr. Soros has funded this prosecutors most recent election in Germany?
I thought progressives liked criminals getting minimal charges and to be let out on recognizance as opposed to extreme bail costs?
Posted on 12/1/22 at 7:34 pm to JJJimmyJimJames
a hero
Posted on 12/1/22 at 7:34 pm to Herooftheday
quote:
You know why she only got probation? Because big pharma and everyone on that gravy train got the same money either way. No harm no foul.
Sadly, this is plausible.
Posted on 12/1/22 at 7:36 pm to Powerman
quote:
irrelevant consideration when evaluating her character
didn't imply otherwise - in fact specifically addressed it.
but still - would not the results be valuable?? or would that bit of 'data' be subject to the motives of the person who did the deed??
btw - did we make any use of the 'experiments' run by Nazi's?? like rocketry??
Posted on 12/1/22 at 7:36 pm to Powerman
quote:
Yes because there is a 0 percent chance she could have known she was doing that
I'm interested in saving the most lives. If she saved lives, even by "dumb luck", she could be a hero.
Posted on 12/1/22 at 7:37 pm to Powerman
Your lack of self awareness is astounding
Posted on 12/1/22 at 7:39 pm to Powerman
quote:
should be a source of personal embarrassment for you
no - you're deliberately making an argument based on items stipulated to be not part of the argument.
You are a disgrace
Posted on 12/1/22 at 7:42 pm to Powerman
Powerman still trusts the WHO and CDC and Biden Adminstration. What a fricking retard 
Page 4 of 24
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News