re: NSFW Language: Two woman, one a muslim the other Black, have a difference of opinion

quote:

---

Interesting. I expected to see weaves a shite flying.

---

In that situation, you gotta hijab and weave.

Hold on a minute. You’re telling us that the religion of peace kid assaulted a black kid & Mama didn’t act out like some fast food place forgot to supersize her fries & charged her extra for bbq sauce?

Frankly, I expected far worse

quote:

---

No, the urban ghetto culcha in effect now its roots in the 1960s when the GOV took over the family and created a dependent mind set.

---

Welfare just took advantage of a mindset that already existed but wasn’t allowed to fester prior. African nations are poor because if anyone builds a successful business they are culturally expected to take care of everyone around them. If they refuse, they are shunned and it’s ok to steal from him. So it’s impossible to make money there. The only business is from foreigners. You see that similar mindset here.

Blacks as a group can thrive if surrounded by other civilized races that do not tolerate that behavior nor enable it. But it requires what is viewed as oppression by them. When given full freedom, they seek to destroy not create. (As a group, not all individuals). People can call this racist, but it’s factual. Whenever they gain power as a group over something whether it be a city, institution, country, whatever does it improve or go downhill? Is it run ethically and responsibly or full of theft, corruption and fraud?

Arab looping

As a caveat, I lived and worked in the MS Delta region a few decades ago. My main point in this thread is that the current - whatever you wish to call it - say ghetto 'culcha' now in the US is a result of GOV programs that began in the 1960's to create a dependent state. I have worked and interacted with a number of folks from various countries in Africa and from those experiences I would absolutely be opposed to any suggestion that people from countries within the African continent are compromised by 'genetics' or a mindset, as has been suggested on this thread.

The bottom line here is with black folks in the US - and by no means not all - but a large proportion of the US Black culture has devolved to culcha since the 1960's. And that was totally due to LBJ's policies which have been continued to be embraced by libs today. Trying to blame it on genetics as Alisa did is pure racism. Obviously, the poster Alisa has never interacted with African folks (not the buzz term 'African Americans'). And as such that is a showcase of Dem values - keep the population down and call everyone racist that do not agree. Yet the poster Alisa brought up genetics. I would wager that the African folks I have interacted with over the years have a higher IQ.

I have a feeling that once the pew pew starts it won't be turned off easily.

quote:

---

Could be billed as the Burka v Twerka in Chicongo.

---

That was awesome. I needed that laugh today. Thanks Boot!

She would have attacked but with the Muslims you have to be aware that a truck bed full of isis might be waiting around the block.

Blacks > Arabs

quote:

---

Just a bunch of low IQ savages. Let them destroy each other.

---

I don’t know man. I see this as a good thing. I see an opportunity for unity.

This is where I should have stopped.

Don’t get me wrong- I hate low IQ culture of all varieties. I absolutely abhor ghetto culture. But that’s a different discussion. This one is about identifying and eliminating the greater of two evils.

If we “let them fight,” the Muslims will win, they will absorb the conquered, and unify them against Christianity- which is the heartbeat of this nation. Most American blacks believe the democrats are championing their cause. This is a perfect opportunity (that we should lean into) to show the black community what they are really voting for when the vote for a democrat. The kicker is that we then have to provide a better option- which is where the Republican Party consistently fails.