Started By
Message

re: Not a Single Protestant on the Court

Posted on 7/2/18 at 4:22 pm to
Posted by FooManChoo
Member since Dec 2012
41648 posts
Posted on 7/2/18 at 4:22 pm to
quote:

And you know this how?
Because the god that is described in the Qur'an is not the same God that is described in the Bible. Saying they are the same is false if you're describing two completely different things.

It's like saying you and your neighbor drive the same kind of car and then go on to describe a '07 Toyota Prius vs a '69 Ford Mustang. Saying they are the same doesn't make them so.

quote:

You embarrass yourself and your family.
I'm not embarrassed by the truth.
Posted by Seldom Seen
Member since Feb 2016
39990 posts
Posted on 7/2/18 at 4:22 pm to
The whole lifetime appointment thing is what bothers me most about the court.
Posted by KiwiHead
Auckland, NZ
Member since Jul 2014
27374 posts
Posted on 7/2/18 at 4:37 pm to
since you are going the route, most Protestants are heretics and therefore wrong about Christianity, if they are wrong about Christianity.....ehhhh.....why take a chance with the law and the Constitution


The Jews are the Chosen People as such, really cannot be wrong

Geez.....worrying about religion. I would be more worried that they all went to the same schools. Harvard, Yale, Princeton
Posted by memphis tiger
Memphis, TN
Member since Feb 2006
20720 posts
Posted on 7/2/18 at 4:43 pm to
quote:


Does this not bother anyone



Why does that matter?

I don’t care if they are all Jewish, all catholic or all worship at the church of the Flying Spaghetti Monster. Why should you.
Posted by Muleriderhog
NYC
Member since Jan 2015
3116 posts
Posted on 7/2/18 at 4:47 pm to
I'd prefer if all the judges were non religious but that wont happen. The less religous a judge is, the better.
Posted by GeauxxxTigers23
TeamBunt General Manager
Member since Apr 2013
62514 posts
Posted on 7/2/18 at 4:47 pm to
quote:

I've honestly never even considered their religion or denomination
so should race and sex
Posted by Champagne
Already Conquered USA.
Member since Oct 2007
48272 posts
Posted on 7/2/18 at 4:52 pm to
I didn't know that there were no Protestants on the court.

Yes, I agree with you that Trump should take this into consideration and I would have no problem with having a practicing Protestant as a SCOTUS Justice.
Posted by Parmen
Member since Apr 2016
18317 posts
Posted on 7/2/18 at 4:53 pm to
quote:

Does this not bother anyone? Every Christian on the court is a Catholic


As a Catholic, does not bother me at all.
Posted by Parmen
Member since Apr 2016
18317 posts
Posted on 7/2/18 at 4:56 pm to
quote:

By the way, Jews are vastly over-represented. 2% of the US population yet 33% of the court. If Garland would have been appointed, that would make 4 Jews or almost half the court (his mom was a Jew, which makes him a Jew by Jewish law). I know Jews are some clever little dickens who are especially good at law, but god damn they are taking over. It gives the goldenuggets of the world ammo.


Whoa, calm down David Duke.
Posted by TexasTiger80
Texas
Member since Apr 2018
2396 posts
Posted on 7/2/18 at 5:06 pm to
quote:

You do know Catholics and Protestants both accept Jesus, and along with Jews believe in the same God. Right?


Take a trip down the rabbit hole baw.
Posted by John Gotti
Vestavia HIlls, AL
Member since Jul 2013
3370 posts
Posted on 7/2/18 at 5:12 pm to
There’s no disputing that Islam comes from the line of Ishmael.
Posted by FooManChoo
Member since Dec 2012
41648 posts
Posted on 7/2/18 at 5:20 pm to
quote:

There’s no disputing that Islam comes from the line of Ishmael.
Islam as a religion sprung from from the loins of a war lord pedophile in the 6th century. Regardless of whether or not the blood line went back to Abraham, the god described in the Qu'ran is very different from the God in the Bible and therefore cannot be the same being, regardless of the claims to the contrary.
Posted by moneyg
Member since Jun 2006
56396 posts
Posted on 7/2/18 at 5:24 pm to
quote:

The Constitution is ALL that matters


This
Posted by Champagne
Already Conquered USA.
Member since Oct 2007
48272 posts
Posted on 7/2/18 at 5:26 pm to
quote:

Islam as a religion sprung from from the loins of a war lord pedophile in the 6th century. Regardless of whether or not the blood line went back to Abraham, the god described in the Qu'ran is very different from the God in the Bible and therefore cannot be the same being, regardless of the claims to the contrary.


I agree with you.
Posted by BamaGradinTn
Murfreesboro
Member since Dec 2008
26956 posts
Posted on 7/2/18 at 5:26 pm to
quote:

It's funny that all Christian denominations are descended from Catholicism,


It's funny that you actually believe this.

Just one example...show me one example in the New Testament of an infant being baptized.
Posted by GRTiger
On a roof eating alligator pie
Member since Dec 2008
62856 posts
Posted on 7/2/18 at 5:31 pm to
I would take 9 staunch constitution loving atheists up there who thought they'd combust if their vote leaned to activism or legislation from the bench.
Posted by FooManChoo
Member since Dec 2012
41648 posts
Posted on 7/2/18 at 5:39 pm to
quote:

It's funny that you actually believe this.
The Reformation was an attempt to remove the unbliblical extravagances and errors of the Roman Catholic church that crept in through a millennia of "tradition" and return back to the scriptures as the sole basis for faith and life.

quote:

Just one example...show me one example in the New Testament of an infant being baptized.
This issue isn't as straight forward as just providing an example of a child being baptized because it can be inferred through context of household baptisms listed in the New Testament. Fundamentally, though, it's an extension of how God dealt with families.

In the Old Testament, if the father/parents were in the covenant, the children were, too. It's why the sign of circumcision was given to all male children before they could assent to the Jewish faith because the mark was given based on the family as represented by the parents. Likewise in the New Testament, we have examples of an entire household receiving baptism upon the faith of a single person within that household.

The Jewish Christians especially would have been surprised to learn that God no longer worked covenantally with families in the New Testament Church if that were the case, and yet Paul doesn't address any issues about that in his letters, though the Jewish members struggled with other issues that Paul addressed like eating "unclean" foods sacrificed to idols. It's as if the expectation was a continuation of the way God worked within families but changed from more restricted and bloody sign of circumcision that pointed forward to Christ's shedding of blood to baptism.
This post was edited on 7/2/18 at 6:00 pm
Posted by deltaland
Member since Mar 2011
90509 posts
Posted on 7/2/18 at 6:07 pm to
I don't get the butthurt over this. I didn't think Catholic discrimination was still a thing among Protestants
Posted by Centinel
Idaho
Member since Sep 2016
43319 posts
Posted on 7/2/18 at 6:15 pm to
quote:

I don't get the butthurt over this. I didn't think Catholic discrimination was still a thing among Protestants



shite son, go talk to any Southern Baptist, Pentecostal, Holy Roller (Holiness), or any of the other batshit insane quasi-cult protestants in the bible belt.

Catholics are literally hitler.

Posted by zatetic
Member since Nov 2015
5677 posts
Posted on 7/2/18 at 6:20 pm to
This is ridiculous. Obviously their religion matters above all else. Otherwise what is the point of claiming a religion.

The Muslims are just following rules laid out in their holy book, Talmud, in regards to pedophilia.

first pageprev pagePage 3 of 4Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram