- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Posted on 2/22/18 at 1:27 pm to DallasTiger11
quote:
You’re an embarrassment to the state of Texas.
Nuns have guns under their habits in Texas.
Posted on 2/22/18 at 1:30 pm to texridder
The Supreme Court in November 2017 declined to review the 4th Circuit decision cited in the OP.
Posted on 2/22/18 at 1:31 pm to texridder
quote:
weapons that are most useful in military service — M-16 rifles and the like — may be banned
What can an M-16 do that AR-15 can't? I'll even give you a hint: There are two correct answers.
Posted on 2/22/18 at 1:34 pm to Damone
quote:
Where in the constitution does it limit the Second Amendment to self-defense?
Where in the constitution does it limit the First Amendment right of free speech?
Posted on 2/22/18 at 1:34 pm to texridder
quote:
No Federal Appeals Court Has Held Assault-type Weapons are 2A Protected
That's because 'assault weapon' is an oxymoron, moron...
Posted on 2/22/18 at 1:34 pm to texridder
Need to wait until Trump gets another justice on SCOTUS before this gets overturned. No confidence in Kennedy at this point, heck I bet he would vote to overturn Heller even though he was part of the original opinion!
Posted on 2/22/18 at 1:36 pm to texridder
quote:
Where in the constitution does it limit the First Amendment right of free speech?
So you agree on limiting all Constitutional freedoms?
Posted on 2/22/18 at 1:37 pm to texridder
quote:
assault-type weapons
If we painted them day-glo orange would that be ok?
Posted on 2/22/18 at 1:41 pm to texridder
I only have one question. Who is going to come take anything, firearm or other wise, that I own?
Posted on 2/22/18 at 1:55 pm to texridder
And no Supreme Court has said they're not.
This post was edited on 2/22/18 at 1:56 pm
Posted on 2/22/18 at 1:56 pm to udtiger
has the OP describe assault-type weapons yet?
Posted on 2/22/18 at 1:58 pm to texridder
To further clarify my improper use of the description "Assault-type weapons" in the OP, the Maryland statute provided:
The FSA provides that a person may neither “transport an assault weapon into the State” nor “possess, sell, offer to sell, transfer, purchase, or receive an assault weapon.” See Md. Code Ann., Crim. Law § 4-303(a).
The banned assault weapons include “assault long gun[s]” and “copycat weapon[s].” Id. § 4-301(d).
The FSA defines an assault long gun as a rifle or shotgun “listed under § 5-101(r)(2) of the Public Safety Article,” including the “Colt AR-15,” “Bushmaster semi-auto rifle,” and “AK-47 in all forms.” See Md. Code Ann., Crim. Law § 4-301(b); Md. Code Ann., Pub. Safety § 5-101(r)(2).
The list of prohibited rifles and shotguns in Md. Code Ann., Crim. Law § 4-301(b)consists of “specific assault weapons or their copies, regardless of which company produced and manufactured that assault weapon.”
See Md. Code Ann., Pub. Safety § 5-101(r)(2) (emphasis added).1
1 The rifles and shotguns specifically identified as banned in section 5-101(r)(2) — mostly semiautomatic rifles — are as follows:
(i) American Arms Spectre da Semiautomatic carbine; (ii) AK-47 in all forms; (iii) Algimec AGM-1 type semi-auto; (iv) AR 100 type semi-auto; (v) AR 180 type semi-auto; (vi) Argentine L.S.R. semi-auto; (vii) Australian Automatic Arms SAR type semi-auto; (viii) Auto-Ordnance Thompson M1 and 1927 semi-automatics; (ix) Barrett light .50 cal. semi-auto; (x) Beretta AR70 type semi-auto; (xi) Bushmaster semi-auto rifle; (xii) Calico models M-100 and M-900; (xiii) CIS SR 88 type semi-auto; (xiv) Claridge HI TEC C-9 carbines; (xv) Colt AR-15, CAR-15, and all imitations except Colt AR-15 Sporter H-BAR rifle; (xvi) Daewoo MAX 1 and MAX 2, aka AR 100, 110C, K-1, and K-2; (xvii) Dragunov Chinese made semi-auto; (xviii) Famas semi-auto (.223 caliber); (xix) Feather AT-9 semi-auto; (xx) FN LAR and FN FAL assault rifle; (xxi) FNC semi-auto type carbine; (xxii) F.I.E./Franchi LAW 12 and SPAS 12 assault shotgun; (xxiii) Steyr-AUG-SA semi-auto; (xxiv) Galil models AR and ARM semi-auto; (xxv) Heckler and Koch HK-91 A3, HK-93 A2, HK-94 A2 and A3; (xxvi) Holmes model 88 shotgun; (xxvii) Avtomat Kalashnikov semiautomatic rifle in any format; (xxviii) Manchester Arms “Commando” MK-45, MK-9; (xxix) Mandell TAC-1 semi-auto carbine; (xxx) Mossberg model 500 Bullpup assault shotgun; (xxxi) Sterling Mark 6; (xxxii) P.A.W.S. carbine; (xxxiii) Ruger mini-14 folding stock model (.223 caliber); (xxxiv) SIG 550/551 assault rifle (.223 caliber); (xxxv) SKS with detachable magazine; (xxxvi) AP-74 Commando type semi-auto; (xxxvii) Springfield Armory BM-59, SAR-48, G3, SAR-3, M-21 sniper rifle, M1A, excluding the M1 Garand; (xxxviii) Street sweeper assault type shotgun; (xxxix) Striker 12 assault shotgun in all formats; (xl) Unique F11 semi-auto type; (xli) Daewoo USAS 12semi-auto shotgun; (xlii) UZI 9mm carbine or rifle; (xliii) Valmet M-76 and M-78 semi-auto; (xliv) Weaver Arms “Nighthawk” semi-auto carbine; or (xlv) Wilkinson Arms 9mm semi-auto “Terry.”
The FSA provides that a person may neither “transport an assault weapon into the State” nor “possess, sell, offer to sell, transfer, purchase, or receive an assault weapon.” See Md. Code Ann., Crim. Law § 4-303(a).
The banned assault weapons include “assault long gun[s]” and “copycat weapon[s].” Id. § 4-301(d).
The FSA defines an assault long gun as a rifle or shotgun “listed under § 5-101(r)(2) of the Public Safety Article,” including the “Colt AR-15,” “Bushmaster semi-auto rifle,” and “AK-47 in all forms.” See Md. Code Ann., Crim. Law § 4-301(b); Md. Code Ann., Pub. Safety § 5-101(r)(2).
The list of prohibited rifles and shotguns in Md. Code Ann., Crim. Law § 4-301(b)consists of “specific assault weapons or their copies, regardless of which company produced and manufactured that assault weapon.”
See Md. Code Ann., Pub. Safety § 5-101(r)(2) (emphasis added).1
1 The rifles and shotguns specifically identified as banned in section 5-101(r)(2) — mostly semiautomatic rifles — are as follows:
(i) American Arms Spectre da Semiautomatic carbine; (ii) AK-47 in all forms; (iii) Algimec AGM-1 type semi-auto; (iv) AR 100 type semi-auto; (v) AR 180 type semi-auto; (vi) Argentine L.S.R. semi-auto; (vii) Australian Automatic Arms SAR type semi-auto; (viii) Auto-Ordnance Thompson M1 and 1927 semi-automatics; (ix) Barrett light .50 cal. semi-auto; (x) Beretta AR70 type semi-auto; (xi) Bushmaster semi-auto rifle; (xii) Calico models M-100 and M-900; (xiii) CIS SR 88 type semi-auto; (xiv) Claridge HI TEC C-9 carbines; (xv) Colt AR-15, CAR-15, and all imitations except Colt AR-15 Sporter H-BAR rifle; (xvi) Daewoo MAX 1 and MAX 2, aka AR 100, 110C, K-1, and K-2; (xvii) Dragunov Chinese made semi-auto; (xviii) Famas semi-auto (.223 caliber); (xix) Feather AT-9 semi-auto; (xx) FN LAR and FN FAL assault rifle; (xxi) FNC semi-auto type carbine; (xxii) F.I.E./Franchi LAW 12 and SPAS 12 assault shotgun; (xxiii) Steyr-AUG-SA semi-auto; (xxiv) Galil models AR and ARM semi-auto; (xxv) Heckler and Koch HK-91 A3, HK-93 A2, HK-94 A2 and A3; (xxvi) Holmes model 88 shotgun; (xxvii) Avtomat Kalashnikov semiautomatic rifle in any format; (xxviii) Manchester Arms “Commando” MK-45, MK-9; (xxix) Mandell TAC-1 semi-auto carbine; (xxx) Mossberg model 500 Bullpup assault shotgun; (xxxi) Sterling Mark 6; (xxxii) P.A.W.S. carbine; (xxxiii) Ruger mini-14 folding stock model (.223 caliber); (xxxiv) SIG 550/551 assault rifle (.223 caliber); (xxxv) SKS with detachable magazine; (xxxvi) AP-74 Commando type semi-auto; (xxxvii) Springfield Armory BM-59, SAR-48, G3, SAR-3, M-21 sniper rifle, M1A, excluding the M1 Garand; (xxxviii) Street sweeper assault type shotgun; (xxxix) Striker 12 assault shotgun in all formats; (xl) Unique F11 semi-auto type; (xli) Daewoo USAS 12semi-auto shotgun; (xlii) UZI 9mm carbine or rifle; (xliii) Valmet M-76 and M-78 semi-auto; (xliv) Weaver Arms “Nighthawk” semi-auto carbine; or (xlv) Wilkinson Arms 9mm semi-auto “Terry.”
Posted on 2/22/18 at 2:03 pm to Damone
quote:
So you agree on limiting all Constitutional freedoms?
I am not aware of a constitutional right that is not limited in some way. (Sessions-type denial).
Posted on 2/22/18 at 2:05 pm to texridder
quote:
Ruger mini-14 folding stock model (.223 caliber)
But not the fixed stock model. This tells me all I need to know.
ETA: You ever going to answer my question about the M-16 vs. the AR-15?
This post was edited on 2/22/18 at 2:06 pm
Posted on 2/22/18 at 2:05 pm to texridder
quote:
The Heller Court specified that “weapons that are most useful in military service — M-16 rifles and the like — may be banned” without infringement upon the Second Amendment right.
You want to put this into context, or are you going to pretend that this is really what the court said?
For those interested, the full quote that he is attempting to pass off as the Court permitting the ban of these rifles is below:
quote:
It may be objected that if weapons that are most useful in military service—M-16 rifles and the like—may be banned, then the Second Amendment right is completely detached from the prefatory clause. But as we have said, the conception of the militia at the time of the Second Amendment’s ratification was the body of all citizens capable of military service, who would bring the sorts of lawful weapons that they possessed at home to militia duty. It may well be true today that a militia, to be as effective as militias in the 18th century, would require
sophisticated arms that are highly unusual in society at large. Indeed, it may be true that no amount of small arms could be useful against modern-day bombers and
tanks. But the fact that modern developments have limited the degree of fit between the prefatory clause and the protected right cannot change our interpretation of the right.
This post was edited on 2/22/18 at 2:07 pm
Posted on 2/22/18 at 2:07 pm to udtiger
quote:
And no Supreme Court has said they're not.
The Supreme Court in November 2017 declined to review the 4th Circuit decision cited in the OP.
Posted on 2/22/18 at 2:07 pm to texridder
quote:
I am not aware of a constitutional right that is not limited in some way.
None of the others say “shall not be infringed”
Posted on 2/22/18 at 2:11 pm to texridder
My kitchen drawer is FULL of assault weapons. Guess I'll have to start eating with my hands. Wait, I'm a seventh degree black belt...........gotta cut off my hands and feet. 
Posted on 2/22/18 at 2:13 pm to Dawgfanman
quote:
None of the others say “shall not be infringed”
The First Amendment uses the "abridged" as to speech.
quote:
Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech,
Popular
Back to top



1





