- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: No evidence of fraud in GA
Posted on 8/16/23 at 12:40 pm to Meauxjeaux
Posted on 8/16/23 at 12:40 pm to Meauxjeaux
Imagine a system that is capable of scanning and counting duplicate ballots without recognizing it.
That’s pretty much the definition of gross incompetence. It’s built to allow fraud.
That’s pretty much the definition of gross incompetence. It’s built to allow fraud.
0
Posted on 8/16/23 at 12:40 pm to the808bass
quote:
Read this again slowly and let your brain absorb it.
I already did. That's why I copied and pasted it in my post.
I'm passing along information. I know that's unusual around here but I think it's important. Some of you disagree and prefer cool insults but I'm weird I guess.
Posted on 8/16/23 at 12:41 pm to JoeHackett
No, you didn’t.
That says, if you read it for comprehension, the totals don’t match.
That says, if you read it for comprehension, the totals don’t match.
Posted on 8/16/23 at 12:41 pm to Mid Iowa Tiger
quote:
They will circle back to “it’s been debunked” without it ever having been investigated, let alone debunked.
The "it's been debunked" statement without ever being debunked is usually their go-to statement
Posted on 8/16/23 at 12:43 pm to the808bass
quote:
No, you didn’t.
I didn't post that? I skipped over that part when I quoted the article?
quote:
That says, if you read it for comprehension, the totals don’t match.
I never said anything about the totals matching. I just passed along some relevant information about this story from a year ago.
Posted on 8/16/23 at 12:44 pm to JoeHackett
Right. And the information you passed along doesn’t say what you pretend that it says.
Posted on 8/16/23 at 12:45 pm to the808bass
quote:
Right. And the information you passed along doesn’t say what you pretend that it says.
What am I pretending it says?
Posted on 8/16/23 at 12:46 pm to Meauxjeaux
quote:
quote:several questions arise. Other than the complete lack of context of the video, Agree that more context would be awesome. I'm a huge stickler for 100% transparency. Let's see it all! From the start to the finish. Then you say this... quote:but it has to be able to stand up to scrutiny, this one like all the others dosen't. So you really don't give a frick about context, just vomiting shite onto a message board and... quote:just looking to validate your pre-conceived beliefs
^
Was on board with dude that it needs context, but then he says frick it all this isn’t legit, without having the context he wanted
Posted on 8/16/23 at 12:47 pm to JoeHackett
Another obtuse POS. We have almost reached our limit here.
Posted on 8/16/23 at 12:48 pm to tzimme4
quote:
The "it's been debunked" statement without ever being debunked is usually their go-to statement
waddayu mean??
They have some parrot out there who just declares = "that's all Russian Disinformation"
- and that is all it takes for 'them' to say - "IT'S ALREADY BEEN DEBUNKED!!!"
Posted on 8/16/23 at 12:48 pm to TDTOM
quote:
Another obtuse POS. We have almost reached our limit here.
Sorry for passing along a story from a year ago.
Posted on 8/16/23 at 12:52 pm to Meauxjeaux
Posted on 8/16/23 at 12:55 pm to tzimme4
quote:
The "it's been debunked" statement without ever being debunked is usually their go-to statement
In terms of double counting ballots, it has been debunked. Obviously Georgia Republicans are "in on it" but you can read this anyway.
LINK
quote:
Georgia’s historic first statewide audit reaffirmed that the state’s new secure paper ballot voting system accurately counted and reported results,” said Secretary Raffensperger.
quote:
“Georgia’s first statewide audit successfully confirmed the winner of the chosen contest and should give voters increased confidence in the results,” said Ben Adida, Executive Director of VotingWorks. “We were proud to work with Georgia on this historic audit. The difference between the reported results and the full manual tally is well within the expected error rate of hand-counting ballots, and the audit was a success.”
quote:
The audit process also led to counties catching making mistakes they made in their original count by not uploading all memory cards. Those counties uploaded the memory cards and re-certified their results, leading to increased accuracy in the results the state will certify.
The differential of the audit results from the original machine counted results is well within the expected margin of human error that occurs when hand-counting ballots. A 2012 study by Rice University and Clemson University found that “hand counting of votes in postelection audit or recount procedures can result in error rates of up to 2 percent.” In Georgia’s recount, the highest error rate in any county recount was .73%. Most counties found no change in their finally tally. The majority of the remaining counties had changes of fewer than ten ballots.
Posted on 8/16/23 at 12:55 pm to Meauxjeaux
Their answer will be the same as always
quote:
...but it wasnt enough to overturn the election
Posted on 8/16/23 at 12:55 pm to jbdawgs03
quote:
Nope! Ole Joe won fair and square! - Ronbots
You spelled “every Republican election official in the state of Georgia, every judge that’s reviewed the evidence, and every person willing to testify under oath” wrong.
Posted on 8/16/23 at 12:56 pm to westerntigerfan
quote:
Well if you are curious, and not just looking to validate your pre-conceived beliefs several questions arise. Other than the complete lack of context of the video, such as who the person is and how do they have access to scanned ballots. The other questions I have is that if this was done in a deliberate matter to help Biden, then why were both republican and democrat ballots double scanned? If the images are legit, is there any evidence that both ballots were actually counted? Ballots have serial numbers to prevent double counting. You can show videos without context and make it look like evidence, but it has to be able to stand up to scrutiny, this one like all the others dosen't.
tucker on Twitter
This video addresses most of your questions
Posted on 8/16/23 at 12:58 pm to Meauxjeaux
Just the water pipe burst - urinal overflow story inconsistency creates a reasonable articulable cause to warrant an investigation that they never conducted.
Then there is the suitcases of ballots that were hidden until "counting stopped" and the video of them scanning the mystery ballots multiple times.
Finally the 2000 mules geofencing data and videos of ballot box stuffing is enough to justify a full scale wide investigation of a coordinated effort to overturn an election.
And that's just Fulton county.
Then there is the suitcases of ballots that were hidden until "counting stopped" and the video of them scanning the mystery ballots multiple times.
Finally the 2000 mules geofencing data and videos of ballot box stuffing is enough to justify a full scale wide investigation of a coordinated effort to overturn an election.
And that's just Fulton county.
Posted on 8/16/23 at 1:01 pm to JoeHackett
quote:
The most obvious example of duplicates in the initial count occurred in a batch of 99 ballots first scanned the morning of Oct. 28,
Intersting...
Posted on 8/16/23 at 1:06 pm to Meauxjeaux
quote:
Interesting...
Most Georgia counties scanned already returned ballots early. Fulton county scanned from 10/19-11/6.
LINK
Posted on 8/16/23 at 1:08 pm to JoeHackett
quote:
The audit process also led to counties catching making mistakes they made in their original count by not uploading all memory cards. Those counties uploaded the memory cards and re-certified their results, leading to increased accuracy in the results the state will certify.
The differential of the audit results from the original machine counted results is well within the expected margin of human error that occurs when hand-counting ballots. A 2012 study by Rice University and Clemson University found that “hand counting of votes in postelection audit or recount procedures can result in error rates of up to 2 percent.” In Georgia’s recount, the highest error rate in any county recount was .73%. Most counties found no change in their finally tally. The majority of the remaining counties had changes of fewer than ten ballot
Again this was a recount. I DGAF about recounts. Yes the same illegal votes will be counted and total the same. A legitimate audit would show the illegal ballots and where they ran these ballots over and over through a counter.
Page 3 of 4
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News