
- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Nick Feuntes this generations Alex Jones
Posted on 10/29/26 at 5:47 pm
Posted on 10/29/26 at 5:47 pm
Posted on 10/29/26 at 5:51 pm to OWLFAN86
He's a cia asset used to slander the right
however, "We are going to be the victim of a tidal wave of left wing cultural revolution because they didn't use the power they had" - this is accurate
however, "We are going to be the victim of a tidal wave of left wing cultural revolution because they didn't use the power they had" - this is accurate
Posted on 10/29/26 at 5:52 pm to 3rdDOWN
quote:
however, "We are going to be the victim of a tidal wave of left wing cultural revolution because they didn't use the power they had" - this is accurate
What power? There’s a freaking 60 vote filibuster threshold in the Senate.
The next Republican President isn’t going to be able to hurdle that either.
Posted on 10/29/26 at 5:54 pm to OWLFAN86
Gay fem-boi asset.
But will you all realize it’s ALL of them?
It’s everyone on your tv.
Everyone on the major podcasts.
ALL OF THEM.
EVERY SINGLE ONE.
Charlie Kirk was/is one of them.
Candace Owens.
Tucker.
Alex.
Every news anchor on FOX, CNN, MSNBC etc.
When will people begin to at least permit the idea that dialectics are used to control everything?
Is it that unfathomable to think opposing forces are created by something to achieve a desired outcome?
But will you all realize it’s ALL of them?
It’s everyone on your tv.
Everyone on the major podcasts.
ALL OF THEM.
EVERY SINGLE ONE.
Charlie Kirk was/is one of them.
Candace Owens.
Tucker.
Alex.
Every news anchor on FOX, CNN, MSNBC etc.
When will people begin to at least permit the idea that dialectics are used to control everything?
Is it that unfathomable to think opposing forces are created by something to achieve a desired outcome?
Posted on 10/29/26 at 5:54 pm to Stidham8
quote:When you have all three branches of government. That power
What power? There’s a freaking 60 vote filibuster threshold in the Senate.
Posted on 10/29/26 at 5:55 pm to Stidham8
quote:
What power? There’s a freaking 60 vote filibuster threshold in the Senate.
Exactly. Don’t know why people are freaking out about mid terms. All your getting is a gridlocked government.
Posted on 10/29/26 at 5:56 pm to OWLFAN86
Is this the guy that did Charlie Kirk was killed by an explosive device? I get the crazy ones mixed up.
Posted on 10/29/26 at 5:56 pm to Stidham8
Trumps out there literally acting like a one man govt doing what he can while commie Dems and cuck Rinos fight him every step of the way. And the response of the morons, including this clown, is gonna be to vote for the commie Dems and cuck rinos? No wonder nobody takes Republicans seriously.
Posted on 10/29/26 at 6:00 pm to tShadowTiger
I don't listen to any of those people. There's not a podcaster or influencer I follow; I get all my political news here on the PoliBoard
Posted on 10/29/26 at 6:18 pm to 3rdDOWN
quote:
When you have all three branches of government. That power
I assume you mean for passing new laws? Well that doesn’t mean jack. If you don’t have the 60 votes in the Senate you cannot pass any legislation aside from the 1 time reconciliation bill (which they did with the one BBB).
I know low IQ Fuentes has convinced his followers that having all 3 branches means third Reich unlimited dictatorial power but that couldn’t be further from the truth.
This post was edited on 10/29/26 at 6:21 pm
Posted on 10/29/26 at 6:20 pm to OWLFAN86
Fuentes was saying something to the effect that things would be so much better if Kamala had won because Trump would be this legendary figure, and the left would go after people on the right, and then only the strongest people on the right would be left to remake the GOP or make a new America First party.
No, actually if Kamala had won, Trump would probably be in prison right now, and the left would have taken out the strongest people on the right, meaning the only ones left would be the weak RINO GOP.
He's talented but his position of voting for and handing over power to Democrats is just dumb as hell. Trump showed the way, keep winning and take over the GOP, but need to get rid of the RINOs next time.
No, actually if Kamala had won, Trump would probably be in prison right now, and the left would have taken out the strongest people on the right, meaning the only ones left would be the weak RINO GOP.
He's talented but his position of voting for and handing over power to Democrats is just dumb as hell. Trump showed the way, keep winning and take over the GOP, but need to get rid of the RINOs next time.
Posted on 10/29/26 at 7:40 pm to Stidham8
The filibuster is a Senate rule and can be changed by the majority with 51 votes. There will not be a filibuster when the Dems run the Senate. They will ram through anything they want. Trump will have to veto what the Democrats pass.
Posted on 10/29/26 at 7:45 pm to Tiger1955
At a time like this, we coulda used a master of Senate Rules like John Cornyn
Posted on 10/29/26 at 7:48 pm to Stidham8
quote:You can pass legislation by ending the filibuster. Which they have the power to do...Which they are choosing not to do.
If you don’t have the 60 votes in the Senate you cannot pass any legislation aside from the 1 time reconciliation bill (which they did with the one BBB).
Both dems and republicans in congress and senate are anti Trump. and it going to cost us our country
Posted on 10/29/26 at 7:49 pm to OWLFAN86
quote:he's this generation's Tucker Carlson but without Murdoch's leash
Nick Feuntes this generations Alex Jones

Popular
Back to top

5









