Started By
Message

re: New York Times Goes Pro-Soviet for Moon Landing Anniversary

Posted on 7/20/19 at 12:12 pm to
Posted by weptiger
Georgia
Member since Feb 2007
11625 posts
Posted on 7/20/19 at 12:12 pm to
NYT - aside from liberal filth, they are historical projecting revisionists. Praising the Russians on the anniversary of the moon landing....shameful.
Posted by jrodLSUke
Premium
Member since Jan 2011
25773 posts
Posted on 7/20/19 at 12:16 pm to
quote:

The NY Times has done a number of articles on the Moon Landing this

This deserves its own thread.
Posted by OBReb6
Memphissippi
Member since Jul 2010
41553 posts
Posted on 7/20/19 at 1:09 pm to
quote:

The Soviets tried to win the hearts and minds of the “downtrodden” by actively promoting members of the “downtrodden” groups in highly-public ways.

How is it remotely debatable that the Soviets did this? Why is it even one iota controversial to acknowledge that the Soviets did so?

Some people just spend far too much time looking for things to complain about. Maybe some of you folks need to re-watch that video about the female filmmaker who had to re-examine her preconceptions about male rights activists.



Um, how about writing this piece on ANY day but today?
Posted by blueboy
Member since Apr 2006
63233 posts
Posted on 7/20/19 at 1:25 pm to
quote:

the U.S.S.R.’s commitment to equality


>
>
Posted by Zach
Gizmonic Institute
Member since May 2005
116748 posts
Posted on 7/20/19 at 1:30 pm to
quote:

the Soviets went on to send the first woman, the first Asian man, and the first black man into orbit —


What were their names? Any pics?
Posted by LSURussian
Member since Feb 2005
133642 posts
Posted on 7/20/19 at 1:37 pm to
I worked several years in Russia. The average Russian male is the most racist, sexist and homophobic person you could ever meet.

Of course, with a family name of Kolchak, you probably already know that....
Posted by LSURussian
Member since Feb 2005
133642 posts
Posted on 7/20/19 at 2:14 pm to
quote:

The Soviets tried to win the hearts and minds of the “downtrodden” by actively promoting members of the “downtrodden” groups in highly-public ways.

How is it remotely debatable that the Soviets did this?
I can debate you all day long and twice on Sundays about that. The "promoting" they did was entirely form over substance. As I was told by a wise Russian early in my career working in Russia, "Nothing in Russia is as it seems."

An example of that is what happened to Yuri Gagarin, the first man in outer space. He had become critical of the Soviet system and had told close friends he planned to renounce the government for bribes and other corruption surrounding the Russian space program.

Gagarin was killed when his MiG-15 training jet mysteriously exploded and crashed five weeks after his closest friend and fellow cosmonaut Vladimir Komarov was killed in the fatal crash of Soyuz 1.

Soyuz 1 was the first crewed flight of the Soyuz spacecraft. The flight was plagued with technical issues, and Komarov was killed when the descent module crashed into the ground due to a parachute failure.
Posted by LuckyTiger
Someone's Alter
Member since Dec 2008
51013 posts
Posted on 7/20/19 at 2:18 pm to
Guess they decided to gloss over how the Soviets practiced genocide by starving about 10 million Ukrainians.

Yay equal rights.
Posted by AUstar
Member since Dec 2012
19265 posts
Posted on 7/20/19 at 5:01 pm to
Yuri Bezmenov (former Soviet spy who defected to America) said in 1983 that the Soviets usually pushed minority rights to create a crisis in other countries (i.e. to divide and weaken them). He said "After we roll our tanks into a country we occupy, we will simply round up all the gays and shoot them on sight even though publicly we claim to support gay rights."

He mentioned how they did this in Latin America. They rounded up a lot of "allies" who helped form the communist governments down there and killed them. That's why they're called useful idiots. They are useful but also expendable.

The Soviets were also behind the Vietnam protests in the 60's. They funded most of the activity on college campuses. They didn't want America in Vietnam because they wanted SE Asia as a communist stronghold.
Posted by Smart Post
Member since Feb 2018
3539 posts
Posted on 7/20/19 at 6:46 pm to
What would one expect? The NYT article was written by Sophie Pinkham of the Hebrew persuasion.
Posted by LosLobos111
Austere
Member since Feb 2011
45385 posts
Posted on 7/20/19 at 7:12 pm to
Funny because the progressive s will abandon the gays/blacks/Hispanics the second after they get power.

Posted by ShortyRob
Member since Oct 2008
82116 posts
Posted on 7/20/19 at 7:37 pm to
Funny part is, the NYT was pro-soviet union back then too!!
Posted by Wild Thang
YAW YAW Fooball Nation
Member since Jun 2009
44181 posts
Posted on 7/20/19 at 7:55 pm to
quote:

AggieHank86


Your IQ is very low
Posted by wookalar1013
up ta camp
Member since Jun 2017
2058 posts
Posted on 7/20/19 at 8:02 pm to
quote:

with an amazing interactive of the landing.


that was badass, thanks
first pageprev pagePage 2 of 2Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram