- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
0
Posted on 1/23/19 at 1:43 pm to VitoAndolini
Did a doctor give a medical diagnosis to the mother stating she was at serious health risk for carrying this child to term? Did the child survive? Was there a life threatening condition?
Posted on 1/23/19 at 1:44 pm to ShortyRob
If you want mothers to risk their lives to carry a non viable fetus then that's exactly what you want.
This post was edited on 1/23/19 at 1:45 pm
Posted on 1/23/19 at 1:45 pm to TbirdSpur2010
Tamales? Omg what cultural appropriation. How absolutely dare you sir!
This post was edited on 1/23/19 at 1:46 pm
Posted on 1/23/19 at 1:46 pm to TexasTiger86
quote:
Tamales? Omg what cultural appropriation. How absolutely dare you sir!
WAIT! I'm covered! I have a San Antonio anchor baby!
Posted on 1/23/19 at 1:47 pm to TbirdSpur2010
Ok, you’re safe...for now.
Posted on 1/23/19 at 1:47 pm to ShreveportHog94
quote:
ShreveportHog94
So, which prison would you have tossed ol' Tbird in, bruh?
Posted on 1/23/19 at 1:49 pm to BamaAtl
quote:
Anti-abortion folks get crazier and crazier
Y'all are OK with killing otherwise viable babies simply because they haven't been born yet. And WE'RE the crazy ones?
Posted on 1/23/19 at 1:51 pm to FairhopeTider
quote:
Then why would we call a pregnant woman a mother?
Because "incubator" or "parasite host" sounds mean.
Posted on 1/23/19 at 1:56 pm to ShreveportHog94
quote:Again, I get that you have to pretend this hasn't been addressed many times already in our history. If you really don't know, I suggest you research. I can't do that for you.
In your world that is clearly only going on in your head,
quote:Strawman.
women are murderous creatures that are procreating for the sole purpose of having an abortion in the 3rd trimester.
quote:The "health" exception doesn't require a medical doctor. But, I can't do that research for you.
And medical doctors are going along with this?
quote:It's actually ALREADY been applied and in fact, I provided a link.
Now run that back and apply it to the real world
I can't be informed for you.
Posted on 1/23/19 at 1:56 pm to ShreveportHog94
quote:Not a requirement of this law.
serious health risk f
Posted on 1/23/19 at 1:57 pm to ShreveportHog94
quote:
If you want mothers to risk their lives
I don't. And what's worse is, you know I don't. But, you're a liar so you don't care.
I support a life exception. Hell, I support a physical health risk exception. And what do you mean "non-viable"? This bill doesn't require that at all.
Posted on 1/23/19 at 1:57 pm to RebelExpress38
While they’re at it, why not just make abortion legal up to the 270th trimester.
This post was edited on 1/23/19 at 1:58 pm
Posted on 1/23/19 at 1:59 pm to ShortyRob
quote:
ShortyRob
What version of the bill are you reading?
§ 2599-BB. ABORTION. 1. A HEALTH CARE PRACTITIONER LICENSED, CERTI-
43 FIED, OR AUTHORIZED UNDER TITLE EIGHT OF THE EDUCATION LAW, ACTING WITH-
44 IN HIS OR HER LAWFUL SCOPE OF PRACTICE, MAY PERFORM AN ABORTION WHEN,
45 ACCORDING TO THE PRACTITIONER'S REASONABLE AND GOOD FAITH PROFESSIONAL
46 JUDGMENT BASED ON THE FACTS OF THE PATIENT'S CASE: THE PATIENT IS WITHIN
47 TWENTY-FOUR WEEKS FROM THE COMMENCEMENT OF PREGNANCY, OR THERE IS AN
48 ABSENCE OF FETAL VIABILITY, OR THE ABORTION IS NECESSARY TO PROTECT THE
49 PATIENT'S LIFE OR HEALTH.
Posted on 1/23/19 at 2:01 pm to AUjim
quote:The version in the link provided by the liberals in this thread that I have quoted like 3 times.
What version of the bill are you reading?
Do NONE of you stupid fricks know what the word "or" means?
And, I've covered the OR HEALTH part ad infinitum in this thread. Keep up.
Posted on 1/23/19 at 2:02 pm to ShortyRob
quote:
serious health risk f
Not a requirement of this law.
Sure is.
This post was edited on 1/23/19 at 2:02 pm
Posted on 1/23/19 at 2:02 pm to ShortyRob
quote:
The "health" exception doesn't require a medical doctor. But, I can't do that research for you.
You seem comfortable lying.
Posted on 1/23/19 at 2:03 pm to BamaAtl
quote:Nope. Alas. We already know you're a liar, so this is nothing new.
Sure is.
But. Go ahead. Quote the relevant section.
Posted on 1/23/19 at 2:03 pm to ShortyRob
Maybe I apologize....but I'm not reading 21 pages of bad opinions. Can you really quickly catch me up by answering one question?
Do people believe that this makes abortion legal in New York up until birth just for any reason?
Do people believe that this makes abortion legal in New York up until birth just for any reason?
Posted on 1/23/19 at 2:04 pm to ShreveportHog94
quote:Link to the medical doctor requirement on the "health" risk.
You seem comfortable lying.
I'll wait.
Page 22 of 37
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News