- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: New York allows polyamorous marriages with same legal protections as monogamous
Posted on 10/9/22 at 2:18 am to Tigerfan56
Posted on 10/9/22 at 2:18 am to Tigerfan56
quote:
But your reasons aren’t just ignorance and hate,
Oh frick off with these lazy buzzwords. Get some new material.
1
Posted on 10/9/22 at 5:40 am to OMLandshark
I do not agree with this from a legality stand point. Companies are going to have to go to war with this. You know how 15 illegals will move into a 2 bedroom 900 square foot apartment? Same idea only with your health insurance. And if you don't provide health insurance, the state is going to fine you into oblivion. Once again for the RINOs in the pack, OM, it's not a free market if you have the government standing behind the door with a ball bat forcing you to support it.
Posted on 10/9/22 at 6:44 am to biglego
quote:
Oh frick off with these lazy buzzwords. Get some new material.
“Get some new material” says the southerners who continue to follow the same script of the last 300 years by being on the wrong side of history.
Posted on 10/9/22 at 6:45 am to Tigerfan56
quote:
Dehumanizing a group so you don’t have to do so many mental gymnastics to justify why you discriminate against them. This has played out in history many times.
quote:
“Get some new material” says the southerners who continue to follow the same script of the last 300 years by being on the wrong side of history.
Classic.
Posted on 10/9/22 at 6:49 am to squid_hunt
quote:
Classic
Is it dehumanizing to point out facts? Has the south not consistently been on the wrong side of history?
I always forget when we prefer facts over feelings around here
Posted on 10/9/22 at 6:51 am to Tigerfan56
quote:
Is it dehumanizing to point out facts?
As long as you only point out facts that 1. I agree with and 2. Are actually mostly political opinions of my party no that’s not dehumanizing.
But if you point out an actually scientifically verified fact I don’t agree with that goes against my party line then yes that’s very dehumanizing and triggering.
This post was edited on 10/9/22 at 8:54 am
Posted on 10/9/22 at 6:55 am to Tigerfan56
quote:
Has the south not consistently been on the wrong side of history?
The south fought in the American Revolution and both world wars. The south also had plenty of people fighting on both sides of the civil war and the civil rights movement.
But sure it’s easy for you to assign motive and belief to an entire group of people because of the actions of those who look like them or live in their communities as long as that assignment allows you to dehumanize and discriminate against them so you can score political points.
You’re either an ignorant political pawn that needs to open your eyes or you’re willingly dishonest and evil. Either way you should take a look in the mirror and reevaluate your life.
Posted on 10/9/22 at 7:51 am to Darth_Vader
quote:
I was talking about the move to redefine marriage to allow gay marriage. Go reread my post or have someone with a reading comprehension level above that of a special needs 2nd grader read it for you. Gay marriage opened Pandora’s box, dumbass. Without gay marriage, we would not even be discussing plural marriage. Plural marriage, which while ancient in other civilizations, has never been accepted in the United States. It was the redefinition of marriage to allow gay marriage that made the possibly of plural marriage a reality in the US.
Somehow the irony is lost on you that you’re (general you) who redefined marriage, restricting freedom to contract in the process, and when the pendulum starts to swing back towards what is the historical norm, you cry about marriage being redefined
Let me know when people start marrying dogs and toasters, like I was guaranteed. Because if this is the best you have as evidence for the slope being slippery, I’m unimpressed.
Posted on 10/9/22 at 9:07 am to OMLandshark
Libertarians have no issue with a porn shop next door to a daycare and this is the same.
"Do what you want as long as it doesn't effect me"
"Do what you want as long as it doesn't effect me"
Posted on 10/9/22 at 9:10 am to tiggerthetooth
quote:
Libertarians have no issue with a porn shop next door to a daycare and this is the same.
"Do what you want as long as it doesn't effect me"
And yet conservatives would have us think that it's only those damned liberals who champion restrictive zoning laws.
This post was edited on 10/9/22 at 9:11 am
Posted on 10/9/22 at 9:12 am to OMLandshark
quote:
New York allows polyamorous marriages with same legal protections as monogamous
ALLOWS? Who TF is any government to "ALLOW" consenting adults to do as they please?
The government should excuse itself entirely from family relations. No licenses, no tax recognition, none of it. It's silly.
Marriage should only about religion.
Posted on 10/9/22 at 9:15 am to Grievous Angel
quote:
no tax recognition
Why not? Contractual business entities get tax recognition; why wouldn't contractual personal entities?
As always, I think income tax is bullshite, but as long as it exists, it should be consistent.
Posted on 10/9/22 at 9:21 am to OldHickory
quote:They are adults . Conservatives should stop the nonsense about individual freedom.
monogamous
Animals and kids are next.
Weird how Conservatives concern themselves with the personal lives of others.
Posted on 10/9/22 at 9:30 am to sugar71
quote:
Weird how Conservatives concern themselves with the personal lives of others.
No, it's not f*cking weird.
Other people's sh*tty decisions affect my family, my society, and me.
Many of those people should be unencumbered of their ability to make such decisions.
Posted on 10/9/22 at 9:53 am to Toadvine
quote:Weird how conservatives don't see the hypocrisy at all in demanding to make decisions in the personal lives of others because those others might make decisions that they don't like.quote:No, it's not f*cking weird.
Weird how Conservatives concern themselves with the personal lives of others.
Other people's sh*tty decisions affect my family, my society, and me.
Many of those people should be unencumbered of their ability to make such decisions.
Posted on 10/9/22 at 10:10 am to OMLandshark
1, 3, 2 (either system)
Posted on 10/9/22 at 10:30 am to OMLandshark
quote:
The attorney for the property owner said that O’Neill’s affidavit, in which he claims himself as a non-traditional family member, is a “fairytale.”
I see what he did there.
Posted on 10/9/22 at 11:20 am to Toadvine
quote:
No, it's not f*cking weird. Other people's sh*tty decisions affect my family, my society, and me. Many of those people should be unencumbered of their ability to make such decisions.
Careful with that line of thought. There’s a growing number of people who think, for example, that the outward practice of religion is a shitty decision that negatively affects society and the people in it. Your position makes for quite the double edged sword.
Posted on 10/9/22 at 11:30 am to OMLandshark
Does polyamorous limit the poly part to three individuals?
Or (in NYC where rent controlled leases cause (ahem) strange bedfellows) could a polyamorous marriage include ten guys, and the lease just passed along for eternity or life span of the building?
Or (in NYC where rent controlled leases cause (ahem) strange bedfellows) could a polyamorous marriage include ten guys, and the lease just passed along for eternity or life span of the building?
Page 3 of 4
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News