- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: New shooting in Minnesota
Posted on 1/24/26 at 6:02 pm to GhostofJackson
Posted on 1/24/26 at 6:02 pm to GhostofJackson
quote:
Everyone is firing at the same time because they believed there to be a threat. You think this was premeditated? That's retarded.
Let me ask you a question. Is the corollary of your theory also correct? Meaning, if there are a bunch of cops with their guns out during a situation from a similar vantage point and only one shoots….immediately NOT a good shot?
3
Posted on 1/24/26 at 6:02 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
You know of an officer-involved shooting where a cop killed an unarmed person and got away with it because they said they thought the decedent was armed without any objective evidence to support that belief ?
This reminds of the narrative put forth concerning an incident in Baton Rouge back in the day.
Posted on 1/24/26 at 6:02 pm to LSUTANGERINE
quote:Who bit his finger, and why aren't they dead?
The guy who was killed is not the person who bit his finger.
Posted on 1/24/26 at 6:03 pm to onmymedicalgrind
quote:
immediately NOT a good shot?
I would say that is unknown.
Why, what info are you privy to?
Posted on 1/24/26 at 6:04 pm to the808bass
Final form: Actual gay retard zombies trying to eat us
Posted on 1/24/26 at 6:04 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
it still depends.
Not really.
Posted on 1/24/26 at 6:05 pm to GeneralLee
I just got time to watch the videos. I think whoever fired shots is fricked.
I realize things are moving fast in that situation, but I didn’t see any angle showing the guy brandishing his weapon (it’s possible I missed one). And it looks like one of the ICE agents took it away from him a second or two before shots were fired.
It also looks like this guy never got physical with any of the agents and was trying to help another citizen out after they got pushed down.
I’ve been supportive of what ICE has done so far and thought the first shooting was justified. This one looks pretty bad IMO.
I realize things are moving fast in that situation, but I didn’t see any angle showing the guy brandishing his weapon (it’s possible I missed one). And it looks like one of the ICE agents took it away from him a second or two before shots were fired.
It also looks like this guy never got physical with any of the agents and was trying to help another citizen out after they got pushed down.
I’ve been supportive of what ICE has done so far and thought the first shooting was justified. This one looks pretty bad IMO.
Posted on 1/24/26 at 6:06 pm to onmymedicalgrind
quote:Talk to us about Lisfranc injury, Nov surgical stabilization, and recovery expectations.
onmymedicalgrind
Posted on 1/24/26 at 6:06 pm to the808bass
quote:
Not really.
The USSC standard is case by case based on the facts of each case.
There is also a reasonableness standard included in the analysis.
Posted on 1/24/26 at 6:07 pm to onmymedicalgrind
quote:
Let me ask you a question. Is the corollary of your theory also correct? Meaning, if there are a bunch of cops with their guns out during a situation from a similar vantage point and only one shoots….immediately NOT a good shot?
Reword your question to be more straightforward.
Posted on 1/24/26 at 6:07 pm to KillerNut9
Lol no you haven’t but thanks for your concern!
Posted on 1/24/26 at 6:07 pm to KillerNut9
quote:
It also looks like this guy never got physical with any of the agents and was trying to help another citizen out after they got pushed down.
Well, this just isn’t true.
Posted on 1/24/26 at 6:08 pm to the808bass
The problem with video is life doesn't start when a video begins. We don't know what this guy was doing prior. The officer approaches like he knows well who this guy is.
Posted on 1/24/26 at 6:09 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:The video indicates nothing except outcome.
That makes sense because the video doesn't indicate that seems likely
Posted on 1/24/26 at 6:09 pm to the808bass
quote:
Well, this just isn’t true.
You mind linking me to a video showing otherwise?
It’s honestly somewhat difficult to follow some of the videos due to a lot of the people wearing similar colors.
Posted on 1/24/26 at 6:09 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
There is also a reasonableness standard included in the analysis.
Once you’ve had serious physical injury, it seems clear that you are in danger of serious physical injury.
Posted on 1/24/26 at 6:09 pm to NC_Tigah
quote:
Talk to us about Lisfranc injury, Nov surgical stabilization, and recovery expectations.
He doesn’t know what any of those words mean.
Posted on 1/24/26 at 6:10 pm to KillerNut9
quote:
You mind linking me to a video showing otherwise?
Every video I’ve seen shows him making contact with the officers multiple times.
Posted on 1/24/26 at 6:10 pm to the808bass
quote:
Once you’ve had serious physical injury, it seems clear that you are in danger of serious physical injury.
Again, its' case by case with a reasonableness standard.
Any non-lethal threat isn't going to lead strongly one way or the other by itself.
Posted on 1/24/26 at 6:11 pm to texag7
quote:
He doesn’t know what any of those words mean.
He's a doctor (MD, not pHD)
Page 56 of 67
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News