Started By
Message

re: new Russian submarine tactics are threatening to overwhelm aging U.S. fleet

Posted on 2/14/18 at 12:36 pm to
Posted by Cosmo
glassman's guest house
Member since Oct 2003
131562 posts
Posted on 2/14/18 at 12:36 pm to
I dont believe those sub stats

What percentage of those Chinese and Russian subs are comparable to our attack and Trident subs?
Posted by member12
Bob's Country Bunker
Member since May 2008
33142 posts
Posted on 2/14/18 at 12:37 pm to
quote:

new Russian submarine tactics are threatening to overwhelm aging U.S. fleet



Our aging US fleet is much more modern than theirs.
Posted by TheGasMan
Member since Oct 2014
3485 posts
Posted on 2/14/18 at 12:41 pm to
quote:

What percentage of those Chinese and Russian subs are comparable to our attack and Trident subs?


Some of us may or may not have spent time tracking boats in a former life. While not easy, our technology makes it fairly routine and not that worrisome to track the vast majority of both countries boats.

Tracking ours on the other hand?

We’d do training ops with the surface fleet in which they’d make us stay at a certain depth, initiate an artificial noise maker, bang on the engine room hatch, and confine us to a small square. Our navy still couldn’t find us.

A boomer with RCPs secured running natural circulation through the reactor is literally impossible to find.
Posted by troyt37
Member since Mar 2008
14682 posts
Posted on 2/14/18 at 12:43 pm to
quote:

So a country on the other side of the world with no navy, and an obsolete air force is threat.


Left out some pretty important parts, didn't you? Like nuclear weapons, and ballistic missiles possibly capable of delivering those nuclear weapons to the continental US?
Posted by geaux88
Northshore, LA
Member since Oct 2003
16355 posts
Posted on 2/14/18 at 12:51 pm to
quote:

frick a Russia. We have the greatest submarine fleet ever assembled.


This. I'm all for massive overwhelming military, but our damn attack subs are just fine. Just like the '70's and '80's, the only indication a Russian boat will have that a U.S. Sub was in the vicinity is when they hear, too late, the screws of a torpedo coming at them, and too late, their hull implodes due to the U.S. sub destroying it.
This post was edited on 2/14/18 at 1:05 pm
Posted by terd ferguson
Darren Wilson Fan Club President
Member since Aug 2007
114938 posts
Posted on 2/14/18 at 12:52 pm to
quote:


We’d do training ops with the surface fleet in which they’d make us stay at a certain depth, initiate an artificial noise maker, bang on the engine room hatch, and confine us to a small square. Our navy still couldn’t find us.


I've done the same ops. P-3's flying around us dropping sonar buoys, surface ships all over the place above us. We could hear everything they were doing. We were slamming deck plates, hitting the pressure hull with wrenches, and purposely causing cavitation... they still couldn't find us.
Posted by ScottFowler
NE Ohio
Member since Sep 2012
4716 posts
Posted on 2/14/18 at 12:55 pm to
Yeah, this is a cash grab. Nobody has shite on the US sub fleet.
Posted by Ace Midnight
Between sanity and madness
Member since Dec 2006
95637 posts
Posted on 2/14/18 at 12:56 pm to
quote:

So a country on the other side of the world with no navy and an obsolete air force is threat.


They have a navy - not a blue water navy, but they have submarines, cruise missiles and nuclear weapons, in addition to their ballistic missile program.

You don't consider that a threat?
Posted by LSURussian
Member since Feb 2005
134899 posts
Posted on 2/14/18 at 12:59 pm to
quote:

Russian President Vladimir Putin is increasingly challenging U.S. security interests,
We can't be paying any attention to that now.

There was a guy who worked in the White House who roughed up his former wives and then got fired from his White House job because of it.

THAT'S what we need to be worrying about 24/7!!!
Posted by LSURussian
Member since Feb 2005
134899 posts
Posted on 2/14/18 at 1:03 pm to
quote:

They have a navy - not a blue water navy, but they have submarines, cruise missiles and nuclear weapons, in addition to their ballistic missile program.

You don't consider that a threat?
He was quoting the part about North Korea being a threat.
Posted by MrCarton
Paradise Valley, MT
Member since Dec 2009
20231 posts
Posted on 2/14/18 at 1:14 pm to
quote:

new Russian submarine tactics are threatening to overwhelm aging U.S. fleet


Nah
Posted by Aubie Spr96
lolwut?
Member since Dec 2009
44416 posts
Posted on 2/14/18 at 1:41 pm to
quote:

sounds like alarmism to get pentagon more money for communications security.



The military doesn't need more money. They have plenty of money.
Posted by Champagne
Sabine Free State.
Member since Oct 2007
55283 posts
Posted on 2/14/18 at 1:45 pm to
At this point in US history I think it would be unwise to assume that the USA has any military or diplomatic secrets that haven't been revealed to our enemies, our allies and to disinterested parties.
Posted by DownSouthJukin
1x tRant Poster of the Millennium
Member since Jan 2014
31776 posts
Posted on 2/14/18 at 1:46 pm to
quote:

Cutting the lines isn't the issue. Spy subs are.


Yeah-we all saw The Hunt for Red October in 1990. Has Mother Russia finally successfully developed and deployed the Caterpillar Drive?

You'd think the Pentagon would come up with new ways to scare our money out of Congress.
This post was edited on 2/14/18 at 1:51 pm
Posted by 90proofprofessional
Member since Mar 2004
24445 posts
Posted on 2/14/18 at 1:53 pm to
quote:

his submarine fleet’s “operational tempo is reaching Cold War-era levels,”

doubt it
Posted by udtiger
Over your left shoulder
Member since Nov 2006
115400 posts
Posted on 2/14/18 at 1:56 pm to
guess its a good thing that the Pentagon just got a $300 billion raise.

I suspect some boatyards are about to get busy
Posted by Ace Midnight
Between sanity and madness
Member since Dec 2006
95637 posts
Posted on 2/14/18 at 1:57 pm to
quote:

A boomer with RCPs secured running natural circulation through the reactor is literally impossible to find.


I'd read (not confirmed) they experimented with technology to make them sound more natural, as our boomers rigged for quiet running were quieter than the background noise of the ocean, because of sound absorption - our guys were starting to pick up on that to try to track them for exercises, so the fear was the Russians were too. Don't know if they ever implemented any of them, but it is an intriguing concept.

It used to be a punishable offense to knowingly track a boomer, unless it was a training exercise for that purpose, as well.
Posted by The Maj
Member since Sep 2016
30551 posts
Posted on 2/14/18 at 2:01 pm to
quote:

Caterpillar Drive?



Posted by udtiger
Over your left shoulder
Member since Nov 2006
115400 posts
Posted on 2/14/18 at 2:04 pm to
quote:

OPM was a disaster of untold consequence.


And, yet, you don't hear shite about it because it happened under Obama's watch and there's no one you can deflect it to like Muh Russians (which also happened under Obama)
first pageprev pagePage 2 of 2Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram