- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: New emails from Epstein about Trump released. These actually don’t look good.
Posted on 11/12/25 at 12:02 pm to hawgfaninc
Posted on 11/12/25 at 12:02 pm to hawgfaninc
Posted on 11/12/25 at 12:05 pm to blueboxer1119
quote:
Seems reasonable.
Am I the only one that laughs as in to think Epstein had a Gmail adress???
Posted on 11/12/25 at 12:12 pm to _Hurricane_
Those supposedly were referring specifically to Virginia Gruffrie who has stated Trump was never involved with her and the very limited amount of time she had around him he was overly nice to her
Posted on 11/12/25 at 1:02 pm to crazyLSUstudent
Posted on 11/12/25 at 1:08 pm to Jbird
How do they know the redacted name?
Posted on 11/12/25 at 1:21 pm to sorantable
quote:
How do they know the redacted name?
because they are on the oversight committee and saw whatever the "oversight Dems" saw?
That was not hard to figure out.
Posted on 11/12/25 at 1:30 pm to ljhog
quote:
Do you think these emails will keep him from being re-elected?
Kamala would be foolish not to release this foolproof evidence of Trump’s involvement with Epstein.
Posted on 11/12/25 at 1:34 pm to PsychTiger
White House trying to pressure Boebart to take her name off the petition so the rest of the files don’t come out.
Posted on 11/12/25 at 1:59 pm to Nosevens
quote:
Those supposedly were referring specifically to Virginia Gruffrie who has stated Trump was never involved with her and the very limited amount of time she had around him he was overly nice to her
So he knew at least one of Epstein’s girls and spent a limited amount of time with her. If he knew one he knew others and spent a limited amount of time with them.
It will be very swampy if Bowbert takes her name off the list after the meeting at the White House. That is not a good look
Posted on 11/12/25 at 2:06 pm to MizzouBS
Giuffre worked for MAL, her dad worked for MAL and got her a job. She was directly poached by Maxwell from MAL when she was a towel girl.
It seems very plausible she's the only "Epstein girl" Trump had more than passing familiarity with, and likely explains why Trump might have been at Epstein's with her there and it have been unremarkable to him.
The Democrats doing a pseudo redaction on Giuffre to make it look worse, when there has been a tell all PDF about all of her encounters circulating for years (including plenty of details about MAL and references to Trump - none particularly interesting) is pathetic.
It seems very plausible she's the only "Epstein girl" Trump had more than passing familiarity with, and likely explains why Trump might have been at Epstein's with her there and it have been unremarkable to him.
The Democrats doing a pseudo redaction on Giuffre to make it look worse, when there has been a tell all PDF about all of her encounters circulating for years (including plenty of details about MAL and references to Trump - none particularly interesting) is pathetic.
Posted on 11/12/25 at 2:09 pm to MizzouBS
You do realize that Epstein traveling with younger gals is part of the reason Trump exiled Epstein frhis property’s right. You pitiful people who look for someone grasp on are but a joke in itself
Posted on 11/12/25 at 2:16 pm to Nosevens
This board has become a bizarre collection of:
- Leftists/anti-Trump types who never cared about this until January of this year and who don't know any of the facts/legal history.
- MAGA elements who claimed it was monumental last year and who now say it is a hoax.
- Leftists/anti-Trump types who never cared about this until January of this year and who don't know any of the facts/legal history.
- MAGA elements who claimed it was monumental last year and who now say it is a hoax.
Posted on 11/12/25 at 2:17 pm to _Hurricane_
“They got him this time”
Posted on 11/12/25 at 2:20 pm to timdonaghyswhistle
Could it be both sides have a shared interest?
Posted on 11/12/25 at 2:22 pm to Hognutz
quote:
Could it be both sides have a shared interest?
No other explanation. Zero chance two administrations that hate each other just sit there and take the same PR blows and don't fight back...without some compelling interest/limitation that impacts both of them.
I think there are practical limitations that impact both. But I think if that's all it were, they'd each have tried to explain it to the public. They wouldn't just sit there and get pummeled with accusations of borderline pedophilia.
Posted on 11/12/25 at 2:27 pm to Trevaylin
quote:
Wow, ten pages of conjecture about a strategy that nobody in this group has access to. Doesn't anybody go to work anymore?
It's definitely wild that this thread has gone 10 pages, especially for something that is so obviously nothing. 11 now, apparently.
This post was edited on 11/12/25 at 2:28 pm
Posted on 11/12/25 at 2:28 pm to Pettifogger
GM never worked for Trump or MAL. GM poached a spa massage girl and it pissed Trump off as it was said JE likes very happy young girl massage endings.
Trump clubs have always had very high end spas.
JE was a member of Trump International clubs and brought GM to MAL. Trump poached a real estate deal from JE after he was asked by JE to go view the property for investment. JE was pissed, and JE was banned from his clubs after the disagreements.
As all written by Wolfe: who also said that he wanted dirt on Trump badly and never got any. So the latest NYTimes splooge is a headline w/o substance but folks like 56 and Decatur will believe it.
Notice all of the sudden posts in PT, as if it was a primary? They want MAGA /Trump erased and called a pedo. They think this will taint Vance or any Trump endorsement ever.
Trump clubs have always had very high end spas.
JE was a member of Trump International clubs and brought GM to MAL. Trump poached a real estate deal from JE after he was asked by JE to go view the property for investment. JE was pissed, and JE was banned from his clubs after the disagreements.
As all written by Wolfe: who also said that he wanted dirt on Trump badly and never got any. So the latest NYTimes splooge is a headline w/o substance but folks like 56 and Decatur will believe it.
Notice all of the sudden posts in PT, as if it was a primary? They want MAGA /Trump erased and called a pedo. They think this will taint Vance or any Trump endorsement ever.
This post was edited on 11/12/25 at 2:31 pm
Popular
Back to top



1











