Started By
Message

re: Mueller evidence shows Blackwater founder held meeting to create Trump-Russia back channel

Posted on 3/7/18 at 10:08 pm to
Posted by Vacherie Saint
Member since Aug 2015
39486 posts
Posted on 3/7/18 at 10:08 pm to
quote:

They admitted in court that they lied to the FBI about legal activity.


Fify
Posted by themunch
Earth. maybe
Member since Jan 2007
64660 posts
Posted on 3/7/18 at 10:11 pm to
obama did this before the election
Posted by Sidicous
Middle of Nowhere
Member since Aug 2015
17168 posts
Posted on 3/7/18 at 10:11 pm to
quote:



At some point you have to wonder why so many people in Hillary's orbit lied to the FBI about this one particular subject.

What information are they lying to protect, hmm?


FIFY
Posted by BamaAtl
South of North
Member since Dec 2009
21895 posts
Posted on 3/7/18 at 10:13 pm to
quote:

FIFY


Yeah, all zero guilty pleas from Hillary's camp for lying to the FBI really confirm that her people are lying to the FBI...
Posted by HailHailtoMichigan!
Mission Viejo, CA
Member since Mar 2012
69301 posts
Posted on 3/7/18 at 10:14 pm to
quote:

If anything, this makes it clearer that there was collusion in the election,
I disagree.

First off, this is about backchannels during transition period. Not at all out of ordinary for transition teams to seek backchannels. It is actually the norm.

Secondly, if you need to establish a connection with russia AFTER the election, it would seem to indicate you didn't have a stream of communication before the election.
Posted by McChowder
Hammond
Member since Dec 2006
5227 posts
Posted on 3/7/18 at 10:14 pm to
The article suggests an acknowledgement by investigators that this was the first time the two camps began communicating. This is now the worst case scenario? Lmao

The POTUS elect might have done what every predecessor before him has done and opened lines of communication with foreign governments?

Even if we accept this story to be 100% accurate, what is the crime?
Posted by CheniereTiger108
Member since Jul 2014
1609 posts
Posted on 3/7/18 at 10:17 pm to
quote:

all zero guilty pleas because they were ALL given immunity beforehand (cause innocent people need immunity deals, right) and promised that the evidence of their crimes would be destroyed by the FBI


FIFY

Oh, and “i never sent or received classified information on my server”
Posted by BamaAtl
South of North
Member since Dec 2009
21895 posts
Posted on 3/7/18 at 10:19 pm to
quote:

I disagree.


As is your right. Time will tell which of us was right - and it won't be you.

If what you're saying about this being normal were true, why the lies? What is he hiding?

And establishing another connection through Prince doesn't indicate that previous channels (be they through Manafort, Page, Stone, Flynn, Deripskaya, or others) didn't already exist.
Posted by udtiger
Over your left shoulder
Member since Nov 2006
98816 posts
Posted on 3/7/18 at 10:19 pm to
Posted by deltaland
Member since Mar 2011
90617 posts
Posted on 3/7/18 at 10:31 pm to
It was post election so not illegal
Posted by Lsuhoohoo
Member since Sep 2007
94522 posts
Posted on 3/7/18 at 10:31 pm to
quote:

a witness cooperating with Mueller


Before I click the link, has this "witness" paid or been paid by the Clintons? As seems to be the case with every cooperating party involved in this sham.
Posted by Sidicous
Middle of Nowhere
Member since Aug 2015
17168 posts
Posted on 3/7/18 at 11:03 pm to
quote:

It was post election so not illegal


It doesn't matter if it was Pre-election or even during the election...talking to Russians is not illegal, making deals with Russia or Russians is not illegal (depending on the specifics) either. Exchanging information with Russia is not illegal.

Trump could've been caught on a live mic stating "just wait till after I'm elected and I'll be free to work with you" and it would not be illegal.

Neither man nor God has declared, "thou shalt not speaketh to thine Russians, so shall it be written, so shall it be!"
Posted by antibarner
Member since Oct 2009
23716 posts
Posted on 3/7/18 at 11:21 pm to
Bob is having his day, but if any of this crap ever goes to court it might not go well for him. Someone with the means to take him on and some good attorneys will make mincemeat out of him.
This post was edited on 3/7/18 at 11:22 pm
Posted by Lsuchs
Member since Apr 2013
8073 posts
Posted on 3/7/18 at 11:47 pm to
quote:

At some point you have to wonder why so many people in Trump's orbit lied to the FBI about this one particular subject.


Should have elected Hillary, she didn’t need any help she’ll just lie to the FBI herself.
Posted by bencoleman
RIP 7/19
Member since Feb 2009
37887 posts
Posted on 3/8/18 at 6:33 am to
quote:

BamaAtl


Stop lying
Posted by t00f
Not where you think I am
Member since Jul 2016
89925 posts
Posted on 3/8/18 at 6:40 am to
Posted by Wtodd
Tampa, FL
Member since Oct 2013
67488 posts
Posted on 3/8/18 at 6:42 am to
quote:

Meeting took place during the transition

Meeting with foreign officials is SOP and NOT ILLEGAL
Posted by RCDfan1950
United States
Member since Feb 2007
34918 posts
Posted on 3/8/18 at 6:49 am to
The more that Meuller goes into the weeds investigating *collusion* (which is NOT a criminal offense), the more He incriminates His own Investigation as it IGNORES the obvious Uranium 1/HRC corruption. The whitewash of Hillary's Emails, Her funding of the fraudulent Steele Dossier in order to "wiretap" the Trump Campaign by DOJ/FBI Operatives...is a 100 ton elephant in Meuller's room.

Does Meuller really think that He can show up to Congress with a 'report' that ignores the above, and be taken seriously, or as not being part of a coverup of the which HE was a main player (U-1).

When the OIG/Horrowitz Report comes out and if it don't encompass the above and lead to a Grand Jury to subpoena these folk (Meuller included) where damning evidence is in full view...then hell will break loose. As it should.
Posted by Walkthedawg
Dawg Pound
Member since Oct 2012
11466 posts
Posted on 3/8/18 at 7:07 am to
Posted by the LSUSaint
Member since Nov 2009
15444 posts
Posted on 3/8/18 at 7:10 am to
quote:

Meeting took place during the transition.


Soooooo, basically Mueller has nothing. Now he's to the point of investigating POST election conversations?

Serious question, before Obama won, he was hot-miked telling a diplomat that he'll have more leeway after the election, and that s EXACTLY what Mueller is looking for on Trump. No investigating needed, why isn't Barak cgarged?
first pageprev pagePage 2 of 5Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram