- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Mueller Charged Russian Company Not in Existence at Time of Charge!
Posted on 5/12/18 at 8:41 pm to RockyMtnTigerWDE
Posted on 5/12/18 at 8:41 pm to RockyMtnTigerWDE
quote:The dude is just spectacularly dense.
I recognize the all to familiar problem in all of that.
My wife takes photos. When she takes them, she has a moniker she applies to them. But, she's not incorporated in any way.
If 2 years from now, she incorporates under the moniker as an official company name.........and then, they charge THAT COMPANY with a crime that occurred in 2018, they will have literally charged nobody.
Poor Juice.
0
Posted on 5/12/18 at 8:42 pm to IllegalPete
quote:If that's the case, that's even more awesome!!!
that is not a separate business entity but was charged as well, to make it appear that there were more indictments.
Posted on 5/12/18 at 8:42 pm to ShortyRob
quote:
Yeah. I tried to make that point but it was too complex for Juice to grasp apparently. If you indict something BY NAME.......that didn't exist by that name when said crime was committed.....then by definition, you indicted no one. It's like indicting me for something that happened before I was born.
Yep!
Posted on 5/12/18 at 8:44 pm to JuiceTerry
quote:
Because it's not pertinent
Posted on 5/12/18 at 8:44 pm to JuiceTerry
quote:
Couple of questions for you, bot..
Why did we only see what Concord's lawyer said? I mean, they obviously have the whole transcript
And secondly, would you believe what Concord themselves said about when they came into existence? Would you take them at their word?
I actually laughed at this.
Wow. You are really struggling.
Posted on 5/12/18 at 8:45 pm to moneyg
quote:
I actually laughed at this.
Wow. You are really struggling.
Juice has taken a mildly humorous thread and turned in to a fully glorious one!
Posted on 5/12/18 at 8:48 pm to ShortyRob
Poor Juice.
Now he's desperately scouring liberal pages for what his next idea for what his rebuttal should be.
Coming up empty.
Now he's desperately scouring liberal pages for what his next idea for what his rebuttal should be.
Coming up empty.
Posted on 5/12/18 at 8:51 pm to IllegalPete
quote:It's the same people
I see where you are coming from. There is obviously a Russian Concord Catering company if your link is accurate.
My best guess would be that the Concord Catering in your link has nothing to do with Concord Management or any Russians involved with twitter trolling.
Posted on 5/12/18 at 9:05 pm to JuiceTerry
quote:
It's the same people
It's sloppy work from the most highly paid, elite and professional Federal prosecutors in the world. Mueller will have to amend the indictment. Any honest judge would be rolling his eyes at this clusterfrick.
Posted on 5/12/18 at 9:06 pm to JuiceTerry
quote:
Do you not find it weird, though, that the lawyer said definitively that the business didn't exist, made a ham sandwich joke, and then said "but if the government shows me they did exist at the time, yes I would represent them"?
Not weird at all to me.
Posted on 5/12/18 at 9:19 pm to JuiceTerry
Hahahahahaha, Juice
OMG. This is priceless. And the very reason their lawyer was so damn cocky in court. Shoddy work by team Mueller
LINK
quote:
Concord-catering.ru is tracked by us since April, 2011. Over the time it has been ranked as high as 1,419,909 in the world, while most of its traffic comes from Russian Federation, where it reached as high as 120,297 position. All this time it was owned by "Concord Management and Consulting" ltd., it was hosted by Masterhost.ru
OMG. This is priceless. And the very reason their lawyer was so damn cocky in court. Shoddy work by team Mueller
LINK
Posted on 5/12/18 at 9:30 pm to Iowa Golfer
quote:
Damn it, someone explain that lit match thrown in the shower meme to me please?
It's a bottle rocket, fool.
Posted on 5/12/18 at 9:33 pm to BBONDS25
quote:
Kickadawg has been all over a catering company being indicted. He said it meant something big. He won't like this at all.
He was right though, it does mean something big. It means this isn't just a witch hunt, but it's an amateur one.
Posted on 5/12/18 at 9:36 pm to JuiceTerry
quote:
It's the same people
Irrelevant. A company that didn't exist at the time is being named in this. It's legally impossible for a legal entity to be considered guilty for something that happened before it was created.
Posted on 5/12/18 at 9:37 pm to Bard
Anyone have a campaign finance report?
Posted on 5/12/18 at 9:37 pm to Kickadawgitfeelsgood
Post it or pipe down.
This post was edited on 5/12/18 at 9:38 pm
Posted on 5/12/18 at 9:43 pm to Bard
quote:The same people are still under indictment
It's the same people
Irrelevant. A company that didn't exist at the time is being named in this. It's legally impossible for a legal entity to be considered guilty for something that happened before it was created.
Posted on 5/12/18 at 9:49 pm to JuiceTerry
It’s clearly a separate indictment against a legal entity which did not exist.
Concord Management is already indicted and is being represented. Concord Catering is simply a tradename and not actually a subsidiary of Concord Management it appears. Since they are not an independent legal entity they cannot be indicted.
Muellers team (or the prosecutor) is incompetent if they didn’t know this or willfully doing this to inflate their Indictment count in the hopes that no one would call their bluff.
At best it’s bad optics and at worst it’s misleading and undermines the integrity of the special counsel.
Edit: changed subsidiary wording
And: Note Wikipedia lists them as a subsidiary but nowhere else can I find the distinct link
Concord Management is already indicted and is being represented. Concord Catering is simply a tradename and not actually a subsidiary of Concord Management it appears. Since they are not an independent legal entity they cannot be indicted.
Muellers team (or the prosecutor) is incompetent if they didn’t know this or willfully doing this to inflate their Indictment count in the hopes that no one would call their bluff.
At best it’s bad optics and at worst it’s misleading and undermines the integrity of the special counsel.
Edit: changed subsidiary wording
And: Note Wikipedia lists them as a subsidiary but nowhere else can I find the distinct link
This post was edited on 5/12/18 at 10:04 pm
Posted on 5/12/18 at 9:50 pm to Kickadawgitfeelsgood
quote:
Anyone have a campaign finance report?
Or maybe foreign donors to the Clinton Foundation just prior to the campaign?
Oh wait...
Someone allowed the Clinton Foundation to not report their foreign donors. That same someone used his office to send a Cease & Desist to the Trump campaign to stop fundraising activities in the state of New York then also said they had no reason to stop Hillary from doing so. That same someone said there was no reason to investigate into the Clinton Foundation's foreign donations (ya know, the ones he didn't make them report).
LINK
Who-oh-who could that someone be???
It certainly is a head-scratcher.
This post was edited on 5/12/18 at 9:51 pm
Posted on 5/12/18 at 10:29 pm to Iowa Golfer
It’s a bottle rocket.
Page 5 of 6
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News