- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
0
Posted on 5/12/18 at 6:58 pm to Jjdoc
Couple of questions for you, bot..
Why did we only see what Concord's lawyer said? I mean, they obviously have the whole transcript
And secondly, would you believe what Concord themselves said about when they came into existence? Would you take them at their word?
Why did we only see what Concord's lawyer said? I mean, they obviously have the whole transcript
And secondly, would you believe what Concord themselves said about when they came into existence? Would you take them at their word?
Posted on 5/12/18 at 7:02 pm to JuiceTerry
quote:
Couple of questions for you, bot..
Why did we only see what Concord's lawyer said? I mean, they obviously have the whole transcript
And secondly, would you believe what Concord themselves said about when they came into existence? Would you take them at their word?
It's all coming to an end. Beg!
Posted on 5/12/18 at 7:04 pm to Bunyan
You take downvoting so seriously
Posted on 5/12/18 at 7:05 pm to Jjdoc
Just more proof that this batch of indictments was 100% for show only.
They literally fricking indicted a goddamned ham sandwich.
They literally fricking indicted a goddamned ham sandwich.
Posted on 5/12/18 at 7:05 pm to olddawg26
quote:
You take downvoting so seriously
downvote
Posted on 5/12/18 at 7:07 pm to JuiceTerry
quote:
Couple of questions for you, bot..
Why did we only see what Concord's lawyer said? I mean, they obviously have the whole transcript
And secondly, would you believe what Concord themselves said about when they came into existence? Would you take them at their word?
Posted on 5/12/18 at 7:11 pm to JuiceTerry
quote:
Couple of questions for you, bot..
Why did we only see what Concord's lawyer said? I mean, they obviously have the whole transcript
And secondly, would you believe what Concord themselves said about when they came into existence? Would you take them at their word?
This reeks of desperation.
This post was edited on 5/12/18 at 7:12 pm
Posted on 5/12/18 at 7:14 pm to Sidicous
You’re in so much despair that you bring up Trump university. Have you done you daily sky screaming routine? I’ve heard that helps the mentally unstable. 
Posted on 5/12/18 at 7:15 pm to imjustafatkid
quote:Especially when the lawyer is literally there to represent everyone involved.......he even says, "yeah, I'll represent them if the govt can show they existed"
This reeks of desperation.
Basically, attorney saying, "I can't represent them.........cause whomever it is the govt charged, they can't be it cause they didn't exist".
It's kinda like the govt charging ShortRob with a crime that was committed 52 years ago.
ShortyRob is 51........so, how can a lawyer represent THIS ShortyRob? Must be another ShortRob they're talking about!
This post was edited on 5/12/18 at 7:17 pm
Posted on 5/12/18 at 7:29 pm to Jjdoc
Posted on 5/12/18 at 7:29 pm to ShortyRob
Poor Juice. All he could do was down vote and run like a bitch.
Posted on 5/12/18 at 7:31 pm to ShortyRob
Lol You care to answer the questions or are you just all aboard the jjbot fake news bandwagon nowadays?
Sad
Sad
Posted on 5/12/18 at 7:33 pm to JuiceTerry
I don’t think many lawyers go on record lying to the judge in the court room - at least not with clear, concise statements such as the one of which this thread is subject
Posted on 5/12/18 at 7:50 pm to Jjdoc
This post was edited on 5/12/18 at 7:52 pm
Posted on 5/12/18 at 7:51 pm to JuiceTerry
quote:I did answer them. Then all you did was downvote and run like a bitch.
Lol You care to answer the questions or are you just all aboard the jjbot fake news bandwagon nowadays?
And, now dodge.
Not unexpected.
Posted on 5/12/18 at 7:55 pm to JuiceTerry
I'd be interested to see the response and the entire transcript too. However, it is a private practice American lawyer stating bluntly to a federal judge something that is easily verifiable. I'm not sure this is the battle you want to fight.
I've seen lawyers flat out lie to judges before...but that is a very risky move in such a high profile case with such an easily verifiable fact.
I've seen lawyers flat out lie to judges before...but that is a very risky move in such a high profile case with such an easily verifiable fact.
This post was edited on 5/12/18 at 7:56 pm
Posted on 5/12/18 at 7:58 pm to BBONDS25
quote:Especially given he's not even trying to get out of representing them.
I've seen lawyers flat out lie to judges before...but that is a very risky move in such a high profile case with such an easily verifiable fact.
When asked, he said he'll represent them if it turns out they actually existed.
And the dude is requesting speedy trial.
So yeah. There's basically nothing pointing to a reason to lie about such a thing.
Posted on 5/12/18 at 7:58 pm to loogaroo
What's the deal with throwing a lit match in the shower?
Posted on 5/12/18 at 7:59 pm to BBONDS25
Page 2 of 6
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News