- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: More and more Americans polled think it's time to repeal the Second Amendment
Posted on 3/27/18 at 7:28 pm to mountaintop
Posted on 3/27/18 at 7:28 pm to mountaintop
Well, I don't think it will ever happen. I think we may get to a situation where several cities ban firearms, maybe a state like California or Massachusetts will even challenge the 2A on a statewide basis and lose, but that's about it.
The cities that ban will get their own taste of all the success other cities like Chicago, Detroit, and Baltimore have had, taking guns from the law abiding, and the sane ones will vote those who don't respect the Constitution out.
As a matter of fact, I'd wholeheartedly support a federal law that bans all firearms of any kind, in any city with 100k or more people, including the police. Yeah, blood would run like a river for a while, but it would almost be worth it to see every Democrat from Bill Clinton, to Pelosi, to Schumer, to Feinstein, to Debbie Wasserschultz begging for the 2A to be reinstated and for law abiding gun owners to come back and save their shitholes, wouldn't it?
The cities that ban will get their own taste of all the success other cities like Chicago, Detroit, and Baltimore have had, taking guns from the law abiding, and the sane ones will vote those who don't respect the Constitution out.
As a matter of fact, I'd wholeheartedly support a federal law that bans all firearms of any kind, in any city with 100k or more people, including the police. Yeah, blood would run like a river for a while, but it would almost be worth it to see every Democrat from Bill Clinton, to Pelosi, to Schumer, to Feinstein, to Debbie Wasserschultz begging for the 2A to be reinstated and for law abiding gun owners to come back and save their shitholes, wouldn't it?
0
Posted on 3/27/18 at 7:37 pm to mountaintop
quote:
I support assault weapons ban
quote:Theres no difference.
I will not accept a repeal of the Second Amendment.
Posted on 3/27/18 at 7:52 pm to ILeaveAtHalftime
quote:
I want to say the AR15 is the most popular gun in America.
I don't know,there are a shitload of Marlin model 60s out there.
Posted on 3/27/18 at 8:01 pm to GeauxxxTigers23
Explain why there is NO difference.
Posted on 3/27/18 at 8:01 pm to mountaintop
quote:
I support assault weapons ban
Well frick you too
Posted on 3/27/18 at 8:02 pm to mountaintop
quote:
I support assault weapons ban
You’re part of the problem.
Posted on 3/27/18 at 8:03 pm to mountaintop
quote:21% huh? Well if it can get that support to move from 1/5 to 2/3 then maybe it's worth considering since 2/3 is the magic number in the senate, house, and the the states. And in reality it's 66.6% of the House, 67% of the senate, and 68% of the states. So they better get that support to closer to 80% maybe even 90% to expect not only an amendment but an amendment that repeals a bill of rights amendment.
Twenty-one percent said they favored such a proposal, compared with 60 percent in opposition.
quote:Besides the random number and the fact that our representatives often do a poor job of representing things that have support across parties, someone seems to not understand that we have a “representative democracy” not a “direct democracy.”
Considering that our current “democracy” seems to be based on popular opinions of about 33 percent of the public, that isn’t so bad.
Posted on 3/27/18 at 8:05 pm to mountaintop
An "assault waepons" ban would lead to effectively a repeal of the second amendment you god damn idiot.
Posted on 3/27/18 at 8:07 pm to mountaintop
quote:
Explain why there is NO difference.
quote:
quote: Why did Nick Cruz have to mow down 17 people in that fashion?
=======================
What "fashion" is that??
=============
Can you answer my question (above) first?
Thanks.
Posted on 3/27/18 at 8:08 pm to mountaintop
quote:Obviously we've drawn a line between arms and other weapons (like a bazooka), but when the text says "shall not be infringed," then banning some type of arms would be an infringement and therefore require the original amendment to be repealed and replaced with a qualifier like "except for assault weapons."
Explain why there is NO difference.
This post was edited on 3/27/18 at 8:18 pm
Posted on 3/27/18 at 8:11 pm to buckeye_vol
quote:
"except for assault weapons."
Describe an "assault weapon" and what components and operation have it differ from a common hunting rifle.
Thanks in advance!
Posted on 3/27/18 at 8:12 pm to mountaintop
Northeasterner.... frick you, your opinion and all of your ilk
This post was edited on 3/27/18 at 9:39 pm
Posted on 3/27/18 at 8:18 pm to Dale51
quote:Well I'm not the one advocating for it, so why are you asking me to define it?
Describe an "assault weapon" and what components and operation have it differ from a common hunting rifle.
Thanks in advance!
Posted on 3/27/18 at 8:21 pm to mountaintop
quote:
Explain why there is NO difference
That’s not how it works. Since the OP, you have been asked repeatedly to define “assault weapon” and what differentiates an AR 15 from a hunting rifle that uses the same caliber ammunition. You have failed to do so.
You’re the one who wants “assault weapons” banned. The obligation is on you to define what an assault weapon is, not for others to explain to you why no such definition exists.
If you want them banned, you should have no trouble clearly articulating a fact-based answer to that question. “They look scary” and “that’s what Nicholas Cruz used” are simply not sufficient to support your conclusion.
This post was edited on 3/27/18 at 8:23 pm
Posted on 3/27/18 at 8:25 pm to mountaintop
America has always had a small percentage of dipshit douchebags who believe any and all leftist horse manure. For 240 years.
Your link is a leftist rag with a radical fricktard writing the "story"
Your link is a leftist rag with a radical fricktard writing the "story"
Posted on 3/27/18 at 8:28 pm to buckeye_vol
quote:
Well I'm not the one advocating for it, so why are you asking me to define it?
So you have no opinion on it one way or the other?
Fine. What is your description of it? Doesn't matter one way or the other to you, so no pressure. How would you describe an "assault weapon"?
Posted on 3/27/18 at 8:36 pm to mountaintop
quote:
I am a Northeasterner, I support assault weapons ban
Go frick yourself.
Posted on 3/27/18 at 8:47 pm to Lsuchs
quote:
Handguns were used in 19 times as many murders than rifles were in 2016, according to the Uniform Crime Reporting data.”
So if you don’t support ARs being around you shouldn’t support handguns either, right? So what do you support, it’s not the 2nd amendment as you claim
The dems already know this, and know that a outright ban of everything semi auto is impossible right now. But, if they can get the AR ban than next will be handguns using your exact argument. “We banned ARs and that’s great but handguns kill way more people! They need to go!”
Posted on 3/27/18 at 8:48 pm to mountaintop
(no message)
This post was edited on 3/27/18 at 8:51 pm
Posted on 3/27/18 at 9:04 pm to mountaintop
Too bad and I hope they try!!! 
Page 4 of 5
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News