- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: MO governor indicted for felony invasion of privacy
Posted on 2/22/18 at 4:54 pm to SlowFlowPro
Posted on 2/22/18 at 4:54 pm to SlowFlowPro
Best part about this, the Idiot Circuit Attorney for St.Louis City, is an incompetent Boob. She's lost 4 murder cases, and numerous other slam dunk cases since taking office.
This is a power play by Progressives and idiot St.Louis Liberals.
He already has a great lawyer on retainer, and when he gets off, there will be hell to pay for this CA moron, and the St.Louis Dems.
They have always been laughed at, by rest of state, even the KC liberals laugh at them. Former Governor and Democrat, jay Nixon refused to even meet with them, he pretty much called them useless.
This is a power play by Progressives and idiot St.Louis Liberals.
He already has a great lawyer on retainer, and when he gets off, there will be hell to pay for this CA moron, and the St.Louis Dems.
They have always been laughed at, by rest of state, even the KC liberals laugh at them. Former Governor and Democrat, jay Nixon refused to even meet with them, he pretty much called them useless.
1
Posted on 2/22/18 at 4:54 pm to NIH
quote:
The amount of good oppo research and blackmail material on my generation's politicians will be insane.
We're all dirty though, so it's going to send up a wash.
Posted on 2/22/18 at 4:55 pm to SeeeeK
quote:
Best part about this, the Idiot Circuit Attorney for St.Louis City, is an incompetent Boob. She's lost 4 murder cases, and numerous other slam dunk cases since taking office.
This is a power play by Progressives and idiot St.Louis Liberals.
i'm not saying that. we just live in a police state with WAY too many criminal laws
but, on this note, whatever happened to ole Rick Perry and that indictment while he was Governor?
Posted on 2/22/18 at 4:56 pm to Iosh
any dirty Sanchez swastikas mentioned?
Posted on 2/22/18 at 4:58 pm to Duke
quote:
We're all dirty though, so it's going to send up a wash.
no one on this earth owns a dick pic of SFP
Posted on 2/22/18 at 4:59 pm to Iosh
Just for clarity here again because maybe I'm missing an element
If I understand this story correctly I'm supposed to have sympathy for the woman who wanted to expose her private relationship with a person in order to harm him
But I'm not supposed to have sympathy for a man who threatened to expose an element of that relationship in order to prevent her from doing so?
I mean I really don't have sympathy for either one but can someone explain to me why one of the above is worse than the other?
If I understand this story correctly I'm supposed to have sympathy for the woman who wanted to expose her private relationship with a person in order to harm him
But I'm not supposed to have sympathy for a man who threatened to expose an element of that relationship in order to prevent her from doing so?
I mean I really don't have sympathy for either one but can someone explain to me why one of the above is worse than the other?
Posted on 2/22/18 at 4:59 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:Did you miss the "blindfolded and handcuffed" part
as long as she knew the photo was being taken at the time
Posted on 2/22/18 at 5:00 pm to Iosh
quote:
Did you miss the "blindfolded and handcuffed" part
did you miss me call it a bondage photo?
bookmark the thread. i'll give you 3:1 on a $10 bet by me that it's a bondage situation
Posted on 2/22/18 at 5:00 pm to ShortyRob
quote:You're missing an element
Just for clarity here again because maybe I'm missing an element
If I understand this story correctly I'm supposed to have sympathy for the woman who wanted to expose her private relationship with a person
Posted on 2/22/18 at 5:01 pm to Iosh
quote:
You're missing an element
Go on
Posted on 2/22/18 at 5:01 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:I'm sure it is a bondage situation, the fact that he's being indicted for invasion of privacy and not kidnapping is evidence enough
did you miss me call it a bondage photo?
bookmark the thread. i'll give you 3:1 on a $10 bet by me that it's a bondage situation
But someone can consent to being blindfolded and tied up without necessarily consenting to being photographed as such
Posted on 2/22/18 at 5:02 pm to ShortyRob
i'm assuming that missing part is what iosh and i disagreed with above. his assumption is that the photo was taken under force, while mine is that it's just an embarrassing bondage photo
Posted on 2/22/18 at 5:03 pm to Iosh
quote:
But someone can consent to being blindfolded and tied up without necessarily consenting to being photographed as such
again. don't think that's the case
there's probably a 25% chance (ETA: AT LEAST) he didn't even take the photo
This post was edited on 2/22/18 at 5:03 pm
Posted on 2/22/18 at 5:04 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
i'm assuming that missing part is what iosh and i disagreed with above. his assumption is that the photo was taken under force, while mine is that it's just an embarrassing bondage photo
I see no indication that the photo was taken under Force. At best it would appear that maybe she could argue she didn't know the photo was being taken
It seems a virtual certainty the blindfold and bondage was no accident. Otherwise he would be getting charged with a different crime
Posted on 2/22/18 at 5:06 pm to SlowFlowPro
The missing part is the woman did not threaten anyone with anything and has not spoken to the press. The entire story came to light because her ex secretly recorded her talking about Greitens threatening to release the photo. LINK
quote:
Woman: “He stepped back, I saw a flash through the blindfold and he said: "you're never going to mention my name, otherwise there will be pictures of me everywhere."
Posted on 2/22/18 at 5:06 pm to Iosh
quote:
sure it is a bondage situation, the fact that he's being indicted for invasion of privacy and not kidnapping is evidence enough
But someone can consent to being blindfolded and tied up without necessarily consenting to being photographed as such
Well someone can consent to fricking you without consenting to you broadcasting it across the nation either
Hence the point of my post asking what the frick is the difference
She tried to take private behavior and go public with it and he tried to take private behavior and go public with it
Moreover the proximate cause of him wanting to go public with his evidence was her threatening to go public first
Here's a thought. If you can sensually frick someone then going public with it later to harm them is as much revenge porn as showing a picture of it
Posted on 2/22/18 at 5:08 pm to Iosh
quote:
Woman: “He stepped back, I saw a flash through the blindfold and he said: "you're never going to mention my name, otherwise there will be pictures of me everywhere
Okay. Tell me why this is supposed to bother me given that she clearly was there consensually?
I'm sorry it's about time women stop being treated like they're fricking infants
She fricked him. She wanted to frick him. She knew who he was. She knew it was inappropriate or at least might be viewed that way
Posted on 2/22/18 at 5:09 pm to ShortyRob
I'm just going to newsflash everybody under the age of 75
In the age of the smartphone if you choose to frick somebody and they tie you up and blindfold you there's a pretty damn good chance your pictures getting taken
In the age of the smartphone if you choose to frick somebody and they tie you up and blindfold you there's a pretty damn good chance your pictures getting taken
Posted on 2/22/18 at 5:09 pm to ShortyRob
quote:The consensual fricking, however kinky, is not the issue. The photograph and threat to release is. You obviously think so too or you wouldn't have invented to yourself a backstory where she threatened him first and thereby justified him when you failed to read the article.
Okay. Tell me why this is supposed to bother me given that she clearly was there consensually?
Posted on 2/22/18 at 5:10 pm to Iosh
They said we wouldn't fit in.
They said the cultural differences were too great.
Bama had their Luv Gov.
We countered .
Take that SEC !
Page 2 of 3
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News