- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: MN AG Ellison sues TX Gov Abbott to extradite ICE agent
Posted on 8/18/26 at 5:54 pm to MSMHater
Posted on 8/18/26 at 5:54 pm to MSMHater
quote:
Cameron County, so TX. Been there since May. Weird that Abbott hasn't let him go yet, right?
I don’t think it’s that weird. This looks like an unusual case where a federal interest needs to be resolved. And in this case a federal judge is being asked to declare to the Governor what the Constitution requires him to do.
It should be resolved soon. We can wait.
Posted on 8/18/26 at 5:59 pm to CubsFanBudMan
quote:
Is he currently in Texas custody? Is MN asking TX to hunt him down then extradite him? I'm ignorant of the situation.
If he was in TX custody, he'd have a basis.
He cannot compel Texas hunt him down and arrest him.
He needs to speak to the US Marshals
Posted on 8/18/26 at 6:12 pm to BTROleMisser
quote:
Yeah, man. I'm sure it went down exactly they way the commie leftists claim it went down. Yup. "Dindu nuffin!"
Some of y'all just hate facts:
-ICE agent Castro lied about bring assaulted (see video below)...the justification he claimed for discharging his weapon
-ICE---not "Commie leftists"---has admitted that the facts as alleged against Castro
-Castro shot an innocent man through a closed door of a residence with a several people in it including a child
-Texas arrested Castro and is still holding him on the Minnesota warrant
Video Showing Castro Lied
Posted on 8/18/26 at 6:32 pm to udtiger
quote:
If he was in TX custody, he'd have a basis.
He cannot compel Texas hunt him down and arrest him.
He needs to speak to the US Marshals
What are you talking about??? This is pretty boilerplate stuff. Minnesota has already compelled Texas to hunt him down in Texas.
Pursuant to the Minnesota warrant, Texas Rangers arrested Castro in May. He remains in jail in Texas and will be returned to Minnesota to face charges.
This post was edited on 8/18/26 at 6:33 pm
Posted on 8/18/26 at 6:32 pm to IvoryBillMatt
If a person wanted by another state refuses to waive extradition, then the state has to get a governors warrant. Once governor abbott signs off on the governors warrant, the person goes back to whatever state wants him. It looks like abbott isn't signing. Minnesota is stuck out. They need to quit persecuting ICE agents.
Posted on 8/18/26 at 6:35 pm to Don Quixote
The main issue is no one thinks an ICE agent would get a fair trial in Minneapolis. Ellison wants a lynching. Texas will tell MN to go frick yourselves.
Posted on 8/18/26 at 6:36 pm to Don Quixote
Abbot should declare Texas an 'Ice Sanctuary State'. Fire with fire. Force the Supreme Court to come out from under their desks.
Posted on 8/18/26 at 6:36 pm to uggabugga
quote:
Screw Keef, that useless 'teefer member.
Posted on 8/18/26 at 6:38 pm to IvoryBillMatt
Texas could have told Minnesota to frick off about arresting him.
However,
If he is in custody, that's different.
However,
quote:
Texas Rangers arrested Castro in May. He remains in jail in Texas and will be returned to Minnesota to face charges
If he is in custody, that's different.
Posted on 8/18/26 at 6:43 pm to texas tortilla
quote:
It looks like abbott isn't signing. Minnesota is stuck out. They need to quit persecuting ICE agents.
Weird that people are sticking up for THIS ICE agent. He lied about the incident to his superiors.
At any rate, the Constitution and Supreme Court case law make this a slam dunk. Castro is going back to Minnesota. [Obnoxiously, I did my Masters thesis on extradition/rendition under Article IV of the Constitution.]
If you're actually interested in the law on this, read Puerto Rico v Branstad:
"In Puerto Rico v. Branstad, Iowa Governor Terry Branstad refused to extradite Ronald Calder, who was wanted in Puerto Rico for serious criminal charges. Puerto Rico went to federal court seeking an order compelling Iowa to surrender Calder.
The Supreme Court held that a state has a mandatory constitutional duty to extradite a fugitive when the requirements of the Extradition Clause are satisfied, and federal courts can enforce that duty. The Court expressly overruled the contrary portion of Kentucky v. Dennison (1861)."
Posted on 8/18/26 at 6:45 pm to udtiger
quote:
If he is in custody, that's different.
Yup.
Posted on 8/18/26 at 6:49 pm to udtiger
You should be able to get a bond on an extradition charge. Is he still in jail? If abbott isn't doing the governors warrant then he should be released since the charge they are holding him is called Fugitive from justice. Could he have texas charges keeping him in jail?
Posted on 8/18/26 at 7:02 pm to texas tortilla
quote:
You should be able to get a bond on an extradition charge. Is he still in jail? If abbott isn't doing the governors warrant then he should be released since the charge they are holding him is called Fugitive from justice. Could he have texas charges keeping him in jail?
Will look to confirm (and correct if I'm wrong), but he is still incarcerated and....
-$200,000 bond
-no Texas charges
Posted on 8/18/26 at 7:05 pm to texas tortilla
Lazy way out:)
On June 4, a Minnesota judge set Castro's bond at $200,000. A Texas report quoted his attorney as saying Castro could be released if he posted that bond, but he would then have to appear in Minnesota for arraignment. ?
KRGV +1
He apparently has not posted the bond. As of today, August 18, he remains in the Cameron County Jail. Minnesota's new federal lawsuit specifically asks the court to prevent Texas officials from releasing him. ?
KRGV +1
The immediate problem for Minnesota is that Texas law limits how long someone can be held solely on the fugitive/extradition process. Minnesota says Castro is approaching—or has reached—the 90-day point and could therefore be released. ?
Reuters +1
What if he posts the $200,000 bond?
This is the particularly interesting part.
Posting the Minnesota criminal bond would not itself make the Minnesota criminal case disappear or prevent Minnesota from prosecuting him. It would mean Castro is released from the Texas jail while awaiting the next steps.
But, according to the Texas reporting, the arrangement contemplated at the June 4 hearing was that if Castro posted bond, he would have to go to Minnesota himself for arraignment. ?
KRGV
The problem is enforcement. If Castro is released in Texas and doesn't voluntarily go to Minnesota, Minnesota would still have its outstanding warrant. But Texas could no longer simply keep him in the Cameron County jail indefinitely on the existing extradition hold.
That's why Minnesota filed today's federal lawsuit. It is asking the federal court to stop Cameron County from releasing Castro and compel Governor Abbott to complete the extradition. Minnesota specifically argues that release creates a flight risk because Castro has discussed relocating to Mexico, and Cameron County is right on the border. ?
On June 4, a Minnesota judge set Castro's bond at $200,000. A Texas report quoted his attorney as saying Castro could be released if he posted that bond, but he would then have to appear in Minnesota for arraignment. ?
KRGV +1
He apparently has not posted the bond. As of today, August 18, he remains in the Cameron County Jail. Minnesota's new federal lawsuit specifically asks the court to prevent Texas officials from releasing him. ?
KRGV +1
The immediate problem for Minnesota is that Texas law limits how long someone can be held solely on the fugitive/extradition process. Minnesota says Castro is approaching—or has reached—the 90-day point and could therefore be released. ?
Reuters +1
What if he posts the $200,000 bond?
This is the particularly interesting part.
Posting the Minnesota criminal bond would not itself make the Minnesota criminal case disappear or prevent Minnesota from prosecuting him. It would mean Castro is released from the Texas jail while awaiting the next steps.
But, according to the Texas reporting, the arrangement contemplated at the June 4 hearing was that if Castro posted bond, he would have to go to Minnesota himself for arraignment. ?
KRGV
The problem is enforcement. If Castro is released in Texas and doesn't voluntarily go to Minnesota, Minnesota would still have its outstanding warrant. But Texas could no longer simply keep him in the Cameron County jail indefinitely on the existing extradition hold.
That's why Minnesota filed today's federal lawsuit. It is asking the federal court to stop Cameron County from releasing Castro and compel Governor Abbott to complete the extradition. Minnesota specifically argues that release creates a flight risk because Castro has discussed relocating to Mexico, and Cameron County is right on the border. ?
Posted on 8/18/26 at 7:06 pm to IvoryBillMatt
Texas can hold him for 90 days. Ellison knows this, the suit is all chicken shite for show.
He'll will prolly be released some time next week or, at the latest, the end of the month without Abbott signing anything.
He'll will prolly be released some time next week or, at the latest, the end of the month without Abbott signing anything.
Posted on 8/18/26 at 7:19 pm to FATBOY TIGER
If texas doesn't extradite, the Minnesota charge will go back into ncic as an open warrant. Good until executed. It will be a pain in the arse for the ice agent and will restrict his movement.
This post was edited on 8/18/26 at 7:20 pm
Posted on 8/18/26 at 7:20 pm to Don Quixote
The federal court in Texas is going to tell that Muslim scumbag to go screw himself.
This post was edited on 8/18/26 at 8:08 pm
Posted on 8/18/26 at 7:24 pm to FATBOY TIGER
Posted on 8/18/26 at 7:40 pm to Tchefuncte Tiger
quote:
The federal court in Texas is going to tell that Muslim scumbag to go frick himself.
There's no way that will happen. The judge is going to find in Minnesota's favor.
The interesting thing will be if Abbott and/or the Sheriff appeal that decision, and get a stay. Texas law allows an additional 60 days for fugitives to be held under court order....but what happens if the appeals process isn't completed by then?
Ultimately, this could be a fun constitutional issue...and lead to a breakdown in interstate rendition.
Posted on 8/18/26 at 7:41 pm to TheHarahanian
quote:
This is where Ellison finds out even bird fingers are larger in Texas.
Popular
Back to top


0




