Started By
Message

re: Missouri cop was badly beaten before shooting Michael Brown, says source

Posted on 8/20/14 at 7:04 pm to
Posted by John McClane
Member since Apr 2010
37180 posts
Posted on 8/20/14 at 7:04 pm to
I believe he was being sarcastic.
Posted by Wolfhound45
Member since Nov 2009
127377 posts
Posted on 8/20/14 at 7:05 pm to
quote:

I believe he was being sarcastic.


Thanks. If he is being sarcastic then my apologies. Will ETA.
Posted by DeathValley85
Member since May 2011
19256 posts
Posted on 8/20/14 at 7:08 pm to
quote:

ETA: If you are being sarcastic then my apologies. If not, I stand by what I said.


Definite sarcasm
Posted by a want
I love everybody
Member since Oct 2010
19771 posts
Posted on 8/20/14 at 7:10 pm to
quote:

And I don't trust the Ferguson PD.

I don't either. But I trust them more than I trust someone who just robbed a freaking convenience store.

I have confidence that this isn't a black/white issue - I think there's a lot of gray. But if I put myself in the cop's shoes - and I have a wife and 2 children, and a 6'4" 290 pound young man charges me (who just broke my eye socket). I'm going to unload my gun even if the first shot is fatal.

We've lost our fricking minds in this country. We expect perfection from law enforcement, but give the benefit of the doubt to thieves. It's ridiculous!


Posted by Wolfhound45
Member since Nov 2009
127377 posts
Posted on 8/20/14 at 7:16 pm to
quote:

Definite sarcasm


My sincerest apologies.
Posted by Wolfhound45
Member since Nov 2009
127377 posts
Posted on 8/20/14 at 7:19 pm to
quote:

We expect perfection from law enforcement, but give the benefit of the doubt to thieves. It's ridiculous!


Posted by F150
Member since Aug 2014
9 posts
Posted on 8/20/14 at 7:22 pm to
I agree. The preliminary autopsy reports are very telling. Can't wait to see how to those celebs that were pressured into speaking out about Ferguson are going to save face now that the facts are coming out.
Posted by LSUgusto
Member since May 2005
19311 posts
Posted on 8/20/14 at 7:33 pm to
quote:

How does someone with periorbital facial fractures look on cell phone video IYO?
The cell phone video isn't good enough to tell what he looked like, which is exactly what I pointed out.

But, I'd think he, who was just beaten to near unconsciousness with a broken eye socket, would be interested in getting medical attention, documenting the injury, or simply stepping aside from the action while his buddies secured the scene, rather than standing over the body of the guy he just killed.
Posted by infantry1026
Louisiana
Member since Jan 2010
8247 posts
Posted on 8/20/14 at 7:49 pm to
quote:

My wife and I got in to a spirited debate last night. She insisted cops are trained to shoot for the legs to drop someone and this he was shooting to kill since all of his gunshot wounds were high.


I am a Cop, and no offense but your wife is an idiot. We are not trained to shoot for the legs to drop someone.

In a situation like what has been reported (whether accurately or not).

The reported situation is that the subject attacked the officer inside of the vehicle and attempted to disarm him. (Right then in that moment the officer could have shot and killed the suspect and it would have been a "good shoot").

But the Suspect fled, and the cop (rightfully so) gave chase while ordering the suspect to surrender.

Suspect then turned and proceeded to charge the cop. Remember that the suspect has already injured the cop and attempted to disarm him. With that in mind the suspect is charging him, so he did what he was trained to do and stop the threat.

With adrenaline pumping and a reported facial injury....the cop's accuracy was understandably affected.

What everyone needs to remember is that all of the facts have not been released yet (nor should they be during an investigation).

From everything that I have read so far.....it appears to be a "good shoot". BUT as I have stated.....all of the facts are not in. If the officer did commit an unjustified homicide....he should and will answer for it.

Another thing people need to understand is that this is not a fricking TV show or a movie. Life and death situations such as these play out at a very rapid pace. A split second hesitation and the suspect could disarm an officer, and you could be watching a law enforcement funeral play out on national television. So please remember that most law enforcement officers have families that they love and want to go home in one peace to as well.

Remember that this situation could have all been avoided if Brown had not conducted himself in such a manner.

quote:

BobBoucher


I forgot to add that I was sorry to hear that you didn't get any.......that always sucks when it happens to me as well. I feel your pain brother
This post was edited on 8/20/14 at 8:28 pm
Posted by tiger91
In my own little world
Member since Nov 2005
40227 posts
Posted on 8/20/14 at 8:02 pm to
Discussing this on FOX now. Witness came forward ... "something didn't look right" ... "solid proof that Brown actually touched the officer's gun".

Posted by okietiger13
From Sea to Shining Sea
Member since Jan 2007
10271 posts
Posted on 8/20/14 at 8:17 pm to
quote:

infantry1026

Solid post.
Posted by Sentrius
Fort Rozz
Member since Jun 2011
64757 posts
Posted on 8/20/14 at 8:19 pm to
Eric Holder don't give a shite about this. He's still hard at work framing the narrative.
Posted by JT
Lake Charles
Member since Jan 2006
378 posts
Posted on 8/20/14 at 9:28 pm to
Seems logical on the surface.

But as someone who has dealt with facial fractures, I can tell you that it's not that easy to tell by simply looking or by physical exam. There's usually a lot of swelling at first. After the swelling goes down, the patient may complain of double vision, but not everyone gets that either. You need x-rays to confirm.

Also, it's not uncommon to be completely unaware of this level of injury until well after the adrenaline spike eases.

Orbital blowout fracture
Posted by LSUgusto
Member since May 2005
19311 posts
Posted on 8/20/14 at 10:16 pm to
Fair enough. I appreciate the perspective. Would an injury like that typically shut an eye from swelling? And, if so, how fast or temporary? I think that might be what causes my suspicion. Does Wilson's behavior on the street seem like a guy blind in one eye?
Posted by catholictigerfan
Member since Oct 2009
59878 posts
Posted on 8/20/14 at 10:25 pm to
quote:

Well, no matter if he was a danger, shooting him six times was unjustified"



6 times is to much, but I understand why he did it and I don't think he should be charged with anything.

1) self defense, he was attacked by brown.
2) he obviously shot him till he was down.
3) I think brown was on drugs so it makes sense it took 6 shots two head shots to take him down.

I don't think a cops initial reaction should be a gun, but there are many things to consider.

1) the cop may not know if he is armed. I have no issue with a cop shooting someone if they feel they are being threatened but don't know if he is armed or not.
2) if someone isn't armed and the cop knows that, he should use non lethal methods to contain him.
3) Use a taser if necessary, but only to stop someone who is trying to beat you up as a cop. Tasers are always overused and used to quickly.
4) don't be trigger happy, only use a gun when that is the only way to defend yourself. Again a initial reaction of using a gun is fine but if you know the person is unarmed use non lethal methods.
This post was edited on 8/20/14 at 10:27 pm
Posted by catholictigerfan
Member since Oct 2009
59878 posts
Posted on 8/20/14 at 10:30 pm to
quote:

infantry1026


great post
Posted by JT
Lake Charles
Member since Jan 2006
378 posts
Posted on 8/20/14 at 10:55 pm to
I would say this injury typically does not cause loss of vision. Double vision while looking upward maybe or maybe not.

As for swelling, there are a lot of variables. I don't think you can tell too much based on that, especially in the first several minutes.

All this being said, it's possible the cop does not actually have this injury, but I don't think you could say for sure either way what's going on just from watching the film.
Posted by infantry1026
Louisiana
Member since Jan 2010
8247 posts
Posted on 8/21/14 at 7:48 am to
quote:

I don't think a cops initial reaction should be a gun, but there are many things to consider.

1) the cop may not know if he is armed. I have no issue with a cop shooting someone if they feel they are being threatened but don't know if he is armed or not.
2) if someone isn't armed and the cop knows that, he should use non lethal methods to contain him.
3) Use a taser if necessary, but only to stop someone who is trying to beat you up as a cop. Tasers are always overused and used to quickly.
4) don't be trigger happy, only use a gun when that is the only way to defend yourself. Again a initial reaction of using a gun is fine but if you know the person is unarmed use non lethal methods.


All are very good points and I do agree. I do want to focus on number 2 though because most people fail to understand the intricacies of that mindset.

What most do not understand is that if a suspect attempts to grab your weapon.....armed or not (suspect), that is an attempt on the officer's life. They are not trying to disarm the officer to bake him a cake with the weapon.

I realize that you did touch on the officer using deadly force if he feels threatened in #1, but the statement in #2 insinuates that if a suspect is unarmed.....he should only use non-lethal.


I have heard speculation that Brown may have also had PCP in his system as well. Whether that is factual or not has not been established (to my knowledge).
BUT it would definitely fit with Brown's apparent actions. We have dealt with a significant number of individuals who dip blunts in liquid PCP, and it does cause a similar reaction.

One of my buddies was attacked in his vehicle by a suspect on the side of the interstate, the suspect also attempted to disarm my buddy. The only way he was brought down was by numerous officers arriving and deploying tasers numerous times. And really the only reason he went down is because he grew tired of fighting....because he was still fighting through the taser.

Another one of my buddies was injured on a call involving a former NFL safety high on PCP.

It is definitely becoming a major problem.
Posted by catholictigerfan
Member since Oct 2009
59878 posts
Posted on 8/21/14 at 8:01 am to
quote:

All are very good points and I do agree. I do want to focus on number 2 though because most people fail to understand the intricacies of that mindset.

What most do not understand is that if a suspect attempts to grab your weapon.....armed or not (suspect), that is an attempt on the officer's life. They are not trying to disarm the officer to bake him a cake with the weapon.

I realize that you did touch on the officer using deadly force if he feels threatened in #1, but the statement in #2 insinuates that if a suspect is unarmed.....he should only use non-lethal.


I don't think any of my points should be taken as universal, obviously there will be situations that call for lethal force even on a un-armed man.

But I think as for most situations in law enforcement, non-lethal methods should be preferred to lethal methods. If a cop feels that if he doesn't use lethal methods he could be seriously hurt or killed than yes use lethal force. I really don't fault the cop in this situation if he was badly beaten and Brown went for his weapon.
Posted by infantry1026
Louisiana
Member since Jan 2010
8247 posts
Posted on 8/21/14 at 8:09 am to
first pageprev pagePage 4 of 5Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram