re: Milwaukee election worker under investigation for ballot fraud

The enlisted are full of closet Dems..

quote:

---

You can't admit that your first inclination was to Demsplain.

---

My “first inclination” was to say “Hold on and do not assume this person committed a crime until we see some evidence to that effect.”

It is sad commentary on “your side” that you think only a Dem would see the matter that way.

quote:

---

I’ll not hold my breath for an actual apology.

---

You do this dance every time with members and instead of educating everyone around you in the difference let us peek into your consistent and habitual fallacious argumentation.

All officials in offices of government have statutory bounds that limit the scope of their power. When these individuals operate outside their scope, it creates what is called liability. Why? Because the office cannot commit crimes.

We have ignorance or I rather nescient - never having been revealed information, so no real liability here.

Negligence - failure to take proper care in the operation of a duty.

Finally we have Willful Ignorance...now here we are at your initial "reasonable" question.

Is it reasonable to expect officials to know the lawful confines of their office?
Is it reasonable to assume that "laziness" is officially not an excuse to be derelict in your duty?

All members of the community owe a duty to act as a reasonable person in undertaking or avoiding actions with the risk to harm others. If an individual fails to act as a reasonable person and their failure injures someone, they may be liable to that person for such injuries.

One of the worst things to be is a faux intellectual.

Why do you hate it when a democrat gets caught?

Are you really that stupid.......I'll answer for you YES YOU ARE.

quote:

---

Didn’t you just recently post that people should be judged based on the color of their skin?

---

Wow....

I know Hank went full retard yesterday, but wow....

quote:

---

This thread proves fAgHank is a troll.
1) He sees the hot topic "election fraud" thread.
2) Lawyer instincts tell him fraud is very difficult to prove in court.
3) quickly googles Wisconsin's voter fraud law and links it (because a monkey could do that)
4) doesn't actually realize he's completely wrong and his troll attempt holds no merit.
5) realizes his troll attempt went over like a Jimbo Fisher hire.
6) apologizes to no one in the thread because he's a POS family law attorney making money off of fear and people's lives going to shite.
Anyone hiring this idiot to shine their shoes is a moron. I'm betting not many do with all the time spent on this forum.
Guess maw and paw's farm will just have to do for this dolt.
I honestly have no idea why we continue feeding this troll.

---

Because splattering low-hanging fruit is fun....

I asked questions. (Yes, I do understand that actual inquiry is not favored by many here.)

Several posts later, I answered a related question.

quote:

---

quote:

---

Are you saying that the institution should be allowed to grant admission based on skin color?

---

Solely? Absolutely not.

One of many factors? I am a bit ambivalent. It seems unfair on its face, but at the same time I can see why an elite institution would want a diverse student body, so long as all applicants meet the admission standards.

From the perspective of a student who does not gain admission, but who is above the admission standard, is it really any worse to be denied admission due to ethnicity than to be denied admission due to the state in which one is born?

---