The_Big_Sib

If you idiots keep falling for this ludicrous narrative the powers that be will label covid 19 as an act of war justifying the national emergency and the unjust destruction of our economy and small businesses.

Therefore the criminal truth of unjust enrichment and suspension of our life, liberty, and property rights will fade into the ether, and the excuses we did what we had to do will reign on.

Hearsay evidence is not evidence.

I don't think you are living in reality or you don't have interactions with normal people.

The intelligent manipulation of the unconscious masses is starting to lose its power. This is evident with many I converse with asking questions about subjects they deemed taboo until recently.

There is a convergence of issues simultaneously aligning that is waking up Joe six pack and that is always good.

From the transpocalypse, many of us knew about this fifteen years ago, child grooming at school, medical tyranny, legacy news, uniparty politics, and finally a judiciary focused of social justice instead of American justice, all points to the pendulum swinging back away from the insane.

I'm not the least bit interested in the outcome except on this particular social level spoken of above.

The ideological war waged by the progressives who push the agenda, and protected by the conservatives who fail to revoke or stop the agenda is being revealed.

Up to Americans to actually do something with it.

When people understand that there are no solutions, only trade offs, we will again look towards the free market to create the best standards of living.

There is no area of government involvement in our personal lives that has added to our standards of living since the sixties.

Affirmative action is outright discrimination. U.S. steelworkers v weber

Welfare state was supposed to be a temporary solution but in reality as lyndon Johnson matter of factly stated, welfare is simply a voting control mechanism.

Education is the worst it has ever been and the no child left behind has truly created a standardized citizenry incapable of independent thought with newspaper brains, high school ideas, and television souls.

War on drugs is another outright failure.

War on terror... patriot act

Ndaa act
Repealing of Smith mundt act
Propaganda can be used if just one terrorist could receive the transmission.

Don't forget sovereign citizen and conspiracy theorist are domestic terrorist, however, the fbi and Cia in my opinion, created counter movements for people to fear the word citizen and the 14th amendment as bad things.

“The words ‘people of the United States’ and ‘citizens’ are synonymous terms, and mean the same thing. They are what we familiarly call the ‘sovereign people’, and every citizen is one of this people, and a constituent member of this sovereignty.” Scott vs. Sandford, 60 U.S. 393, 60 U.S. 393 (1856).

The word "citizen" as used in the Fourteenth Amendment is used in a political sense to designate one who has the rights and privileges of a citizen of a state or of the United States and does not mean the same thing as a resident, inhabitant, or person. Baldwin v Franks (1887) 120 US 678, 30 L Ed 766, 7 S Ct 656.

Knowledge will forever govern ignorance; and a people who mean to be their own governors must arm themselves with the power which knowledge gives. James Madison

“In my humble opinion, those who come to engage in debates of consequence, and who challenge accepted wisdom, should expect to be treated badly. Nonetheless, they must stand undaunted. That is required. And that should be expected. For it is bravery that is required to secure freedom.”
— Clarence Thomas

COVID-19 tyranny being exposed,
Gender queers in school indoctrinating our children,
Government involvement with tech to silence critics...
Ineptitude of all public employees isn't strictly based on race alone, but rather an inability to train...

Screw that shite, fly in "spy" balloons, and the general public eats it up!!

The freaking internet exists and every moron from here to China post everything they do online, through emails, and through text, and we the people are to believe that "spy" balloons are the existential threat to "democracy"?

Come the hell on..

Invidious discrimination means discrimination on the basis of sex, race, religion, or national origin, which is arbitrary, capricious, without reasonable foundation, or is otherwise of the general type and nature that would be unlawful discrimination if practiced in settings of public accommodation or employment.


Title 42 1985
Among the courts that have attempted to formulate working
criteria, three general approaches emerged in the period between Grif-
fin and Scott: (1) "clearly defined groups";27 (2) "immutable charac-
teristics" /"historically pervasive discrimination";28 and (3) "equal
protection" /"political association analysis."29 Of these three, only the "immutable characteristics" and "equal protection" approaches ap-
pear to have survived Scott.

Clearly identified groups have been made, and one group gets to enjoy rights, privileges, and immunity not secured by the other group.

This is how they have destroyed reality with diversity, inclusion and equity.

They wrote the laws, we simply need to use them.

Discriminatory hiring practices that use unreasonable demands are in violation of the 14th ammendment.

Almost every medical facility accepts medicaid, and if they do, they are usually liable.

Even the case law cited within these opinions are unpublished, non-citable precedent cases.
This is the same thing you find when researching Alex Jones cases, United States v. Seefried is behind a paywall on Westlaw, and is non-precedential, unpublished opinion.

It is of my opinion, that this is another show trial and I base that on the smell of it, and the subjective criteria used to get convictions.

I read the court documents cited in the article and decided to start pulling the case law the attorney used, the typical case law used in federal courts does not change much due to Stare Decisis, however, all these cases have weird opinions that shape an agenda.

178 F.3d 1288
Unpublished Disposition
NOTICE: THIS IS AN UNPUBLISHED OPINION.
(The Court's decision is referenced in a “Table of Decisions Without Reported Opinions” appearing in the Federal Reporter. See CTA4 Rule 32.1.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
Charles Randle SHIRES, Defendant-Appellee.

LINK

Even if you want to hire a lawyer, I would advise taking the class offered by Dr. Graves above.

Why? So you at least know what your attorney is supposed to be doing, what evidence actually is, versus what we think it is.

You will know when your attorney sends a fraudulent bill detailing it took them 20 hours to write a motion, you will know they are lying.

I know the course is on common law with common law causes of action and affirmative defenses, however, what you will learn is the basics of how to actually move a court, and use the rules to win.

Best money I ever spent and I can say it helped me.

To date, the FDA has assigned IND classification to each COVID-19 drug
under an EUA, namely:
a. Pfizer BioNTech COVID-19 Vaccine 19736
b. Janssen IND 22657
c. Moderna IND 19745
d. Novavax IND 22430

IRBs must comply with the following conditions:
(1) Must provide a written assurance to HHS that they will comply with the protection of human subjects regulations (45 CFR 46) and, by extension, the ethical principles of the Belmont Report.
(2) “The fundamental purpose of IRB review of informed consent is to assure that the rights and welfare of subjects are protected.” - FDA
(3) IRB review is not required for the first use of a test article administered under emergency conditions but subsequent uses do require IRB review. 21 CFR 56.104(c)
(4) Required for all expanded access protocols (Title 21 US Code Chapter 9 Subchapter V Part E) even if only one individual is involved.

The Belmont Report defines what is considered “adequate standards
of informed consent" as follows:
a. “An agreement to participate in research (e.g., participation in COVID-19 EUA drugs) constitutes valid consent only if voluntarily given. This element of informed consent requires conditions free of coercion and undue influence.”
b. “Coercion occurs when an overt threat of harm is
intentionally presented by one person to another in order to obtain compliance.”
c. “Undue influence, by contrast, occurs through an offer of an excessive, unwarranted, inappropriate or improper reward or other overture in order to obtain compliance. Also, inducements that would ordinarily be acceptable may

I will win my title 42 1985 case against the United States Marshals and the Middle District of Louisiana and will do so because of RULES.

You are using status quo arguments when nothing is status quo.

Trump wasn't status quo and neither is Biden.

Change is perpetual and as such each situation must be judged on its merits or demerits, not whether it is change or status quo.

I walk through rooms of the dead, streets of the dead, cities of the dead; men without eyes, men without voices; men with manufactured feelings and standard reactions; men with newspaper brains, television souls and high school ideas.


Your emoticon is equivalent to the response from a prepubesence school girl.

SYNTACTIC CANONS

Grammar Canon. Words are to be given the meaning that proper grammar and usage would assign
them.

Do you really believe a grammatical error performed while typing on a phone, is a legitimate excuse to not engage in intelligent dialogue?

If there is nothing else I love to do is show people how ignorant and unimaginative the leading misfits of this board are.

You sir are another board idiot!

quote:

---

What have we seen short term? An uptick of threads started here making false claims about someone's death?

---

I have seen so many of you spineless attorneys over the last 3 years that it literally makes me sick.

Your rhetoric is weak, your logic is nonsensical, and your reason perverted by your ego.

Facts and evidence are stubborn things, and to this day, attorneys, judges, and supposed medical professionals make excuses for the tyrannical overreach into personal decisions regarding individual Healthcare.

The fact that so many of you refuse to admit fault and hide behind the shadow of public health, and support an industry that tried to use duress and coercion to force compliance, without any scientific method being employed (as in every individual would need blood work taken, heart test run, and natural immunity discerned) are complicit accomplices to the conspiracy to defraud Americans of their individual liberty.

There isn't one avenue of government interference in our personal lives that accomplishes a benefit to the people.