- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Michigan 164,568 double ballots
Posted on 10/30/24 at 1:56 pm to SlowFlowPro
Posted on 10/30/24 at 1:56 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:if not, maybe they shouldn't call it voter identification.
Is the Voter ID identifying one specific voter
1
Posted on 10/30/24 at 1:56 pm to TBoy
quote:
If there is a husband and wife living at the same address, there would be two votes for that address. If there is a third person over 18 there, there would be three votes with that address. There are four registered voters at my address.
There is One Voter ID that voted 29 times from multiple addresses. What you just posted has nothing to do with the one voter ID issue.
Posted on 10/30/24 at 1:58 pm to TBoy
quote:
If there is a husband and wife living at the same address, there would be two votes for that address. If there is a third person over 18 there, there would be three votes with that address. There are four registered voters at my address.
Yeah but you each would have a different voter ID. These are all the same ID from multiple addresses.
Posted on 10/30/24 at 1:58 pm to Ex-Popcorn
quote:
I don't think so (assuming it's vote by mail). Michigan still has signature match. But, regardless of who's doing what, it is still prima facie evidence of illegal votes. Burden is on the state to explain it away.
There were other states in 2020 where signatures didn’t match, the votes were allowed.
There shouldn’t be a work around to showing ID. Either you have it or you don’t vote.
Posted on 10/30/24 at 1:59 pm to TBoy
quote:
If there is a husband and wife living at the same address, there would be two votes for that address. If there is a third person over 18 there, there would be three votes with that address. There are four registered voters at my address.
OK, but each of you has a distinct Voter ID unique to you.
This same Voter ID is listed 29 times. That is fraud. No way around it.
Posted on 10/30/24 at 1:59 pm to Ex-Popcorn
quote:
But you would have 4 Voter IDs at your address for those 4 voters. Catch up.
I see that now. Either there is some glitch in the system or this is a problem.
Either way, there will have to be an investigation into this as it suggests multiple votes assigned to a single registrant.
Posted on 10/30/24 at 2:00 pm to TBoy
quote:the question here is it's the same voters id...address is explainable
there is a husband and wife living at the same address, there would be two votes for that address. If there is a third person over 18 there, there would be three votes with that address. There are four registered voters at my address
Posted on 10/30/24 at 2:00 pm to Ex-Popcorn
quote:
But you would have 4 Voter IDs at your address for those 4 voters. Catch up
Where do these posters come from? It's like they don't have basic reading comprehension
Posted on 10/30/24 at 2:00 pm to SlowFlowPro
who cares if its a homeless center.
How has 1 voter id voted 25+ times?
How has 1 voter id voted 25+ times?
Posted on 10/30/24 at 2:01 pm to GBPackTigers
Yeah and he is the most intelligent poster on the board.
Posted on 10/30/24 at 2:02 pm to TBoy
quote:
Either way, there will have to be an investigation into this as it suggests multiple votes assigned to a single registrant.
It's way more than that. The analysis of the QVF shows 279,000 ballots cast from just 114,000 individual Voter IDs.
Posted on 10/30/24 at 2:02 pm to John Barron
1 person voted 29 times in Michigan according to Rasmussen
Posted on 10/30/24 at 2:03 pm to John Barron
The fact that they caught them is nice. They can get rid of the over votes.
Posted on 10/30/24 at 2:06 pm to SlowFlowPro
This likely no different than what Democrats have always done in terms of harvesting votes from shelters and the like. Vote by mail has just made it easier. We can argue the principle behind it, which is scummy in my view, but the legality is likely there for this activity unfortunately.
This post was edited on 10/30/24 at 2:07 pm
Posted on 10/30/24 at 2:07 pm to SportTiger1
quote:
if not, maybe they shouldn't call it voter identification.
I get that. This just seems too easy to unravel as fraud.
Theoretically possible, of course. Criminals commit easily-discovered crimes all the time.
Posted on 10/30/24 at 2:09 pm to thetempleowl
quote:
The fact that they caught them is nice. They can get rid of the over votes.
Will they?
Posted on 10/30/24 at 2:09 pm to TBoy
any guess as to which way these votes likely went? lets see how honest you can be
Posted on 10/30/24 at 2:10 pm to John Barron
Some of those are Catholic Churches and some are apartment complexes.
Posted on 10/30/24 at 2:12 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:should be.
This just seems too easy to unravel as fraud.
I just don't understand how it's procedurally possible. Louisiana forces me to vote at a specific precinct, that precinct has a list of all the names available and marks them off after I vote. If I go in later today they're going to know I already voted.
So in Michigan, how would one person vote in a) more than one precinct and B) multiple times at the same precinct in one day?
I hope this is just some error, but it seems like elementary level security procedures
Posted on 10/30/24 at 2:14 pm to SportTiger1
quote:
just don't understand how it's procedurally possible.
It’s not a bug, it’s a feature.
Page 4 of 7
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News