- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
1
Posted on 2/2/18 at 11:16 am to Jjdoc
So muh Russia is really:
Muh DNC
Muh Obama
Muh Dossier
Muh cheating Hillary
Muh illegal FISA
Muh DNC
Muh Obama
Muh Dossier
Muh cheating Hillary
Muh illegal FISA
Posted on 2/2/18 at 11:16 am to buckeye_vol
quote:
I don't really get this. Obviously they didn't get what they paid for, but they were probably paying for legitimate information that they could use, so the legitimacy issue should be a major criticism, but why would someone paying for the information have any bearing on that?
I guess 2 things:
First-bias, to say the least. If your enemy is paying for research on you, well, that's questionable in itself.
Second-they got their information from & by paying RUSSIA!!!! GEEZ!!! It's collusion right there!! with a foreign gov't!!! And Russia, no less!!!!
Posted on 2/2/18 at 11:16 am to TDsngumbo
quote:Wow what a POS
Chad Pergram on Twitter: "McCain: The latest attacks on the FBI and Department of Justice serve no American interests – no party’s, no president’s, only Putin’s. If we continue to undermine our own rule of law, we are doing Putin’s job for him."
LINK
Posted on 2/2/18 at 11:17 am to cajunangelle
quote:
Wow what a POS
he goes down too
Posted on 2/2/18 at 11:17 am to ShortyRob
quote:I guess I'm just saying it's the message that's important, not the messenger. It seems like the message was bad so that should be the focus, in my opinion. In fact, I find that more disturbing because that would mean regardless of the messenger, the message isn't thoroughly vetted by anyone in this process. Of course, that's not as exciting from a partisan standpoint, but I think it's more important and highlights Rand's and Amash's criticisms of the entire process.
Well. I mean. If you let the court believe that an independent agency acquired information when in fact, it was "acquired" by opponents of the person you want a warrant on................
Come the frick on man. Have some self-respect
Posted on 2/2/18 at 11:17 am to 50_Tiger
Per DU:
quote:
We just lost all of our allies
None of our allies will ever share any intelligence with the US ever again.
What kind of a fricking a-hole is in the White House now, anyway?
Posted on 2/2/18 at 11:18 am to buckeye_vol
quote:
I just don't get the part about who paid for it.
that shows extreme prejudice/bias
just think about the more general scenario. your "team" pays a 3rd party to do biased opposition research against your team's political opponent. you then use this biased documentation that you, in effect, created, to sway a judge to grant a warrant
you think the judge shouldn't know how the document originated? imagine what police could do against anyone under this scenario
Posted on 2/2/18 at 11:18 am to CptBengal
quote:
Media, Obozo, Hillary, DOJ, FBI...all go down.
EVERYONE GOES DOWN.
I wish.
Posted on 2/2/18 at 11:18 am to TX Tiger
Posted on 2/2/18 at 11:19 am to cajunangelle
quote:
Chad Pergram on Twitter: "McCain: The latest attacks on the FBI and Department of Justice serve no American interests – no party’s, no president’s, only Putin’s. If we continue to undermine our own rule of law, we are doing Putin’s job for him."
LINK
Remember the piece of shite John McCain pushed this dossier to give it some sense of bipartisanship credibility.
John McCain is a treasonous low life.
Posted on 2/2/18 at 11:19 am to CptBengal
quote:I said this:
based on what you fricking imbecile?
seriously.
quote:I'm saying the research in the dossier seems to be poor work. So if that makes me an imbecile, then I guess you're saying the dossier was well-researched and therefore much more valid?
Since the dossier seems to be poorly researched,
Posted on 2/2/18 at 11:19 am to Walkthedawg
All I want is a pdf of the memo and nudes of Lisa Boothe.
Posted on 2/2/18 at 11:20 am to cajunangelle
quote:
McCain
There was just a thread this morning about how he's been quiet lately and how refreshing that was.
frick McCain and all that noise. Releasing the memo isn't doing Putin's job. All these corrupt MF'ers breaking the law are aiding Putin.
Posted on 2/2/18 at 11:20 am to cajunangelle
Mueller – Republican, appointed by Rosenstein.
Rosenstein – Republican, appointed by Trump.
Sessions – Republican, appointed by Trump.
Wray – Republican, appointed by Trump.
But yeah...they are all helping the democrats.
Rosenstein – Republican, appointed by Trump.
Sessions – Republican, appointed by Trump.
Wray – Republican, appointed by Trump.
But yeah...they are all helping the democrats.
Posted on 2/2/18 at 11:20 am to Jjdoc
Posted on 2/2/18 at 11:20 am to indianswim
Memo has been released by the HIC!!!
Find it and link it dammit.....
Looks like it was sent to media outlets and will be released on the HIC website shortly
Find it and link it dammit.....
Looks like it was sent to media outlets and will be released on the HIC website shortly
This post was edited on 2/2/18 at 11:22 am
Posted on 2/2/18 at 11:21 am to a want
quote:
You guys are going to get burned. I tried to tell you.
Dude, swim out of that river you call Denial! Wrong is wrong and any patriotic AMERICAN should care.
Posted on 2/2/18 at 11:21 am to buckeye_vol
quote:
I'm just generally curious how the source necessarily means anything as opposed to the information itself and the legality of its collection.
It means that the FBI was put to use by the Democratic Party to spy on Donald Trump in an attempt to influence a presidential election.
MAGA
Posted on 2/2/18 at 11:21 am to buckeye_vol
quote:
I guess I'm just saying it's the message that's important, not the messenger.
eh, with these burdens, it's a combination of both
LEO is give the benefit of the doubt due to their status, which is why they typically have to swear to the authenticity of the information in the warrant. if they didn't personally acquire evidence listed, they have duties to disclose the source or they risk a likely successful attack of the warrant down the road
Page 6 of 22
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News