- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Matt Walsh debunks Charlie Kirk conspiracy theories...
Posted on 12/12/25 at 8:37 pm to hawgfaninc
Posted on 12/12/25 at 8:37 pm to hawgfaninc
Yes because Candace is doing major damage to the right. Moronic rubes who watch Owens actually believes that TPUSA had something to do with Charlies death. Its insane. I gave Candace the benefit of doubt in the beginning, but then she started accusing almost everyone in Charlies orbit of being in on it. Owens is nothing more than a scorned woman because Kirk chose a white supermodel over her.
1
Posted on 12/12/25 at 8:38 pm to RollTide1987
I don’t believe anything the FBI says. They might be correct in their conclusions, but I don’t have any trust in them to tell the truth ever.
Posted on 12/12/25 at 8:40 pm to Neutral Underground
quote:
Yes because Candace is doing major damage to the right.
Whatever credibility the FBI had left has been destroyed the last few years. They targeted a sitting president and repeatedly lied about it to the American people.
Posted on 12/12/25 at 8:42 pm to m2pro
I don't follow candace owens but she is practically ripping MAGA apart
I have been following this story since day one and as much as people don't want to believe shite.. I trust Dan Bongino that this dude killed Charlie Kirk
And I also believe that this dude was not trying to aim for his neck which made it look like he was a professional shooter.. the bullet just hit him in that spot by accident. He was probably aiming either for his head or chest and him not being a professional target shooter just happened to get lucky and hit him in the neck
For fricks sake... Candace Owens was telling her fricking audience that someone underground shot Charlie Kirk.. let that sink in before believing a single fricking word that comes out of her mouth
I have been following this story since day one and as much as people don't want to believe shite.. I trust Dan Bongino that this dude killed Charlie Kirk
And I also believe that this dude was not trying to aim for his neck which made it look like he was a professional shooter.. the bullet just hit him in that spot by accident. He was probably aiming either for his head or chest and him not being a professional target shooter just happened to get lucky and hit him in the neck
For fricks sake... Candace Owens was telling her fricking audience that someone underground shot Charlie Kirk.. let that sink in before believing a single fricking word that comes out of her mouth
This post was edited on 12/12/25 at 8:46 pm
Posted on 12/12/25 at 8:43 pm to kajunman
quote:
In more than a friend kind of way.
Right. I certainly understood the implication, and I don't find that outside of the realm of possibility. Whether or not she loved him as a lover, or if it truly is platonic... either way, it is unmistakable in its sincerity.
Posted on 12/12/25 at 8:44 pm to Sofaking2
That's a fair assessment. However, I believe the FBI's narrative over the conspiracy theorist's narratives - mainly because you'd have to believe these guys were the dumbest MF'ers who ever lived. Why?
1. Why have Charlie Kirk offed in public? Why not make it look like an accident or a suicide in his own home?
2. Why allow the patsy to live? Why not turn it into a murder-suicide?
3. Why allow the patsy's parents - who turned the patsy in - to be involved in the conspiracy at all? At the very least, have them disappear or die under the mysterious circumstances.
4. Why use the wrong ammunition? You'd think that these men who are experts in pulling off stunts like these would know what would or would not fool sleuths on the internet.
1. Why have Charlie Kirk offed in public? Why not make it look like an accident or a suicide in his own home?
2. Why allow the patsy to live? Why not turn it into a murder-suicide?
3. Why allow the patsy's parents - who turned the patsy in - to be involved in the conspiracy at all? At the very least, have them disappear or die under the mysterious circumstances.
4. Why use the wrong ammunition? You'd think that these men who are experts in pulling off stunts like these would know what would or would not fool sleuths on the internet.
Posted on 12/12/25 at 8:48 pm to FLTech
quote:
I don't follow candace owens but she is practically ripping MAGA apart
this is msm narrative. And it is a lie. What is hurting MAGA is Trump. I am still not regretful i voted for him a third time, but there are some legitimate objective realities of his second term that we ALL need to own.
quote:
I have been following this story since day one and as much as people do t want to believe shite.. I trust Dan Bongino that this dude killed Charlie Kirk
I have told my wife on numerous occasions how Bongino I still trust in his heart. But, his actions prove to me he is either threatened or paid off, or both. He has proven to be not who I EVER thought he would be. I know I am just little ole me, and I don't know what he knows and what game he is really in. I hate that he decided to join this cabinet SO much. I think he was better for us doing what he was doing prior to election day.
Deep down I still trust Dan. I just dont trust him anymore while in this cabinet the same way.
Posted on 12/12/25 at 8:58 pm to RollTide1987
Kirk conspiracy theories are so fricking stupid that I am convinced the “bunkers” and “debunkers” are in kahoots to drive clicks.
Posted on 12/12/25 at 9:07 pm to m2pro
You don't trust him because he does not do a press conference every single day explaining to you exactly step by step what they are working on... there's a few things some of you people need to realize... Not just about this case but all cases
#1) - Fair Trials
You know for a fact that we are not going to get a fair trial. There are too many commies working in the justice system to ever have a fair trial and if they say one tiny little thing wrong in an interview, on Youtube, on a podcast, on Fox News, on X, etc - they will use it against them.
#2) Power -
If and when Democrats ever regain power, they will be going straight after Pam Bondi. Kash Patel, Dan Bongino, Pete Hegseth, etc etc etc. They all really have to cover their assholes up with what they are doing now because in a few years down the road, their words now can land them in prison
#3) MAGA Influencers -
These guys (there are hundreds of them) will take anything they hear and turn it into exactly what we are seeing right now with Candace Owens
You people just don't think that hey are doing a good job because they aren't being transparent like Trump is and it is all by design. In fact, it's amazing what they have been able to do because there have not been any leaks about anything. They are keeping EVRYTHING airtight.
#1) - Fair Trials
You know for a fact that we are not going to get a fair trial. There are too many commies working in the justice system to ever have a fair trial and if they say one tiny little thing wrong in an interview, on Youtube, on a podcast, on Fox News, on X, etc - they will use it against them.
#2) Power -
If and when Democrats ever regain power, they will be going straight after Pam Bondi. Kash Patel, Dan Bongino, Pete Hegseth, etc etc etc. They all really have to cover their assholes up with what they are doing now because in a few years down the road, their words now can land them in prison
#3) MAGA Influencers -
These guys (there are hundreds of them) will take anything they hear and turn it into exactly what we are seeing right now with Candace Owens
You people just don't think that hey are doing a good job because they aren't being transparent like Trump is and it is all by design. In fact, it's amazing what they have been able to do because there have not been any leaks about anything. They are keeping EVRYTHING airtight.
Posted on 12/12/25 at 9:39 pm to m2pro
quote:
and developed as she got sent information and learned to sniff out the bs.
She was sent on a wild goose chase to her own lawyer's office.
Posted on 12/12/25 at 9:42 pm to m2pro
quote:
She is getting way too close for their comfort, and they know she is never EVER going away.
You’re an actual retard
Posted on 12/12/25 at 9:56 pm to Proximo
quote:
You’re an actual retard
There have been two recurring and consistent themes with folks like you.
Insults, and then admission they haven't seen her videos and coverage starting right after Charlie was murdered.
Posted on 12/12/25 at 11:18 pm to m2pro
quote:
That was not a 30-06's likely ballistics
Tyler did not likely pull the trigger (and was not the killer)
Tyler was involved
He did not act alone
You will see these will be true, even if they can pull the wool over many people's eyes (like JFK) for decades.
In the end, you will see this will hold to be true.
Sure, dude.
The fact that we will all be dead before the truth comes out proves the conspiracy, right?
Posted on 12/12/25 at 11:19 pm to m2pro
quote:
Insults
I don't think that was an insult.
I think it was a diagnosis.
Posted on 12/12/25 at 11:25 pm to Sofaking2
quote:
I don’t believe anything the FBI says.
That's not being "skeptical." That's being cynical.
Skepticism remains neutral about the conclusion until all avenues have been investigated and all evidence is known. Cynicism starts with a conclusion and reverse engineers the evidence to fit it.
Skepticism challenges observed holes in a narrative. Cynicism makes up holes in a narrative where none exist.
Skepticism can be useful in determining the truth. Cynicism buries the truth under bias. It is usually hostile to the truth and has no interest in finding it, only proving the conclusion.
You've already admitted with the quoted statement above, you are not skeptical, you're cynical.
Therefore, I recommend you sitting this one out.
Posted on 12/13/25 at 12:00 am to tigerclicks
quote:
He said nothing for 30 minutes.
That’s what I thought too. Walsh is usually pretty good. This was lame and felt very fabricated
This post was edited on 12/13/25 at 12:00 am
Posted on 12/13/25 at 12:55 am to ZeroChill
Why do the right always like a moth to a flame turn shite into some conspiracy theory crap?
This type of crap saps the energy of the right and drives away a huge number of people.
The left have big time issues and we spend so much time and energy on something as dumb as what this now multi page thread has turned into.
This type of crap saps the energy of the right and drives away a huge number of people.
The left have big time issues and we spend so much time and energy on something as dumb as what this now multi page thread has turned into.
Posted on 12/13/25 at 2:04 am to David_DJS
Baron Coleman-Electrocution?
There are a lot of things out there that look suspicious. If anyone can watch this objectively, they will see it or at least be more open minded afterwards. Just watch who publicly attempts to debunk while claiming this guy is after clicks and making $$ on his execution. When Candace chimes in, Nick will be the first.
There are a lot of things out there that look suspicious. If anyone can watch this objectively, they will see it or at least be more open minded afterwards. Just watch who publicly attempts to debunk while claiming this guy is after clicks and making $$ on his execution. When Candace chimes in, Nick will be the first.
Posted on 12/13/25 at 2:13 am to RollTide1987
His is towing the company line. There is no examination of the lack of evidence that we all want to see. As far as anyone attacking Ericka Kirk, that is beyond sick.
Posted on 12/13/25 at 7:31 am to m2pro
quote:
m2pro
She isn't going to bang you.
Page 4 of 5
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News