- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Massive increase in cancer deaths in UK last year; probably climate change
Posted on 11/23/23 at 5:03 am
Posted on 11/23/23 at 5:03 am
quote:
The study’s results in the rate of cancer deaths above the historic norm in 2022 for ages 15-44 in the U.K. included:
A 28% rise in fatal breast cancer rates in women.
An 80% increase in pancreatic cancer deaths among women and a 60% increase among men.
A 55% increase among men in colon cancer deaths and a 41% increase in women.
A 120% increase in fatal melanomas among men and a 35% increase in women.
A 35% increase in brain cancer deaths among men and a 12% rise in women.
A 60% increase in cancer death rates among men in cancers “without site specification” and a 55% increase among women.
LINK
And if you want to attack the source:
quote:
Dowd produced his report, assembled by Carlos Alegria, one of Dowd’s partners, in his Humanity Projects study of excess deaths in the U.K. and the U.S. using government and insurance industry data.
He said he started his pro bono data-driven project to help guide public policy when he saw how COVID-19 pandemic policies were destroying society’s faith in institutional experts.
quote:
We focus our research on younger individuals, aged 15-44, as presently it is a topic of particular interest due to the rise in anecdotal evidence of many unexplained aggressive and unusual cancers (such as turbo cancers … ) occurring in the population, particularly in younger individuals,” he wrote in the study.
“The focus of this study is not to examine individual claims and anecdotes, but instead to provide a statistical analysis at a population level and clarify if the anecdotal evidence is abnormal or not.”
27
Posted on 11/23/23 at 5:40 am to ksayetiger
F cancer.
Posted on 11/23/23 at 5:53 am to ksayetiger
Safe
AND
Effective
AND
Effective
Posted on 11/23/23 at 6:01 am to ksayetiger
The premise being that the shot impairs the immune system and that the latent cancers your body is always fighting breakthrough and kill you. Isn’t this what that clinician in Idaho had been saying since the beginning?
Posted on 11/23/23 at 6:03 am to ksayetiger
This has nothing to do with that injectable millions had to either take or lose their job. The government told us it was safe.
Posted on 11/23/23 at 9:01 am to ksayetiger
Any study that doesn't look at the covid shots roll, is worthless. Rule it out, don't just dismiss it from the start.
On a positive note, apparently a company has created a test to find pancreatic cancer. As it's one of the most silent killer due to hard to detect early sign versions, it's a positive one to have a test for. Hope it turns out to be a great test.
On a positive note, apparently a company has created a test to find pancreatic cancer. As it's one of the most silent killer due to hard to detect early sign versions, it's a positive one to have a test for. Hope it turns out to be a great test.
quote:
An 80% increase in pancreatic cancer deaths among women and a 60% increase among men.
Posted on 11/23/23 at 9:08 am to AtlantaLSUfan
quote:
government told us it was safe.
Even though prizer told those same governments they weren’t sure. Hmmmm….
Posted on 11/23/23 at 9:10 am to ksayetiger
It is due to the lack of air conditioning.
Posted on 11/23/23 at 9:11 am to ksayetiger
Tons of young people getting cancer happens all the time or something.
Posted on 11/23/23 at 9:17 am to ksayetiger
Anecdotally, my daughter has had three high school classmates get cancer diagnoses in the last year. School of around 750 students.
Posted on 11/23/23 at 9:53 am to ksayetiger
Social medicine and the failing NHS. The UK has always had the worst cancer survival rates of most advanced economies.
They have they least equipped hospitals, and extremely long wait times.
8+ million people are on a wait-list in a country of 67 million people. 12% of people or 1 out of every 8 citizens is waiting on treatment or a surgery.
90+ min average ambulance response times for heart attack and stroke victims.
Cheap healthcare isn't good healthcare.
They have they least equipped hospitals, and extremely long wait times.
8+ million people are on a wait-list in a country of 67 million people. 12% of people or 1 out of every 8 citizens is waiting on treatment or a surgery.
90+ min average ambulance response times for heart attack and stroke victims.
Cheap healthcare isn't good healthcare.
Posted on 11/23/23 at 11:20 am to ksayetiger
My initial reaction is that this is a result of the shutdown of the health care system during the pandemic and/or delays to care.
Posted on 11/23/23 at 11:26 am to ksayetiger
Dr Robert Malone cites Dowd's work on occasion, Malone believes Dowd's data is a good source to prove the damage done by the MRNA Juice.
Posted on 11/23/23 at 11:26 am to ksayetiger
I was thinking the surge in White Supremacy was the cause.
Posted on 11/23/23 at 12:19 pm to Prole Drift
quote:
My initial reaction is that this is a result of the shutdown of the health care system during the pandemic and/or delays to care.
Wouldn't a 5% decline in reported cancer deaths -v- the baseline period due to healthcare shutdown/delay in 2020 yield a similar increase over the baseline on the other side of the shutdown/delay?
A (roughly) 30% increase in cancer deaths over the ensuing two year period dwarfs a 5% decline for one year of healthcare system shutdown/delays.
Posted on 11/23/23 at 12:21 pm to Aubie Spr96
Thoughts and prayers to MRNA enthusiasts Jake88 and SloFlowPro.
Posted on 11/23/23 at 1:20 pm to David_DJS
quote:
Wouldn't a 5% decline in reported cancer deaths -v- the baseline period due to healthcare shutdown/delay in 2020 yield a similar increase over the baseline on the other side of the shutdown/delay?
Good question. However, it's my understanding that surgeries were suspended for quite some time. Thus, someone diagnosed with colon cancer may have had to wait months for the resection. Can't be good for the survival stats. Meaning, deaths may be occurring that wouldn't normally have taken place.
Posted on 11/23/23 at 1:26 pm to Prole Drift
quote:
Good question. However, it's my understanding that surgeries were suspended for quite some time. Thus, someone diagnosed with colon cancer may have had to wait months for the resection. Can't be good for the survival stats. Meaning, deaths may be occurring that wouldn't normally have taken place.
Then there should have been a more pronounced decline in 2020 and perhaps it should have extended into 2021 and 2022, which would mean the spike caused by the vaxx (or whatever you want to attribute it to) is even greater because it's being muted in the data by lingering shutdown/delay effects. In that case it would, for example/perhaps - 10% decline over a two year period caused by shutdown/delays in healthcare versus an ensuing 40% spike in cancer deaths.
Posted on 11/23/23 at 1:29 pm to CDawson
quote:
I was thinking the surge in White Supremacy was the cause.
The silent killer we have been warned about.
Page 1 of 3
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News