- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Massie the only republican to vote against the SAVE Act
Posted on 2/11/26 at 12:43 pm to Jake88
Posted on 2/11/26 at 12:43 pm to Jake88
quote:
Sometimes those principles screw us. Once in awhile we need to fight fire with fire.
My point stands.
Doesn't that make those "fighting fire with fire" the RINOs?
Posted on 2/11/26 at 12:44 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
if there is no set of principles to define a "Republican", how can anyone either be a Republican or RINO? How do you distinguish between the 2 labels?
All the OP did was use the RINO label out of frustration over Massie's vote on this measure. It's not that complicated.
Posted on 2/11/26 at 12:44 pm to hawgfaninc
Thought that idiot Collins was going to vote against it? Did she see the polls and change her values???
Posted on 2/11/26 at 12:45 pm to GumboPot
quote:
All the OP did was use the RINO label out of frustration over Massie's vote on this measure. It's not that complicated.
So the 215 are the real RINOs?
Posted on 2/11/26 at 12:45 pm to Tridentds
quote:
Thought that idiot Collins was going to vote against it?
She's a Senator, bubba
Posted on 2/11/26 at 12:45 pm to Tridentds
quote:
Thought that idiot Collins was going to vote against it?
Collins is in the Senate, not the House. (Unless you are thinking of another Collins in the House I'm not familiar with).
Posted on 2/11/26 at 12:46 pm to hawgfaninc
He voted against the procedural rule advancing it because it included language that would block or delay congressional votes on repealing Trump's emergency tariffs (which he doesn't have the Constitutional authority to implement).
ETA: He would have voted for the SAVE Act alone...
ETA: He would have voted for the SAVE Act alone...
Loading Twitter/X Embed...
If tweet fails to load, click here.This post was edited on 2/11/26 at 1:11 pm
Posted on 2/11/26 at 12:46 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
So the 215 are the real RINOs?
You are welcome to use whatever labels you want and need to get that cathartic release.
Posted on 2/11/26 at 12:47 pm to GumboPot
quote:
You are welcome to use whatever labels you want and need to get that cathartic release.
I don't use silly nonsense labels like RINO
Posted on 2/11/26 at 12:47 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
How does this not apply to the 215 who just voted against Republican principles (states rights)?
This is an incredibly small minded thought process to this.
So let me ask you, is every single federal action "against states rights"?
This didn't erode states rights, no moreso than federal government erodes states rights when we are taxed.
You, personally, do you believe a state should allow illegals to vote in federal elections?
Posted on 2/11/26 at 12:48 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:because the fed gov has to deal with rogue states refusing to implement their own laws, but you know this, you disengenuous frick
How does this not apply to the 215 who just voted against Republican principles (states rights)?
Posted on 2/11/26 at 12:49 pm to hawgfaninc
TDS claims another one.


Posted on 2/11/26 at 12:49 pm to BugAC
quote:
So let me ask you, is every single federal action "against states rights"?
No. This is a particular area where states exert dominion.
quote:
This didn't erode states rights, no moreso than federal government erodes states rights when we are taxed.
What?
Taxing the governments?
quote:
You, personally, do you believe a state should allow illegals to vote in federal elections?
That's already illegal.
Posted on 2/11/26 at 12:50 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
I don't use silly nonsense labels like RINO
I should follow this standard but I'm guilty of it.
Posted on 2/11/26 at 12:50 pm to hawgfaninc
I don’t know why you need more proof that Massey is a democrat. He knows that people who vote without ID help Democrats win elections.
Posted on 2/11/26 at 12:50 pm to ninthward
quote:
because the fed gov has to deal with rogue states refusing to implement their own laws,
You're just giving reasons on why being a RINO is Ok. It's not responding to my question directly.
If you want to justify why being a RINO/hypocrite is OK, that's fine, but it simply doesn't address my question.
Posted on 2/11/26 at 12:51 pm to GumboPot
quote:
I should follow this standard but I'm guilty of it.
At this point it's in the pantheon of nonsense words like racism, lawfare, globalism/st, etc.
Posted on 2/11/26 at 12:51 pm to SlowFlowPro
SlowEverythingisirrelvantexceptmyopinionPro putting in work!
Posted on 2/11/26 at 12:54 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
What?
Taxing the governments?
Are federal taxes an erosion of states rights? Meaning, should fedgov be allowed to tax a state, if a state decides it's people will not be subject to fed taxes?
quote:
That's already illegal.
and yet, it happens. Because liberal states provide no oversight to their elections for 1 specific reason. To defraud state and federal elections.
So, again, i ask you, do you personally believe a state should allow illegals to vote in federal elections? And try not to avoid providing an answer this time.
Popular
Back to top



1





