- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Massie the only republican to vote against the SAVE Act
Posted on 2/12/26 at 1:28 pm to 3down10
Posted on 2/12/26 at 1:28 pm to 3down10
quote:
If you do not support and defend the constitution, then you are a domestic enemy to society.
Lolzy.
Did you win like a junior debate tournament somewhere and you thought that you had some kind of philosophical prowess on that basis?
You’re spewing your version of truisms as if you know what they mean.
Posted on 2/12/26 at 1:29 pm to 3down10
quote:
I don't care what you and your brother do.
This was a pretty chill dialogue until you realized my points were sound. It sucks when this is the route taken.
Posted on 2/12/26 at 1:32 pm to the808bass
quote:
This is a weak basis for prohibiting incest. If you were logically consistent, you would then extend genetic testing to other potential issues That might arise from two people procreating and restrict marriage licenses on that basis.
It's been the basis against incest for thousands of years.
Are you saying a person who is against incest must also be in favor of Eugenics?
Are you capable of making arguments that aren't based on a logical fallacy? I mean especially since you are claiming "logical consistency", you should at least not base your entire argument on a slippery slope fallacy.
This post was edited on 2/12/26 at 1:34 pm
Posted on 2/12/26 at 1:35 pm to 3down10
quote:
It's been the basis against incest for thousands of years.
No, it hasn’t. You think Mandel’s theory of genetics was driving the bus all these years?
Posted on 2/12/26 at 1:36 pm to GRTiger
quote:
This was a pretty chill dialogue until you realized my points were sound. It sucks when this is the route taken.
You won't even address what I say in full and keep taking small parts out of it trying to come up with a gotcha.
So cry more.
Posted on 2/12/26 at 1:36 pm to 3down10
quote:
Are you capable of making arguments that aren't based on a logical fallacy?
Lol. You wouldn’t know a logical fallacy if its dick slapped you in the face.
Posted on 2/12/26 at 1:39 pm to the808bass
quote:
No, it hasn’t. You think Mandel’s theory of genetics was driving the bus all these years?
Try reading a bible.
Posted on 2/12/26 at 1:40 pm to the808bass
quote:
Lol. You wouldn’t know a logical fallacy if its dick slapped you in the face.
Says the guy who keeps calling slippery slope fallacies "logically consistent"
This post was edited on 2/12/26 at 1:42 pm
Posted on 2/12/26 at 1:40 pm to 3down10
So it wasn’t genetic. It was morality based. Now we’re back to you arguing with yourself again.
Posted on 2/12/26 at 1:40 pm to the808bass
I don't have time to read through all the pages but am curious - did SloBro ever explain how it's within fedgov's authority to strike down a state's law requiring proof of citizenship to vote but it's not within fedgov's authority to compel states to require proof of citizenship to vote?
Posted on 2/12/26 at 1:41 pm to 3down10
quote:
Says the guy who keeps calling slippery slope fallacies "logical consistent"
Horry sheet.
You’re cute.
Posted on 2/12/26 at 1:41 pm to David_DJS
I assume your question is rhetorical.
Posted on 2/12/26 at 1:42 pm to the808bass
Abortion, murdering babies, is not a "social issue." It's a criminal issue.
If adults want purple hair and want to chop their dicks off and be tranny freaks, that's a social issue for them.
If schools and churches want to have them speak in front of children, that's a criminal issue.
If freaks want to force tranny shite and other deviance onto children, that's a criminal issue.
What else?
A grown man in the bathroom with a little girl is a criminal issue.
Stop letting the left dictate to you what you consider "social issues"
If adults want purple hair and want to chop their dicks off and be tranny freaks, that's a social issue for them.
If schools and churches want to have them speak in front of children, that's a criminal issue.
If freaks want to force tranny shite and other deviance onto children, that's a criminal issue.
What else?
A grown man in the bathroom with a little girl is a criminal issue.
Stop letting the left dictate to you what you consider "social issues"
Posted on 2/12/26 at 1:43 pm to Harry Rex Vonner
Interesting.
I’m not sure what that has to do with what I posted.
I’m not sure what that has to do with what I posted.
Posted on 2/12/26 at 1:45 pm to Harry Rex Vonner
Really. I know you don’t agree with my statement. Nothing in your post was a refutation of it.
Lower muh taxes. Imma consuhvative!
Lower muh taxes. Imma consuhvative!
Posted on 2/12/26 at 1:52 pm to the808bass
quote:
So it wasn’t genetic. It was morality based. Now we’re back to you arguing with yourself again.
It came from seeing and understanding the consequences of the actions, aka genetic.
Posted on 2/12/26 at 1:57 pm to the808bass
quote:
Lolzy.
Did you win like a junior debate tournament somewhere and you thought that you had some kind of philosophical prowess on that basis?
You’re spewing your version of truisms as if you know what they mean.
That is the oath people take when they sign up for the military.
I, _____, do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will support and defend the Constitution of the United States against all enemies, foreign and domestic; that I will bear true faith and allegiance to the same; and that I will obey the orders of the President of the United States and the orders of the officers appointed over me, according to regulations and the Uniform Code of Military Justice. So help me God
Posted on 2/12/26 at 1:59 pm to 3down10
Good. Me having a different idea of what Conservatism is (and also a correct idea) doesn’t make me an enemy of the country. You’re so far over your skis, you don’t know if you’re taking off or landing.
Posted on 2/12/26 at 1:59 pm to 3down10
It’s wild how far off topic a thread can go.
The lie of the OP is buried at this point.
The lie of the OP is buried at this point.
Popular
Back to top



2




