- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Massie prohibiting involvement
Posted on 6/16/25 at 9:04 pm to momentoftruth87
Posted on 6/16/25 at 9:04 pm to momentoftruth87
No US servicemen have been sent to Ukraine to fight. Pretty amazing the results were getting given that fact, right?
4
Posted on 6/16/25 at 9:05 pm to RogerTheShrubber
Nothing will happen Roger. No boots on the ground. Everyone panics Massie didn’t do shite under Biden but now against Drumpf. Straight up TDS and jealousy.
Posted on 6/16/25 at 9:06 pm to boosiebadazz
And nobody has been activated for this. There was tons of money and weapons sent that wasn’t. Other wars weren’t voted on by Congress. This is different tho to Boosie
Posted on 6/16/25 at 9:06 pm to momentoftruth87
quote:
“But he only represents his constituents”, my arse.
Sorry that you struggle with such basic Constitutional concepts.
Posted on 6/16/25 at 9:07 pm to momentoftruth87
quote:
Other wars weren’t voted on by Congress. This is different tho to Boosie
Yes, because Congress foolishly ceded that power under certain circumstances. If Massie can pull the politics to take it back, good on him. That’s the way the system is designed.
Posted on 6/16/25 at 9:07 pm to IvoryBillMatt
K, Altie. Remember this morning when you swore you were right and proven wrong by noon?
Posted on 6/16/25 at 9:08 pm to momentoftruth87
quote:BASED AF
Massie prohibiting involvement
Posted on 6/16/25 at 9:10 pm to momentoftruth87
Massie has a stronger backbone and larger set of nuts than TACO
Posted on 6/16/25 at 9:11 pm to boosiebadazz
quote:
No US servicemen have been sent to Ukraine to fight.
That is plainly false. There are hundreds of US servicemen there. We are getting around that by calling them contractors.
They are to the military what the NGOs are to USAID - a fig leaf.
This post was edited on 6/16/25 at 9:12 pm
Posted on 6/16/25 at 9:12 pm to Penrod
bullshite.
Posted on 6/16/25 at 9:13 pm to momentoftruth87
quote:
K, Altie. Remember this morning when you swore you were right and proven wrong by noon?
About what??? People let you get away with too much lying. Just like your cowardice in not admitting that you linked the wrong YouTube video, you won't be able to find anything I swore to and was wrong. Prove me wrong.
Posted on 6/16/25 at 9:21 pm to momentoftruth87
quote:
He’s writing a bill right now.
Posted on 6/16/25 at 9:22 pm to Jbird
Shitbull!
Posted on 6/16/25 at 9:24 pm to Penrod
There aren't any military personnel assigned to that area. There are plenty of contractors. Even in places like Poland working things like F-16 aircraft.
Posted on 6/16/25 at 9:45 pm to momentoftruth87
I’m not a fan of many of the posters opposing you in this thread, but I have to agree with the main point: I don’t want to be involved in another war—regardless of who said what or which side of the aisle supports it.
Posted on 6/17/25 at 5:54 am to Jbird
quote:
There aren't any military personnel assigned to that area. There are plenty of contractors.
Agreed. That’s what I wrote in my post.
Posted on 6/17/25 at 6:10 am to boosiebadazz
quote:
No US servicemen have been sent to Ukraine to fight.
Depends on your definition of the word “fight”. US servicemen have been in theater for quite awhile …. and if you think that Victoria Nuland’s fingerprints aren’t all over the Ukraine war, you’re simply being willfully ignorant.
Posted on 6/17/25 at 6:12 am to Klark Kent
quote:
I don’t want to be involved in another war—regardless of who said what or which side of the aisle supports it.
No sensible person does, but Iran cannot have a nuclear weapon. They are promoters and funders of terrorism.
Posted on 6/17/25 at 6:15 am to momentoftruth87
A base or ship is going to be hit, then everyone will cry about the unprovoked attack on Americans.
Posted on 6/17/25 at 6:15 am to momentoftruth87
He's one guy, this isn't the Senate where you can use Parliamentary rules in a manner where 1or 2 people can gum things up
Page 2 of 4
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News