- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Massie: Epstein files’ release on Friday will show whether Bondi, Kash Patel were lying
Posted on 12/19/25 at 5:24 am to Jyrdis
Posted on 12/19/25 at 5:24 am to Jyrdis
He's up for re-election and being primaried.
This is all fundraising masquerading as work.
those are the only relevant facts. Not that he's ready "for the MAGA onslought" when the Epstein files are released, not if Bondi or Patel are lying about Epstein (never mind anything else).
This is fundraising.
This is all fundraising masquerading as work.
those are the only relevant facts. Not that he's ready "for the MAGA onslought" when the Epstein files are released, not if Bondi or Patel are lying about Epstein (never mind anything else).
This is fundraising.
0
Posted on 12/19/25 at 7:22 am to RelicBatches86
Massie is overly dramatic. The DOJ already said GM provided 100 names to them. So Massie gunning for Patel and Bondi is strange. If the 100 names are released-would it affect world affairs?
I can save the suspense. If you go to X and search 20 names and their various professions, you will see Massie drop the names in varied responses one at a time.
He is livid with Miriam Adelson for funding against him. She may want the former PM of Israel's name protected? Or is Massie saying she was on pedo island?
Supposedly one of the last messages between JE and Steve Bannon, was Bannon going to pedo island to film or take pictures. JE was a smooth operator that played both political parties well. Has Bannon answered to this?
Here is just one of the times Massie name drops.
I can save the suspense. If you go to X and search 20 names and their various professions, you will see Massie drop the names in varied responses one at a time.
He is livid with Miriam Adelson for funding against him. She may want the former PM of Israel's name protected? Or is Massie saying she was on pedo island?
Supposedly one of the last messages between JE and Steve Bannon, was Bannon going to pedo island to film or take pictures. JE was a smooth operator that played both political parties well. Has Bannon answered to this?
Here is just one of the times Massie name drops.
Loading Twitter/X Embed...
If tweet fails to load, click here. Posted on 12/19/25 at 7:24 am to cajunangelle
quote:
Has Bannon answered to this?
His claim was he was making a documentary.
Posted on 12/19/25 at 7:30 am to cajunangelle
He keeps naming names yet wont name anyone but Jewish ppl
Hes as pathetic as Candace at this point
Masshole wasnt concerned about Miriam when he endorsed Ron now was he
Hes as pathetic as Candace at this point
Masshole wasnt concerned about Miriam when he endorsed Ron now was he
Posted on 12/19/25 at 7:30 am to RelicBatches86
We all know this release is going to amount to nothing
Posted on 12/19/25 at 8:17 am to SCLibertarian
MoT decides to which party you belong.
This post was edited on 12/19/25 at 9:28 am
Posted on 12/19/25 at 8:23 am to HailHailtoMichigan!
quote:
Just release all the files
How would he release what the DOJ has and if he did would he be breaking the law?
Posted on 12/19/25 at 8:25 am to roadGator
That’s MoT87 back from the ashes?
Posted on 12/19/25 at 8:29 am to lsuguy84
If The Republicans had been smart. They would’ve kept their mouth shut about Epstein. used him to blackmail a bunch of Democrats and profited.
Posted on 12/19/25 at 8:37 am to AlterEd
quote:
Again, imagine saying this stupid shite on the eve of the release of the information Trump signed into law.
No in the least
It’s the swamp rats like you that don’t want it released because muh…. People might get hurt….
Swamp
Posted on 12/19/25 at 8:39 am to SlidellCajun
We want them released. Everyone will be disappointed and dissatisfied though when Trump isn’t involved still. Trump was an informant.
Posted on 12/19/25 at 8:40 am to lsuguy84
Yeah.
Posted on 12/19/25 at 8:45 am to roadGator
Posted on 12/19/25 at 8:51 am to lsuguy84
Posted on 12/19/25 at 9:38 am to Jugbow
quote:
We want them released. Everyone will be disappointed and dissatisfied though when Trump isn’t involved still. Trump was an informant
Don’t care if trump was involved
My belief is that Epstein was working for other interests and he was providing info to those interests to gain leverage
Posted on 12/19/25 at 9:39 am to SlidellCajun
Muh Joos?
Posted on 12/19/25 at 9:40 am to RelicBatches86
I don’t think Trump would allow for any info to be redacted or withheld
Posted on 12/19/25 at 9:41 am to SlidellCajun
The bill doesn’t allow names, sources or classified information to be produced. I don’t think this release will be much of anything due to the legislation wording. Even the speaker encouraged them to change the wording but they didn’t.
Posted on 12/19/25 at 9:41 am to RelicBatches86
Here are the John Does
Loading Twitter/X Embed...
If tweet fails to load, click here. This post was edited on 12/19/25 at 9:44 am
Posted on 12/19/25 at 11:14 am to RelicBatches86
quote:
If we get a large production on Dec. 19 and it does not contain a single name of any male who is accused of a sex crime or sex trafficking or rape or any of these things, then we know they haven’t produced all the documents,” Massie said. “It’s that simple.”
Already setting up for the next grift
It will never end or ever be enough
Page 9 of 10
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News