Started By
Message

re: Mark Levin on Tariffs

Posted on 7/25/18 at 1:36 pm to
Posted by DavidTheGnome
Monroe
Member since Apr 2015
31208 posts
Posted on 7/25/18 at 1:36 pm to
And so given that, the answer is to raise taxes to subsidize them?

edit: i'm thinking you are reading it as if I'm talking about the tariffs the EU has in place which I'm not, I should have been more clear.

Tariffs that the US puts in place hurts our manufacturers.
This post was edited on 7/25/18 at 1:38 pm
Posted by GoCrazyAuburn
Member since Feb 2010
39456 posts
Posted on 7/25/18 at 1:37 pm to
quote:

And so given that, the answer is to raise taxes to subsidize them?



Where have I said I support this? I think you and Roger have some reading comprehension issues. I'm guessing he failed at finding anything, but you're welcome to go back through any of my posts and show me where I said I support the steps that are being taken.
Posted by GumboPot
Member since Mar 2009
138911 posts
Posted on 7/25/18 at 1:42 pm to
The main sources of revenue to the federal government are income taxes, payroll taxes and cooperate taxes. Those three sources make up 91% of all federal government revenue.

The remaining 9% of federal government revenue consists of many many other taxes and included in that 9% are tariffs.

We seem to be making a mountain out of a mold hill with these tariff arguments.
Posted by DavidTheGnome
Monroe
Member since Apr 2015
31208 posts
Posted on 7/25/18 at 1:44 pm to
I'm reading through the thread backwards so may have taken out of context.

quote:

You can't just look at it from a consumer perspective though.



Is implying that from a domestic manufacturing standpoint tariffs are good, they aren't. They may be good for certain industry's but overall US manufacturing is hurt due to rising prices of raw materials and parts. And unrelated industries get dragged into it. A car tariff going up can result in a retaliatory tariff on milk exports. Put up a tariff on corn and the computer industry gets hurt, etc.
Posted by DavidTheGnome
Monroe
Member since Apr 2015
31208 posts
Posted on 7/25/18 at 1:47 pm to
I member when conservatives were anti-tax. Do y'all member?
Posted by stuntman
Florida
Member since Jan 2013
10441 posts
Posted on 7/25/18 at 1:48 pm to
I member.
Posted by GoCrazyAuburn
Member since Feb 2010
39456 posts
Posted on 7/25/18 at 1:48 pm to
quote:

I'm reading through the thread backwards so may have taken out of context.



Yes. The point of that post was responding to a line of questioning where a poster was basically arguing that other countries having high tariffs on our goods was good for us. I was not talking about our tariffs, I was talking about tariffs on our goods, but the only thing Roger was discussing was increasing out tariffs. Thus my point, you can't just look at it from the consumer. We have to find a way to help the manufacturer too, on the selling side.

The very next sentence you didn't quote:
quote:

Again, I don't disagree that tariffs hurt consumers. Other country's tariffs hurt our manufacturers though. Arguing otherwise is just silly.


My original question was how do we solve large tariff discrepancies. My point in what you quoted is that we can't solely look at at tariffs on stuff we import (the consumer side). We have to look at the industrial & manufacturing side as well with tariffs other countries have on us. So, back to my original question, if they are not fair, how do we improve them in our favor.

I agreed multiple times in other posts that raising our tariffs isn't a great idea. My question was okay, so if that is off the table as a tactic, what is the alternative. It took three pages to get one answer.
This post was edited on 7/25/18 at 1:52 pm
Posted by GumboPot
Member since Mar 2009
138911 posts
Posted on 7/25/18 at 1:52 pm to
quote:

I member when conservatives were anti-tax. Do y'all member?




I'm anti tax but fighting over something that only contributes to 1.6% of federal tax revenues is not a large return on your effort.

Posted by DavidTheGnome
Monroe
Member since Apr 2015
31208 posts
Posted on 7/25/18 at 1:53 pm to
Not sure what the answer is. Have trade negotiations until you reach that point. Maybe you can't reach that point. But a trade war doesn't get you there.
Posted by narddogg81
Vancouver
Member since Jan 2012
21825 posts
Posted on 7/25/18 at 1:55 pm to
quote:

Does that make Levin a traitorous globalist, or is Trump possibly wrong on this?

he's only wrong if he thinks these tariffs see anything other than a big bargaining chip with the ultimate goal being even more free trade with fair terms for us
Posted by CivilTiger83
Member since Dec 2017
2525 posts
Posted on 7/25/18 at 2:04 pm to
quote:

So the current tariffs we pay are AOK but the ones which don’t yet exist that Trump is threatening to impose in order to get the current ones reduced are somehow catastrophic???


Nobody is saying the old ones are okay, but when you start escalating the tariffs the price increases can be sudden and very disruptive to businesses.

Let's say you make specialized bearings in the US that you sell abroad. Tariffs jack up the price of steel domestically. Now your competitors in other countries are getting the cheapest steel from say China. You cannot price that into your product abroad, because your competitors are not dropping their price. Manufacturing businesses are often low margin... that kind of disruption can be fatal in a matter of months. You don't have time to wait for a better deal.

Trump doesn't understand the dynamic of how cheaper raw goods from China may in one instance hurt our steel mills, but at the same time, cutting off access to the cheapest raw materials on the market is a killer to manufacturing companies that sell products that use Chinese steel.

This is a big deal because Trump has the power to throw our international manufacturing and trading into chaos in a matter of weeks. It's too much power in that hands of a single individual, and our founders never intended for a President to wield that power.
Posted by GumboPot
Member since Mar 2009
138911 posts
Posted on 7/25/18 at 2:11 pm to
Mark always uses the Smoot-Hawley Tariff Act of 1930 as his example of why tariffs are bad.

The issue with this argument is that we were also under fairly new and large income taxes and tariffs still maintained a large portion of federal tax revenue. So it was a combined whammy of large income taxes and high tariffs that sunk the economy. Not just tariffs. It wasn't until the government relented on tariffs and relied on income taxes at the beginning of WWII that we came out of the depression.

But prior to income taxes the federal government survived off of tariffs and other taxes like excise taxes.

Notice how progressives never blame the new income taxes on the Great Depression. Tariffs almost always get the blame.

Why? Because income taxes are more "progressive" and tax the rich. Whereas tariffs are more regressive and tax everyone.

Income taxes are more socialists because the seek to hurt the producers.

If I have to pay taxes I prefer the regressive type.
Posted by Robin Masters
Birmingham
Member since Jul 2010
34831 posts
Posted on 7/25/18 at 2:14 pm to
quote:


Trump doesn't understand the dynamic of how cheaper raw goods from China may in one instance hurt our steel mills, but at the same time, cutting off access to the cheapest raw materials on the market is a killer to manufacturing companies that sell products that use Chinese steel.



That’s quite an assumption regarding Trump. I don’t think you really know what he knows or not. But what’s obvious is that you fully support the status quo whereby our exports receive a heavy burden so the can be less of a value in other markets. You seem to be taking up the cause of our competition and instead of asking the questions you should be about the CURRENT tarriffs which affect on RIGHT NOW, you are chopping us at the knees before the negotiations even get started. Maybe show some backbone and confidence so that, at least we, present a somewhat unified front ready to stand up for our industries.
Posted by CivilTiger83
Member since Dec 2017
2525 posts
Posted on 7/25/18 at 2:35 pm to
quote:

You seem to be taking up the cause of our competition and instead of asking the questions you should be about the CURRENT tarriffs which affect on RIGHT NOW, you are chopping us at the knees before the negotiations even get started. Maybe show some backbone and confidence so that, at least we, present a somewhat unified front ready to stand up for our industries.


I am trying to take a stand for our industries. Our auto, farm and manufacturing industries are for the most part saying they don't want this.

Let's talk policy based on its merits, and not get caught up in taking political sides for the sake of taking political sides. We show we are no better than liberals when we do that.

If you want to refute the basic logic of the arguments I put forward on how tariffs hurt many manufacturers, I am all ears.
Posted by CorporateTiger
Member since Aug 2014
10700 posts
Posted on 7/25/18 at 2:45 pm to
I didn’t realize people on here loved giving their tax dollars away to soybean farmers so much.

Can’t wait for the next round of subsidies using my dollars to make up from this great bargaining chip.
Posted by Lg
Hayden, Alabama
Member since Jul 2011
8380 posts
Posted on 7/25/18 at 2:48 pm to
quote:

manufacturing industries


You think our steel workers like all of that cheap Chinese steel flooding our market. Can't compete when the trade is at such an imbalance.
Posted by Robin Masters
Birmingham
Member since Jul 2010
34831 posts
Posted on 7/25/18 at 2:51 pm to
quote:

I am trying to take a stand for our industries. Our auto, farm and manufacturing industries are for the most part saying they don't want this.


I don’t doubt your heart is in the right place and your reaction is a rational one. However it isn’t smart or intelligent negotiation tactic and your need to be right on this issue will ironically make the outcome you fear infinitely more realistic.

Assume our trade partners do not want us to impose tariffs as a given.
In senecio A, Trump threatens tariffs and his unified constituents all rally in unison and say, “We support what’s fair for our country despite short term pain! We will persevere!!” Our trade partners will then say, “shite. They are serious and Trump will impose tariffs and his people are behind him. I guess We better drop ours. “

In scenario B, Trump threatens tariffs and half or more of the US citizens piss and moan about how negative the tariffs will be, failing to even mention at all the current tariffs being imposed on us. Our trade partners listen to the lack of support and say, “his people do not stand with him and so they will vote him out if he imposed tariffs. Let’s wait him out.”

See why it’s important to stand together as a country???
Posted by roadGator
Member since Feb 2009
154230 posts
Posted on 7/25/18 at 2:55 pm to
Posted by GoCrazyAuburn
Member since Feb 2010
39456 posts
Posted on 7/25/18 at 3:07 pm to
quote:

believe Trump is meeting with the EU to do this very thing. I agree this would be great. If they refuse, are there any other alternatives?


I believe he's already alienated the Europeans, and the Japanese...




...
first pageprev pagePage 12 of 13Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram