Started By
Message

re: Manchin on Senate gun deal: ‘No law-abiding gun owner should be offended by this’

Posted on 6/13/22 at 9:25 pm to
Posted by KAGTASTIC
Member since Feb 2022
7989 posts
Posted on 6/13/22 at 9:25 pm to
quote:

emailed Cornyn today to say I will not vote to re-elect him if they continue with the red flag provision


He doesn't care. Why all the 10 repubs are ones with 4-5 yrs left on their current term or retiring.
Posted by diat150
Louisiana
Member since Jun 2005
47810 posts
Posted on 6/13/22 at 9:27 pm to
Do we have to read it to see whats in it?
Posted by SmackoverHawg
Member since Oct 2011
31609 posts
Posted on 6/13/22 at 9:45 pm to
Shall not be infringed. Cannot give an inch. Too many ways to abuse it. This is the line in the sand. There is no compromise.

SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED!!! English mf'ers!!! Do you speak it? Those of you wanting to throw them a bone will soon regret it when your dumbasses are sitting around in a FEMA camp saying"I didn't think they'd do that." Just like you have on everything else they've done over the last 20 years. Wake up you ignorant shits. You comfortable life is a facade and is about to be over with.
Posted by squid_hunt
Baton Rouge
Member since Jan 2021
11272 posts
Posted on 6/13/22 at 9:48 pm to
How about taxpayers in the middle of the worst inflation the country has ever seen? Should they be upset about pumping more fake money in the economy?
Posted by Atlas_Shrugged
Ocean Springs, MS
Member since May 2022
570 posts
Posted on 6/13/22 at 11:11 pm to
Yes if you just sell someone a gun that you just met or they are your brother and they commit a crime with it you are liable for that crime.
Posted by Texas Yarddog
Member since Apr 2018
3012 posts
Posted on 6/13/22 at 11:23 pm to
There were laws against it back in 2010. That didn't stop the Feds from Fast & Furious or Project Gunrunner.

Eric Holder is still walking free after allowing straw purchases and perjuring himself before Congress.

Laws for thee, not for me.

And F Cornin for following the liberals lead on this. What a waste of a seat.
Posted by Tigers2010a
Member since Jul 2021
3627 posts
Posted on 6/13/22 at 11:52 pm to
Where is McConnell cracking the whip to punish those 10 Benedict Arnolds? Threaten them with punishment so dire that they change their minds about handling the left the tools to disarm the right?????
Posted by jatilen
Member since May 2020
13608 posts
Posted on 6/14/22 at 12:01 am to
quote:

Do we have to pass it to see whats in it?


Fixed it for you
Posted by SleepyJoe
Member since Apr 2022
451 posts
Posted on 6/14/22 at 12:04 am to
I want aptitude tests for colored's and women in order to vote. We cannot continue to let some of these people vote. It's dangerous and puts us all at risk. Every single colored and every single woman will be able to vote with a satisfactory test. So basically not one single colored or woman that isn't flagged will lose their voting rights whatsoever and you have nothing to worry about.

Just like president Biden has said over and over. Colored's and women's right to vote is not and was never absolute.
Posted by AndyCBR
Baton Rouge, LA
Member since Nov 2012
8222 posts
Posted on 6/14/22 at 6:09 am to
quote:

"something that’s sensible and reasonable"


Whenever you hear these words from a politician, the exact opposite is happening.
Posted by OGtigerfan87
North La
Member since Feb 2019
3950 posts
Posted on 6/14/22 at 7:42 am to
Eh seems reasonable enough
Posted by MFn GIMP
Member since Feb 2011
23008 posts
Posted on 6/14/22 at 8:07 am to
quote:

“something that’s sensible and reasonable,”

Red flag laws are never sensible or reasonable. How long will it be until having a different political opinion than the left will result in a judge taking away your guns? Sooner than most think.
Posted by Wtodd
Tampa, FL
Member since Oct 2013
68544 posts
Posted on 6/14/22 at 8:09 am to
So a 'D' thinks there are acceptable violations to the 2nd amendment

Color me shocked and offended
Posted by AggieHank86
Texas
Member since Sep 2013
44345 posts
Posted on 6/14/22 at 8:13 am to
quote:

pompous
Not an adjective I have seen used to describe Joe Manchin.
Posted by Deek
Member since Sep 2013
1327 posts
Posted on 6/14/22 at 8:43 am to
How does any of this prevent homeboy from shooting me??
Posted by DaTruth7
Member since Apr 2020
4182 posts
Posted on 6/14/22 at 8:47 am to
Why not let each state handle this themselves? The federal government will frick us until there is no arse left.
Posted by BigMob
Georgia
Member since Oct 2021
7625 posts
Posted on 6/14/22 at 8:50 am to
You get this twisted watered down view of the 2nd Amendment when you fight the gun grabbers with arguments centered around hunting, sport shooting, and even home defense.

The message needs to be plain and simple , the 2nd Amendment is in place for citizens to kill tyrants if the necessity arises with the modern day “musket”, and it “shall not be infringed.”

Frick all this compromise soft shite.
Posted by winkchance
St. George, LA
Member since Jul 2016
6677 posts
Posted on 6/14/22 at 9:22 am to
None of it addresses the criminal behavior which spawned its creation. The only thing it targets is law abiding citizens. Manchin back to being a tool.
Posted by Nosevens
Member since Apr 2019
19357 posts
Posted on 6/14/22 at 9:22 am to
Thats not correct, it does and is totally expressing it use
Posted by AggieHank86
Texas
Member since Sep 2013
44345 posts
Posted on 6/14/22 at 9:32 am to
quote:

Why not let each state handle this themselves?.
That SHOULD be the law, bc the Bill of Rights was never intended to restrict the actions of anything other than the FEDERAL government.

But we got saddled with the (unsupportable) Incorporation Doctrine, and here we are.
This post was edited on 6/14/22 at 9:34 am
first pageprev pagePage 3 of 3Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram