Started By
Message
locked post

Mall of La / BR General petition for Annexation into City

Posted on 5/5/14 at 12:37 pm
Posted by Mickey Goldmill
Baton Rouge
Member since Mar 2010
22996 posts
Posted on 5/5/14 at 12:37 pm
LINK

quote:

The Mall of Louisiana and Baton Rouge General are petitioning for annexation into the city of Baton Rouge.

In a news release announcing the joint petition, Baton Rouge General board members cited the potential economic impact that an effort to create a new city in the southern unincorporated area of East Baton Rouge Parish could have on Baton Rouge.

quote:

The mall and hospital annexation proposal, which now goes to the Metro Council, is just the latest hurdle to St. George’s incorporation.

St. George organizers told The Advocate that they weren’t surprised by the annexation petition but were disappointed.

“Annexation of the Mall of Louisiana could likely invalidate the current petition process,” St. George spokesman Lionel Rainey said. “This is nothing more than the Baton Rouge City Parish Government yet again trying to inject themselves into the legal, petition process and deny over 70,000 registered voters the right to vote. This is city government and politics at its very worst.”


UPDATE: Our Lady of the Lake also petitions for Annexation. LINK

quote:

"Our Lady of the Lake has filed an annexation petition with the City asking that the hospital’s property contiguous to the Essen/Hennessy campus be incorporated within the city limits. Today the hospital campus is divided with the main hospital and Hennessy Blvd medical office buildings operating within the current Baton Rouge city limits while the Tau Center and an adjacent 60-acres are outside the city limits, yet operate within the parish. Straddling the city/parish boundary creates challenges with first responders such as fire or law enforcement, as well as separate planning and zoning commissions.


This post was edited on 5/5/14 at 3:29 pm
Posted by hawkster
Member since Aug 2010
6227 posts
Posted on 5/5/14 at 12:54 pm to
Ascension, Livingston, Central and Zachary strongly support this move.
Posted by Layabout
Baton Rouge
Member since Jul 2011
11082 posts
Posted on 5/5/14 at 12:55 pm to
Did they really expect the city to just roll over and let the St. George people grab a big chunk of their tax revenue? Costco and Celtic Studios will be next.
Posted by Mo Jeaux
Member since Aug 2008
58510 posts
Posted on 5/5/14 at 12:57 pm to
Gotta keep those sneaker stores in Baton Rouge proper.
Posted by Dorothy
Munchkinland
Member since Oct 2008
18153 posts
Posted on 5/5/14 at 12:57 pm to
quote:

Costco and Celtic Studios will be next.



Their annexation was already approved last month. LINK
This post was edited on 5/5/14 at 12:58 pm
Posted by theunknownknight
Baton Rouge
Member since Sep 2005
57210 posts
Posted on 5/5/14 at 12:57 pm to
I'm actually glad about this now. The Mall of La is going to crap really fast.
Posted by doubleb
Baton Rouge
Member since Aug 2006
35824 posts
Posted on 5/5/14 at 12:58 pm to
This was not unexpected, and no doubt will seriously hurt the SG efforts.

It's hard enough to overcome city hall, but when they start taking parts and pieces away from you to keep you in your place, there is little you can do.

BTW, exactly what are the details of the annexation? Since neither the BRGH or the Mall "touch" BR, can they just request annexation without the other property owners "between" their properties and the city agreeing or have these property owners joined in with the two principal entities?

Just curious, because no matter what I'm thinking it's a done deal.

Well maybe the BRAF plan might help the school situation. We shall see.

Thxs for the link Mickey.

ETA: after reading the petition linked in the Advocate article, I believe they are including the railroad tracks to tie the city to the affected properties if I understand it correctly.

I'd bet they can get L'Auberge the same way. LOL
When it's time for desperate measures govt. can get really creative.
This post was edited on 5/5/14 at 1:05 pm
Posted by LSURussian
Member since Feb 2005
126854 posts
Posted on 5/5/14 at 1:01 pm to
quote:

“Annexation of the Mall of Louisiana could likely invalidate the current petition process,” St. George spokesman Lionel Rainey said.

Why would that be?
Posted by Dorothy
Munchkinland
Member since Oct 2008
18153 posts
Posted on 5/5/14 at 1:03 pm to
quote:

Since neither the BRGH or the Mall "touch" BR, can they just request annexation without the other property owners "between" their properties and the city agreeing or have these property owners joined in with the two principal entities?


I haven't looked at the map, but the NOLA.com article says
quote:

Baton Rouge General's Bluebonnet campus is currently in the unincorporated area of the parish and provides the city-parish with a contiguous path to annex the mall.


so
This post was edited on 5/5/14 at 1:04 pm
Posted by urinetrouble
Member since Oct 2007
20501 posts
Posted on 5/5/14 at 1:04 pm to
OLOL is requesting annexation as well.
Posted by Dorothy
Munchkinland
Member since Oct 2008
18153 posts
Posted on 5/5/14 at 1:05 pm to
quote:

“Annexation of the Mall of Louisiana could likely invalidate the current petition process,” St. George spokesman Lionel Rainey said.


quote:

Why would that be?


Maybe they would have to throw out any resident signatures from nearby? Again, I haven't studied the maps to see if they include any residential areas, but there are some apartments/condos between Essen & BR General.
Posted by urinetrouble
Member since Oct 2007
20501 posts
Posted on 5/5/14 at 1:05 pm to
quote:

LSURussian


You called it.
Posted by doubleb
Baton Rouge
Member since Aug 2006
35824 posts
Posted on 5/5/14 at 1:06 pm to
quote:

Why would that be?


Makes no sense unless the petition describes a legal entity and this would radically change that description.
Posted by doubleb
Baton Rouge
Member since Aug 2006
35824 posts
Posted on 5/5/14 at 1:06 pm to
quote:

You called it.


He's a genius, no one could see this coming.
Posted by urinetrouble
Member since Oct 2007
20501 posts
Posted on 5/5/14 at 1:08 pm to
I didn't say that. I just distinctly remember him saying this would happen very early on in discussions regarding feasibility.

I didn't realize they had such a simple path, honestly.
This post was edited on 5/5/14 at 1:09 pm
Posted by udtiger
Over your left shoulder
Member since Nov 2006
98287 posts
Posted on 5/5/14 at 1:09 pm to
quote:

Maybe they would have to throw out any resident signatures from nearby?


I don't know if this is it since these are all commercial properties. I think it has more to do with the proposed boundaries of St. George as stated in the petition. It has been a while since I have signed, but I do not believe it just says "unincorporated areas."

Congrats City of Baton Rouge, amazing what you can do when you out-rhetoric and out-lie your opposition.
Posted by Dorothy
Munchkinland
Member since Oct 2008
18153 posts
Posted on 5/5/14 at 1:09 pm to
quote:

Makes no sense unless the petition describes a legal entity and this would radically change that description.


That's what I was wondering also. Can you "amend" a petition to redefine the boundaries? Wouldn't they have had to do that anyway with the loss of the Costco/Celtic Studios area?
Posted by LSURussian
Member since Feb 2005
126854 posts
Posted on 5/5/14 at 1:11 pm to
quote:

LSURussian



You called it.

Thanks, but my prediction didn't require a genius to make it, although technically I am a genius according to Mensa.

Back last September when the petition drive first started and I posted on here there was no way the city of BR was going to let the Mall's sales taxes walk away, I was told I was wrong...along with being called a few choice names.

Now the SG proponents will likely claim they knew all along the Mall would opt to be in BR. Just watch and see if that doesn't happen.
Posted by doubleb
Baton Rouge
Member since Aug 2006
35824 posts
Posted on 5/5/14 at 1:15 pm to
quote:

OLOL is requesting annexation as well.


The one in Livingston perhaps, the main campus is already in the city.
Posted by LSURussian
Member since Feb 2005
126854 posts
Posted on 5/5/14 at 1:16 pm to
quote:

Makes no sense unless the petition describes a legal entity and this would radically change that description.



That's what I was wondering also. Can you "amend" a petition to redefine the boundaries? Wouldn't they have had to do that anyway with the loss of the Costco/Celtic Studios area?
It seems to me it would not invalidate the entire petition drive.

They would just have to remove the signatures of the few residents who might live in the included area who signed.

I'm thinking it's likely Rainey is already looking for an excuse to suspend the petition drive by blaming this annexation rather than admitting they couldn't get the required number of signatures. It's merely a face-saving excuse.
Jump to page
Page 1 2 3 4 5 ... 26
Jump to page
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 26Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram