Started By
Message

re: Major League Pitcher Turns Down Padres $40 Million Offer Due To State Taxes

Posted on 3/2/26 at 7:32 pm to
Posted by TFH
Member since Apr 2016
4229 posts
Posted on 3/2/26 at 7:32 pm to
quote:

And players are taxed in each state they play in and contracts are paid out during the season

You sure about that? I’ve worked in nearly every state and some territories and only pay taxes in my home state. I’ve spent over a month in several states working at a time.
Posted by Figgy
CenCal
Member since May 2020
10350 posts
Posted on 3/2/26 at 7:34 pm to
Padres.

I wouldn’t want to play for that loser organization either. I want to win.
Posted by AUJACK
Member since Sep 2020
1390 posts
Posted on 3/2/26 at 7:35 pm to
quote:

Do you need Braille


Posted by SDVTiger
Cabo San Lucas
Member since Nov 2011
98236 posts
Posted on 3/2/26 at 7:37 pm to
quote:

That’s all I see in your post as you try to justify the communist thieves that have turned your state into shite


This is what all the retards say then they visit SD and wish they could move here
Posted by YMCA
It's Fun to Stay
Member since May 2011
5123 posts
Posted on 3/2/26 at 7:39 pm to
quote:

They’ll just quietly make a law that exempts sports players from high taxes.


Is that what they’re doing in these states ending state taxes on NIL money for college athletes?
Posted by AUJACK
Member since Sep 2020
1390 posts
Posted on 3/2/26 at 7:43 pm to
Texas does not have a State Income tax on wages, interest, dividends, or retirement income.
Posted by Mo Jeaux
Member since Aug 2008
63786 posts
Posted on 3/2/26 at 7:54 pm to
quote:

I’ve worked in nearly every state and some territories and only pay taxes in my home state. I’ve spent over a month in several states working at a time.


There are a lot of different factors that go into this.
Posted by Rekrul
Member since Feb 2007
9559 posts
Posted on 3/2/26 at 8:00 pm to
quote:

This is what all the retards say then they visit SD and wish they could move here


You just called yourself a retard without even realizing it, you don’t realize it because you’re a retard
Posted by Smokedawg
Finding Lennay Kekua
Member since Dec 2008
5661 posts
Posted on 3/2/26 at 8:02 pm to
quote:

The Dodgers defer their contracts so their players can avoid this. They won’t be state residents required to pay taxes when the bulk of their contracts are owed.
no, they do it so they can sign the biggest free agents and not being a big hit on the payroll immediately. So it lets them offer larger contracts while not paying an even more insane threshold tax the dodgers currently pay.
Posted by lurking
Member since Nov 2022
2407 posts
Posted on 3/2/26 at 8:06 pm to
That’s part of it. The players still have to agree to the contract. Keeping as much money as possible is why they agree to a deferral.

Shohei is making 2mm of a 700mm contract this season for example because by the time 2034 rolls around and he’s owed the almost 98% of said 700mm contract he agreed to, he’ll be retired and out of CA.
Posted by Boomdaddy65201
BoCoMo
Member since Mar 2020
4529 posts
Posted on 3/2/26 at 8:13 pm to
quote:

Ask Sam Darnold how much he made for the Super Bowl. Spoiler alert, he owed money because of California’s jock tax.


Exactly, came here to say exactly this. There was a really good thread in regards to this on the MSB board during SB week.

Because of the fact that the NFL mandates that each SB team be available to the media for a bare minimum of at least 8 days at the game’s locale leading up to the game, both teams were subject to California’s tax laws. As all NFL teams pay their players over a 18 week schedule not a year round salary. The playoffs and Super Bowl payouts are payed by the league and on a larger pay scale as a team progresses, i.e. players make more for a league championship game than a wildcard game.

California taxed the players on their yearly income and not that post season bonus as a result the players that won the SB received a $187,000ish stipend from the league but Darnold makes $30Mish a year, so it cost him $285,000ish to play the game.

quote:

NFL players, particularly in high-tax states like California, face "8-day tax" liabilities because of jock taxes applied to their income for days spent working (practicing, playing, media) in a specific, non-resident jurisdiction. For events like the Super Bowl, players often arrive ~8 days early, enabling states to tax a prorated share of their season earnings at high rates, often exceeding 13%.
Posted by baldona
Florida
Member since Feb 2016
24215 posts
Posted on 3/2/26 at 8:16 pm to
quote:

Shohei is making 2mm of a 700mm contract this season for example because by the time 2034 rolls around and he’s owed the almost 98% of said 700mm contract he agreed to, he’ll be retired and out of CA.


I’m not a cpa but I don’t see how it’s that easy. If the dodgers are paying him and the Dodgers are in CA, whether or not he is living in CA he is being paid by a company in CA. So how does this help him? I’m assuming CA is hitting him by where he was paid. His state of residency could also hit him for being a resident

Posted by Tiger Prawn
Member since Dec 2016
25857 posts
Posted on 3/2/26 at 8:17 pm to
quote:

Yeah its not like the dodgers have the greatest baseball talent in the world or anything
Who wisely took a contract where the vast majority of his money is deferred payments when he’ll be retired and can claim residency in a low tax state
Posted by Nado Jenkins83
Land of the Free
Member since Nov 2012
66103 posts
Posted on 3/2/26 at 8:20 pm to
Some poor nigerian gonna have to sell his family back home to pay Cali tax
Posted by lurking
Member since Nov 2022
2407 posts
Posted on 3/2/26 at 8:20 pm to
He’s not avoiding taxes entirely just the heavy penalty of being paid at a higher rate while being a resident of CA.
Posted by baldona
Florida
Member since Feb 2016
24215 posts
Posted on 3/2/26 at 8:21 pm to
quote:

He’s not avoiding taxes entirely just the heavy penalty of being paid at a higher rate while being a resident of CA.


Again, jock tax doesn’t matter where you live.
Posted by Tiger Prawn
Member since Dec 2016
25857 posts
Posted on 3/2/26 at 8:24 pm to
quote:

If the dodgers are paying him and the Dodgers are in CA, whether or not he is living in CA he is being paid by a company in CA.
If you work for a company that’s HQ is in NYC but you live and work only in Florida for the year, then you don’t owe any taxes to New York.

Same logic is applicable here. Shohei will be taxed on that deferred money based on where he’s a resident at for that year. Now if he moves back to Japan, I’m not sure if the US fed government will try to tax him…but a state can’t tax him if he did not live or work in the state that year. For his salary while he’s actually playing, he’ll get taxed in each state the team plays in that year and his state taxes are pro-rated by the number of games or days in the state throughout the year
Posted by lurking
Member since Nov 2022
2407 posts
Posted on 3/2/26 at 8:24 pm to
I think you’re confused about the jock tax. They can’t tax him using that when he’s no longer playing. It’s not retroactive.
Posted by Tiger Prawn
Member since Dec 2016
25857 posts
Posted on 3/2/26 at 8:28 pm to
quote:

Again, jock tax doesn’t matter where you live.
Correct, on salary paid in years while he’s still an active player

Once he’s retired and getting paid massive amounts of deferred money, it does matter where he lives. California won’t be able to tax that money unless he’s still living in CA in retirement
Posted by dickkellog
little rock
Member since Dec 2024
2949 posts
Posted on 3/2/26 at 8:30 pm to
you still have to pay california taxes for every day you play in cali, did you not see any of the super bowl threads?
first pageprev pagePage 2 of 3Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram