Started By
Message

re: Luke Cage or Black Panther?

Posted on 9/3/19 at 5:49 pm to
Posted by AggieHank86
Texas
Member since Sep 2013
44345 posts
Posted on 9/3/19 at 5:49 pm to
quote:

Not really. Black Dynamite is a spoof.
Fair enough.
Posted by TerryDawg03
The Deep South
Member since Dec 2012
17932 posts
Posted on 9/3/19 at 6:38 pm to
quote:

Which is the worse example of neo-Blaxploitation in the Marvel Universe? Why?


Both characters have been around for decades.

Just wasted 60 seconds posting in this thread.
Posted by Flats
Member since Jul 2019
28042 posts
Posted on 9/3/19 at 6:44 pm to
quote:

Wow the politics of comic books....


The left politicizes everything. Every. Thing.
Posted by Rebel
Graceland
Member since Jan 2005
143699 posts
Posted on 9/3/19 at 6:53 pm to
There is only one black super hero for me.

The Brown Hornet!

Posted by Jorts R Us
Member since Aug 2013
17498 posts
Posted on 9/3/19 at 6:56 pm to
quote:

The left politicizes everything. Every. Thing.


Say what you want, but the usual list of characters trying to politicize the M/TV board ain't from the left.

Parmen and CAD probably have some posts they can copy and paste into this thread.
This post was edited on 9/3/19 at 6:58 pm
Posted by AggieHank86
Texas
Member since Sep 2013
44345 posts
Posted on 9/3/19 at 6:57 pm to
quote:

quote:

Which is the worse example of neo-Blaxploitation in the Marvel Universe? Why?
Both characters have been around for decades.
Two legitimate posts on an entire thread. I am trying to have a conversation in a room populated primarily by rhesus monkeys.

Posted by Flats
Member since Jul 2019
28042 posts
Posted on 9/3/19 at 7:12 pm to
quote:

Two legitimate posts on an entire thread. I am trying to have a conversation in a room populated primarily by rhesus monkeys.



It’s almost as if being pointlessly argumentative 95% of the time impacts how people respond to you the other 5%
Posted by Rebel
Graceland
Member since Jan 2005
143699 posts
Posted on 9/3/19 at 7:13 pm to
quote:

It’s almost as if being pointlessly argumentative 95% of the time impacts how people respond to you the other 5%


Posted by AggieHank86
Texas
Member since Sep 2013
44345 posts
Posted on 9/3/19 at 7:19 pm to
quote:

It’s almost as if being pointlessly argumentative 95% of the time impacts how people respond to you the other 5%
bullshite.

I admit to being a smartass on maybe 10-20% of my initial posts, but the rest are mostly just thoughts and analyses that vary from the majority. 95% of the responses to me are non-substantive, and about half of those are purely personal attacks and about 40% are posters who completely mischaracterize what I said ... though in many cases I cannot say whether that mischaracterization arises from ill motives, illiteracy or pure stupidity.

I try to correct the mischaracterizations, and a distressing percentage will continue to argue that I said something completely different from what I actually said. Yep, exchanges with those morons can last a while.

Yeah, I also get back into the faces of those making personal attacks, when they lack the cerebral horsepower to engage in actual analysis. No apologies for that, because I do NOT do so as long as the other party is not engaging in personal attacks.
This post was edited on 9/3/19 at 7:45 pm
Posted by Saint Alfonzo
Member since Jan 2019
30112 posts
Posted on 9/3/19 at 7:54 pm to
quote:

bullshite. I admit to being a smartass on maybe 10-20% of my initial posts, but the rest are mostly just thoughts and analyses that vary from the majority. 95% of the responses to me are non-substantive, and about half of those are purely personal attacks. Yeah, I get back into the faces of those making personal attacks without the cerebral horsepower to engage in actual analysis. No apologies for that.


Maybe you shouldn't put yourself forth as being exceptional. Look at this post, for example. Are your thoughts and analysis that varied from the norm? Are other responses really non-substantive? Do others really lack the cerebral horsepower to engage with you? You come across as arrogant and condescending. You're not as smart as you think you are and others aren't as dumb as you wish them to be.

As far as this thread goes, there's nothing "neo-blaxploitative" about Black Panther or Luke Cage. It's fricking insulting to black people that you tried to characterize them as such. Are black people allowed to have black-focused cinema without people like you trying to peg them as being used in some fashion? Maybe they're just stories based on long-running comics. If you understood the medium your opinion might not suck as much. Black people enjoyed Black Panther for the same reasons they liked Blade. A black super hero on the big screen; something that isn't depicted very often. Why shite on that with your pseudo-intellectual hot take?
Posted by AggieHank86
Texas
Member since Sep 2013
44345 posts
Posted on 9/3/19 at 8:00 pm to
quote:

there's nothing "neo-blaxploitative" about Black Panther or Luke Cage. It's fricking insulting to black people that you tried to characterize them as such. Are black people allowed to have black-focused cinema without people like you trying to peg them as being used in some fashion? Maybe they're just stories based on long-running comics. If you understood the medium your opinion might not suck as much. Black people enjoyed Black Panther for the same reasons they liked Blade. A black super hero on the big screen; something that isn't depicted very often. Why shite on that with your pseudo-intellectual hot take?
After this rant, I can only infer that you are unfamiliar with the Blaxploitation film genre, primarily from the 1970s.

The simple facts are that those films were directed primarily toward a Black audience AND that they did well with that audience. That is neither insulting nor condescending. It is simply an analysis of a filmmaking genre, and hardly a controversial one.

If you do not think that either film falls within the same genre as Shaft, Superfly, and Foxy Brown, you are certainly free to voice that opinion. Exploring those notions is why I started the thread.
This post was edited on 9/3/19 at 8:11 pm
Posted by BigJim
Baton Rouge
Member since Jan 2010
15060 posts
Posted on 9/3/19 at 8:01 pm to
?

I liked them both
Posted by roadGator
DeBoar’s dome
Member since Feb 2009
157539 posts
Posted on 9/3/19 at 8:04 pm to
I love it when he whitesplains to our black friends.
Posted by AggieHank86
Texas
Member since Sep 2013
44345 posts
Posted on 9/3/19 at 8:12 pm to
quote:

I liked them both
So did I.
Posted by Saint Alfonzo
Member since Jan 2019
30112 posts
Posted on 9/3/19 at 8:13 pm to
quote:

After this rant, I can only infer that you are unfamiliar with tje Blaxploitation film genre, primarily from the 1970s. The simple facts are that those films were directed primarily toward a Black audience AND that they did well with that audience. That is neither insulting nor condescending. It is simply an analysis of a filmmaking genre, and hardly a controversial one.


See, there you go again with that snarky "I'm smarter than you" bullshite. What's condescending is you think Black Panther is blaxploitation because black people enjoyed it. Even though it's a big budget blockbuster movie that's part of an over-arching cinematic universe with a broad audience and not a low budget anti-establishment film. Maybe if they put Huggie Bear and Pam Grier's tits in the sequel your idiotic argument would hold water.
Posted by Flats
Member since Jul 2019
28042 posts
Posted on 9/3/19 at 8:18 pm to


I could maybe see a 70s black movie angle to Luke Cage but not BP, which I thought was pretty overrated for obvious reasons but not exploitative. Pandering, yes, but I can't find an exploitation angle.
Posted by TizzyT4theUofA
This side of eternity
Member since Jun 2016
12435 posts
Posted on 9/3/19 at 8:18 pm to
quote:

You read comics.... not surprised


You’re an idiot. A great number of comic readers are more conservative in their views and hate the sjw bull crap that is being pushed in modern comics.
Posted by AggieHank86
Texas
Member since Sep 2013
44345 posts
Posted on 9/3/19 at 8:24 pm to
quote:

What's condescending is you think Black Panther is blaxploitation because black people enjoyed it. Even though it's a big budget blockbuster movie that's part of an over-arching cinematic universe with a broad audience and not a low budget anti-establishment film. Maybe if they put Huggie Bear and Pam Grier's tits in the sequel your idiotic argument would hold water.
See, there YOU go again, claiming I said something that I did not remotely say. NOWHERE did I say that BP was Blaxploitation just because Black folks like the film. Those are YOUR words.

Your overall comment is indicative of PC culture. You are afraid to explore the simple question of whether a film falls into a defined genre, SIMPLY because that genre is race-related. Would you express the same reticence about a discussion of whether Sword of Shanarra is more SciFi (post-Apoxolypse) or “Fantasy?” Of course not.

Is Black Panther a Blaxploitation film? I am not afraid to conduct that analysis, and it is sad that you ARE. The film features an idealized Black society, depicts Black technology as superior to White technology, and portrays “Whitey” as an evil enemy (in the eyes of some characters, at a minimum).

Luke Cage is almost a textbook example, right down to the music selection.

I enjoyed the Black Panther film, and I enjoyed the Luke Cage series (1st season only, thus far). I will be watching Luke in Defenders AND in the remaining seasons of the series.
This post was edited on 9/3/19 at 8:35 pm
Posted by Saint Alfonzo
Member since Jan 2019
30112 posts
Posted on 9/3/19 at 8:28 pm to
quote:

See,there YOU go again, claiming I said something that I did not remotely say.


quote:

The simple facts are that those films were directed primarily toward a Black audience AND that they did well with that audience.


Are those not your words?

quote:

Your comment is indicative of PC culture. You are afraid to explore the simple question of whether a film falls into a defined genre, SIMPLY because that genre is race-related. Would you express the same reticence about a discussion of whether Sword of Shanarra is more SciFi (post-Apoxolypse) or “Fantasy?” Of course not. Is Black Panther a Blaxploitation film? I am not afraid to conduct that analysis, and it is sad that you ARE. The features an idealized Black society, depicts Black technology as superior to White technology, and portrays “Whitey” as an evil enemy (in the eyes of some characters, at a minimum).


My comments have nothing to do with PC culture or Sword of Shannara, stay on topic. Name a blaxploitation film where black technology is superior or black society is idealized.
This post was edited on 9/3/19 at 8:32 pm
Posted by AggieHank86
Texas
Member since Sep 2013
44345 posts
Posted on 9/3/19 at 8:32 pm to
quote:

quote:

Are these not your words?
The simple facts are that those films were directed primarily toward a Black audience AND that they did well with that audience.
Of course, I wrote those words about Blaxploitation films of the 1970s. There is NOTHING controversial about that description.

Your misrepresentation was with regard to the language that I BOLDFACED for you in YOUR post, you dullard.
first pageprev pagePage 2 of 3Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram