Started By
Message
locked post

Louisville, KY orders residents to wear ankle monitors.

Posted on 4/6/20 at 11:44 am
Posted by Jjdoc
Cali
Member since Mar 2016
53475 posts
Posted on 4/6/20 at 11:44 am
quote:



A judge in Kentucky is ordering people who refuse to stay at home after coming in contact with coronavirus patients to wear ankle monitors.

The severe measures are being taken in Jefferson County, which is home to Louisville, according to CNN affiliate WDRB.

In one instance, a person identified as D.L., a resident of Louisville, was living with "someone who has tested positive for the illness and another person who is a presumptive case," according to an affidavit. D.L. was ordered to isolate but “leaves the house often,” family members said.

Jefferson Circuit Court Judge Angela Bisig ordered the Department of Corrections to fit D.L. with an ankle monitor.

There are at least three other cases of people in Louisville breaking self-isolation orders in the area who were subsequently fit for ankle monitors.

States have cracked down on self-isolation recently, including in New York, where Gov. Andrew Cuomo called on the New York Police Department to be “more aggressive” and in Pennsylvania, where a woman was pulled over and fined for taking a leisurely drive alone.





LINK


Posted by ReauxlTide222
St. Petersburg
Member since Nov 2010
83483 posts
Posted on 4/6/20 at 11:45 am to
I believe New York just raised their fines to $1000
Posted by dewster
Chicago
Member since Aug 2006
25378 posts
Posted on 4/6/20 at 11:45 am to
Seems like a major violation of the law.
Posted by brett408
Member since Jan 2005
2426 posts
Posted on 4/6/20 at 11:45 am to
Well, that is a little unconstitutional
Posted by SSpaniel
Germantown
Member since Feb 2013
29658 posts
Posted on 4/6/20 at 11:45 am to
quote:

in Pennsylvania, where a woman was pulled over and fined for taking a leisurely drive alone.


What the hell? Have people absolutely lost their friggin' minds?
Posted by SSpaniel
Germantown
Member since Feb 2013
29658 posts
Posted on 4/6/20 at 11:46 am to
quote:

Seems like a major violation of the law.




What's the fine for cutting off your ankle monitor?
Posted by NoHoTiger
So many to kill, so little time
Member since Nov 2006
45739 posts
Posted on 4/6/20 at 11:46 am to
the next one of these frickers who refers to the President as "literally Hitler" needs to be reminded of who is requiring people to "show their papers." Out here Mayor Garcetti is asking people to report those who aren't following the stay-at-home orders.

I can't wait to get out of this fricking cesspool.
Posted by Wtodd
Tampa, FL
Member since Oct 2013
67493 posts
Posted on 4/6/20 at 11:47 am to
You can't fix stupid but you can fine it
Posted by AggieHank86
Texas
Member since Sep 2013
42941 posts
Posted on 4/6/20 at 11:48 am to


This post was edited on 4/6/20 at 11:49 am
Posted by SSpaniel
Germantown
Member since Feb 2013
29658 posts
Posted on 4/6/20 at 11:50 am to
quote:

Out here Mayor Garcetti is asking people to report those who aren't following the stay-at-home orders.


Same thing in Memphis. On the news every night... call blah blah blah if you know of anyone or any business you feel is violating the safer at home order.
Posted by the808bass
The Lou
Member since Oct 2012
111554 posts
Posted on 4/6/20 at 11:51 am to
This is an appropriate usage of a quarantine. He’s been exposed and we know it. He has to sit his arse at home for the duration of the quarantine. This is in contrast to population-wide, stay-at-home orders.
Posted by wileyjones
Member since May 2014
2310 posts
Posted on 4/6/20 at 11:57 am to
Posted by GeauxFightingTigers1
Member since Oct 2016
12574 posts
Posted on 4/6/20 at 12:02 pm to
I don't necessarily see anything Unconstitutional about it, generally speaking, however, it does appear that the person is not being treated the same as the medical staffs that are exposed to it. To me these orders would probably be ruled unconstitutional (or enforced unconstitutionally) on those grounds, meaning not being uniform and singling particular people out.

Furthermore, if the person never had an opportunity to contest the administrative order that should be attacking first as how can the court review an order which has not been adjudicated?

The problem is... these aren't quarantines. As far as I am concern, if someone wants to quarantine me... they need to take me to a State facility and start footing the bill.

This post was edited on 4/6/20 at 12:05 pm
Posted by Homesick Tiger
Greenbrier, AR
Member since Nov 2006
54215 posts
Posted on 4/6/20 at 12:05 pm to
quote:

self-isolation orders


If people are being arrested then the article should say government mandated isolation.
Posted by GeauxFightingTigers1
Member since Oct 2016
12574 posts
Posted on 4/6/20 at 12:06 pm to
quote:

If people are being arrested then the article should say government mandated isolation.


They want their cake and eat it too.
Posted by YouAre8Up
in a house
Member since Mar 2011
12792 posts
Posted on 4/6/20 at 12:06 pm to
quote:

Well, that is a little unconstitutional


So is tracking everyone through their phones. but it's happening now.
Posted by Ag Zwin
Member since Mar 2016
20005 posts
Posted on 4/6/20 at 12:07 pm to
Posted by Ace Midnight
Between sanity and madness
Member since Dec 2006
89569 posts
Posted on 4/6/20 at 12:07 pm to
Rhymes with "hunconstitutional", I would think.
Posted by Ace Midnight
Between sanity and madness
Member since Dec 2006
89569 posts
Posted on 4/6/20 at 12:08 pm to
quote:

So is tracking everyone through their phones.


I have no idea where my phone is, fully 60% of the time.

Now, I don't go anywhere, so I'm easy to track, anyway, but still.
Posted by GeauxFightingTigers1
Member since Oct 2016
12574 posts
Posted on 4/6/20 at 12:11 pm to
quote:

Rhymes with "hunconstitutional", I would think.


Quarantines in themselves are generally not unconstitutional, although they could potential be depending on the details.

The problem I could see there is they are not enforcing the policies uniform. If they were using this to protect the public, than there is leeway to put people in quarantine. The issue here to me is if that is the case, all the hospitals and their medical staff would be in strict quarantine, and not allowed to leave the hospital. The problem I see is potentially no due process to challenge the underlying administrative order or lack of one, but that is something they need to attack via civil process.

Of course, I probably wouldn't be giving government officials too much information to where I would be put in quarantine anyway.

I'm not sure what "self-quarantine" is, either someone has issued a quarantine order or they haven't... they should be giving you a place to stay and food as well.

This post was edited on 4/6/20 at 12:17 pm
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 2Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram