- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Louisiana Gov. Jeff Landry bans teaching of critical race theory in schools
Posted on 9/3/24 at 10:24 am to the808bass
Posted on 9/3/24 at 10:24 am to the808bass
Just because certain concepts from CRT might influence discussions about diversity and equity doesn’t mean CRT itself is being taught in schools. It’s like teaching kids about their constitutional rights, they learn about free speech and the right to bear arms, but that doesn’t mean they’re being taught advanced constitutional law. Similarly, teaching students about racism and equity helps them understand the world around them, but it’s not the same as teaching them CRT. Let’s not confuse the broader education with the specific academic theory.
Posted on 9/3/24 at 10:25 am to rwestmore7
You an hour ago
Me: Crenshaw, perhaps the leading ambassador of CRT and intersectionality in its recent mainstream moment, tells allies like yourself that minimizing CRT's role is useless and does a disservice to the push for equity.
You, now:
What happened to equity? Can someone check on equity?
quote:
That’s not what’s happening in K-12 schools, where the focus is on broader discussions about diversity, equity, and history.
Me: Crenshaw, perhaps the leading ambassador of CRT and intersectionality in its recent mainstream moment, tells allies like yourself that minimizing CRT's role is useless and does a disservice to the push for equity.
You, now:
quote:
but that’s not what’s being directly taught in K-12 classrooms. The fact that you have to reach for academic discussions about CRT just shows how far removed it is from basic education about diversity and history.
What happened to equity? Can someone check on equity?
Posted on 9/3/24 at 10:26 am to rwestmore7
quote:
Just because certain concepts from CRT might influence discussions about diversity and equity doesn’t mean CRT itself is being taught in schools.
It’s an outgrowth of critical studies. Go sell your dumb shite where people don’t know what you’re talking about. We’re full up here.
Posted on 9/3/24 at 10:27 am to rwestmore7
quote:You’re free to teach your kids about white guilt and make them cucks like you, just leave our kids out of it.
At the end of the day, in my opinion teaching kids about the realities of racism and its lasting impacts isn’t some secret plot to push CRT, it’s about giving them a complete education so we can do better as a society. If that makes you uncomfortable, maybe it’s worth asking why.
Posted on 9/3/24 at 10:27 am to the808bass
It’s clear you’re misunderstanding the difference between teaching history and helping students understand its ongoing impact. Recognizing the effects of systemic racism isn’t about pushing a theory, it’s about acknowledging how historical events continue to shape our society today. Dismissing it as just a theory ignores the reality that these issues are still affecting people’s lives. If you think understanding history’s full impact is "retarded" maybe it’s time to rethink who’s actually failing to grasp the bigger picture.
Posted on 9/3/24 at 10:30 am to rwestmore7
quote:
Luckily for you, I'm a white male and not a teacher, so your theory doesn't pan out
So you’re a limp wrist pussy, who lacks testosterone. I bet you don't have children and if you did, your such a weak man that you let your wife run all over you. How many white kids do you want to degrade daily so you get your pound of flesh?
Posted on 9/3/24 at 10:30 am to Bourre
Aw the projection is so strong with you.
Posted on 9/3/24 at 10:31 am to 4cubbies
Louisiana is always between 47-50 in public school education rank. It's because of CRT and I am proud that Gov Landry is finally going to do something about the public education crisis here in Louisiana....
I also have some ocean front property in Arizona I want to sell of at a cheap discount.
I also have some ocean front property in Arizona I want to sell of at a cheap discount.
Posted on 9/3/24 at 10:32 am to Bourre
quote:
your
you're (it's a contraction for you are)
You should really learn spelling and grammar before you try to tell us how to educate our kids...
Posted on 9/3/24 at 10:32 am to rwestmore7
quote:
Just because certain concepts from CRT might influence discussions about diversity and equity doesn’t mean CRT itself is being taught in schools. It’s like teaching kids about their constitutional rights, they learn about free speech and the right to bear arms, but that doesn’t mean they’re being taught advanced constitutional law. Similarly, teaching students about racism and equity helps them understand the world around them, but it’s not the same as teaching them CRT. Let’s not confuse the broader education with the specific academic theory.
Here's the thing, it's not a significantly broader academic theory. What you want to push on kids is the substantive fruit of CRT/critical pedagogy/Intersectionality, etc. These weren't some independently existing concepts and CRT just shined a new light on them. Feel free to go find me a bunch of academic papers (or curriculums) talking about diversity and equity concepts from the early 60s if you think you can
The second amendment is a thing. It is a thing that exists separately from con law studies in the academic setting and has existed as a topic through the various changes that have occurred in how constitutional law is approached throughout the history of American constitutional studies. Equity studies and what is being promoted in K-12 is not some independently derived thing that can be viewed through a CRT lens, it's a purely academic concept created out of and from the same community that brought us CRT.
Posted on 9/3/24 at 10:35 am to rwestmore7
quote:What is your definition of “equity?”
Similarly, teaching students about racism and equity helps them understand the world around them,
My definition is equal outcome. That is impossible and should never be taught in schools.
quote:
Equity recognizes that each person has different circumstances and allocates the exact resources and opportunities needed to reach an equal outcome.
This post was edited on 9/3/24 at 10:38 am
Posted on 9/3/24 at 10:36 am to rwestmore7
quote:
Recognizing the effects of systemic racism isn’t about pushing a theory, it’s about acknowledging how historical events continue to shape our society today. Dismissing it as just a theory ignores the reality that these issues are still affecting people’s lives.
"it's about acknowledging"
"ignores the reality"
But guys, it's not about pushing.
Posted on 9/3/24 at 10:37 am to Pettifogger
Well, it’s no surprise that you won’t find a lot of academic papers or curricula from the 60s talking about equity and diversity, the country was still busy fighting over whether minorities should even have basic rights. It’s kind of hard to teach about equity when entire populations were still being majorly oppressed. Maybe the reason these concepts weren’t in the classroom is because they were too busy being ignored in society. Thankfully, we’ve made some progress since then, and now it’s about time we address the gaps they left behind.
Posted on 9/3/24 at 10:39 am to bhtigerfan
Equity isn’t about guaranteeing equal outcomes for everyone, it’s about recognizing that people start from different places and may need different resources to have a fair shot at success. It’s not about making everyone the same, but about leveling the playing field so everyone has a chance to achieve their potential.
Teaching about equity in schools isn’t about pushing for some utopian idea of equal outcomes. It’s about helping students understand that fairness sometimes means giving more support to those who need it so that everyone has a real opportunity to succeed. It’s crucial for understanding how we create a society that values and supports all of its members, not just those who already have advantages.
Teaching about equity in schools isn’t about pushing for some utopian idea of equal outcomes. It’s about helping students understand that fairness sometimes means giving more support to those who need it so that everyone has a real opportunity to succeed. It’s crucial for understanding how we create a society that values and supports all of its members, not just those who already have advantages.
Posted on 9/3/24 at 10:40 am to rwestmore7
quote:
Well, it’s no surprise that you won’t find a lot of academic papers or curricula from the 60s talking about equity and diversity, the country was still busy fighting over whether minorities should even have basic rights. It’s kind of hard to teach about equity when entire populations were still being majorly oppressed. Maybe the reason these concepts weren’t in the classroom is because they were too busy being ignored in society. Thankfully, we’ve made some progress since then, and now it’s about time we address the gaps they left behind.
Correct, it's not a surprise. You could find plenty of academic discussion about any number of racial topics during the civil rights era, but not many about equity, because it's an academic concept created by radicals with an acknowledged marxist background.
What field are you in that you've been eaten up with this stuff (without actually having read the source material) if not K-12 teaching? I assume if you were in academia you'd have read it. College student? Human Resources?
Posted on 9/3/24 at 10:41 am to rwestmore7
quote:This is impossible and will never happen.
Equity recognizes that each person has different circumstances and allocates the exact resources and opportunities needed to reach an equal outcome.
Equality is possible and we strive for that constantly. Equity is not possible unless you oppress the majority of people.
Posted on 9/3/24 at 10:44 am to rwestmore7
quote:
Equity isn’t about guaranteeing equal outcomes for everyone, it’s about recognizing that people start from different places and may need different resources to have a fair shot at success. It’s not about making everyone the same, but about leveling the playing field so everyone has a chance to achieve their potential.
So we'd agree that well-funded minority-majority public schools that receive more money and resources than better-performing mostly white counterparts but are failing by most metrics are nonetheless equitable?
Because we don't gauge equity on outputs but on the inputs, based on your assertion - right?
Posted on 9/3/24 at 10:44 am to rwestmore7
quote:
Aw the projection is so strong with you.
Nah, I’m not looking to blame white children for all of the world’s ills like you and your communist ilk. You want to call children oppressors so that your ego feels better. Yet you will completely ignore other races and cultures who practiced slavery, including slavery that’s being committed today, since it doesn’t fit your narrative.
Posted on 9/3/24 at 10:44 am to rwestmore7
quote:
It’s clear you’re misunderstanding the difference between teaching history and helping students understand its ongoing impact.
I understand that teaching a flawed Marxist theory as fact disguised as history is bullshite.
Popular
Back to top


3




