Started By
Message

re: Louisiana Election- All Four Amendments Fail

Posted on 3/30/25 at 9:39 am to
Posted by loogaroo
Welsh
Member since Dec 2005
39772 posts
Posted on 3/30/25 at 9:39 am to
quote:

My biggest issue with #2 was the idea that money was going to be less restricted in BR. They don’t deserve the benefit of the doubt IMO.


Agree . At least not yet.
Posted by slackster
Houston
Member since Mar 2009
91362 posts
Posted on 3/30/25 at 9:40 am to
quote:

didn’t see all that; I don’t use social media very much. What were the teachers saying was bad about #2?


Some liked the raise/debt pay down, but others were weary of losing the projects supported by the $2B in the constitutionally protected funds.
Posted by TigerintheNO
New Orleans
Member since Jan 2004
44205 posts
Posted on 3/30/25 at 9:58 am to
No one trust Landry, hope he faces a Republican challenger. If not I'm not sure he would beat Edwards.
Posted by Gdellinger
Member since Dec 2024
686 posts
Posted on 3/30/25 at 10:07 am to
Sorry but my church said don't vote for amendment 2 and I believe my church over these snake oil salesmen that moonlight as politicians
Posted by Bard
Definitely NOT an admin
Member since Oct 2008
57978 posts
Posted on 3/30/25 at 10:07 am to
quote:

That’s not how I read #1. I didn’t think there would be more courts overall, but potentially better acumen presiding over the specialized courts.


From the PAR Guide:

quote:

The second part of the amendment would broaden state lawmakers’ authority to create specialty courts, removing the jurisdiction limit to specific parishes or judicial districts. The Louisiana Legislature would be able to set up new trial courts of specialized jurisdiction that could be statewide or regional with a two-thirds vote of the House and Senate.


From the Sec's office

quote:

Proposing to amend Article V, Sections 5(B), 15(A), and 16(A) of the Constitution of Louisiana, relative to jurisdiction of courts; to provide for disciplinary proceedings over attorneys from other jurisdictions concerning legal services in the state and over related unethical practices; to authorize creation of courts of limited or specialized jurisdiction; and to specify an election for submission of the proposition to electors and provide a ballot proposition.


You're a smart guy. That we both read this differently, to me, underscores either how poorly these amendments can be written or how they are purposely written so in order to obfuscate attempts to sneak in growth of state government.
Posted by High C
viewing the fall....
Member since Nov 2012
59483 posts
Posted on 3/30/25 at 10:12 am to
Black people on my Facebook feed are actually bragging about the amendments being defeated. Talking about how this is what happens when WE show up and stand on business, and that 2026 is going to be THEIR year. Never underestimate how much the vast majority of these people quietly hate you if you’re white.
Posted by Gee Grenouille
Bogalusa
Member since Jul 2018
7579 posts
Posted on 3/30/25 at 10:44 am to
quote:

Maybe they should make the amendments about only one thing


They tried that with the inventory property tax elimination several years ago and it failed miserably. The grifters tied it to a teachers pay raise in amendment 2.
Posted by Lickitty Split
Inside
Member since Apr 2017
4120 posts
Posted on 3/30/25 at 11:10 am to
It looks like the people don’t want to raise teacher pay or give seniors a tax break. I guess this makes it easier on the legislature next tine teachers ask for their raise or stipend. Sorry, we put that to a vote and the people shot it down nearly 2-1. If you want a raise, go ask your local school board who encouraged you to vote against your interests.

Seniors, you need help because your cost of living has gone up due to Biden’s inflation, go ask your local government to help you out. The state spoke and you voted against your interest.

Oh you are complaining because some kid dud some bad shite at 17 but we couldn’t put him away for longer because the idiots voted it down. Blame the people who voted.

Oh you don’t like appointed judges making the decisions, we could have an ejected judge but the people voted that down. Sorry!

Your business pays inventory tax and you may not be able to make ends meet this year. Blame the people who didn’t want to get rid of this stupid costly tax.

This might be the best thing that ever happened to the legislature. They have cover to say no to most special interests and overly inflated groups asking for change.

Way to screw yourself Louisiana
Posted by Riverside
Member since Jul 2022
8525 posts
Posted on 3/30/25 at 11:10 am to
It’s a major red flag for Landry. The people don’t like his agenda. It’s also a sign of apathy on the Republican side since last November. Our side isn’t motivated and that’s an even bigger problem.

Landry needs to go back to the drawing board and abolish the income tax and get behind major tort reform. He does those 2 things and he’ll win re-election in a landslide.
Posted by RougeDawg
Member since Jul 2016
7332 posts
Posted on 3/30/25 at 11:31 am to
quote:

people don’t want to raise teacher pay


I believe most teachers were against CA2 because it would take from the retirement fund.
Posted by theballguy
Member since Oct 2011
31649 posts
Posted on 3/30/25 at 11:34 am to
quote:

people in general do not trust slimy cocksucking politicians no matter their party affiliation


Posted by RougeDawg
Member since Jul 2016
7332 posts
Posted on 3/30/25 at 11:42 am to
quote:

No one trust Landry


I was o.k. with him until he tried to pull a Huey Long and take over DOTD with a last minute sketchy request to Civil Service. That was very crooked.
Posted by BigJim
Baton Rouge
Member since Jan 2010
14982 posts
Posted on 3/30/25 at 11:47 am to
quote:



I believe most teachers were against CA2 because it would take from the retirement fund.



Again, it added $2 billion to the retirement fund.
Posted by crewdepoo
Hogwarts
Member since Jan 2015
10897 posts
Posted on 3/30/25 at 11:55 am to
quote:

This may be the stupidest comment I've ever read on here.
this is what Landry said. He said if the amendment didn't pass he would get rid of the existing pay raise.
Posted by broadhead
Member since Oct 2014
2487 posts
Posted on 3/30/25 at 11:57 am to
Any time there is an election for so few things I assume they hope to pass it with low voter turnout. For me that raises a red flag. I'd like to find out how much tax money was used putting this out to vote.

I'm not voting yes for anything until it is to abolish the state income tax. And if that doesn't happen soon then it is time to move to a friendlier state.
Posted by KamaCausey_LSU
Member since Apr 2013
17184 posts
Posted on 3/30/25 at 12:01 pm to
quote:

MS eliminated the income tax this week

No they didn't. They lowered it to 3%. And said they might lower it in the future if the budget allows.
Posted by elprez00
Hammond, LA
Member since Sep 2011
31336 posts
Posted on 3/30/25 at 12:06 pm to
Oh please. We spend more per student in state funds than both Florida and Texas. Money is not solving the problem.

We have the highest effective tax rate in the country. And still have income tax. Where’s all that money going?

Landry is right. We are a state that’s accustomed to failing. And he’s just as big a part of the problem.

We elect stupid politicians that don’t give a shite about the state. We listen to teachers whine about how underpaid and ill equipped they are yet we are one of the worst education systems in the country. We feel bad about not passing extra funding for police yet we have one of the highest crime rates in the country.

Where’s the accountability? Look in the mirror.
Posted by hashtag
Comfy, AF
Member since Aug 2005
32741 posts
Posted on 3/30/25 at 12:18 pm to
quote:


It’s a major red flag for Landry. The people don’t like his agenda. It’s also a sign of apathy on the Republican side since last November. Our side isn’t motivated and that’s an even bigger problem
none of that is true. These all failed because they crammed 5+ things into Amendment 2 and made a huge push to get it passed, despite no one being able to articulate specifically to the voters why they should vote on it.

If they broke Amendment 2 into separate parts, I have zero doubts some of them would've passed.
Posted by Drew1964
Member since Nov 2024
252 posts
Posted on 3/30/25 at 12:22 pm to
You folks need to be real careful who you vote for next election. We have the highest auto ins. In the country and nothing is getting done to lower homeowners ins. The ambulance chasers have to be shut down in order to get ins. rates lower. Laundry took campaign money from all of them. He was try to sneak other pork in amendment 2 . Read the last 3 words.
Posted by TigerAllNightLong
Member since Jul 2023
1000 posts
Posted on 3/30/25 at 12:45 pm to
quote:

and get behind major tort reform

LOL - why would Jeff get behind tort reform when he prides himself on preventing tort reform?
first pageprev pagePage 6 of 7Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram