- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
2
Posted on 8/26/20 at 3:47 pm to NIH
quote:
Hank, what’s your client base looking like these days?
You think a lawyer that can only ever offer hypotheticals to defend his positions has any worthwhile clients? This moron has public defender written all over him
Posted on 8/26/20 at 3:47 pm to AggieHank86
The prosecutor won’t go to trial.
The purpose of the arrest is simply to try and prevent other law and order citizens from defending themselves from leftist terrorist groups like BLM.
But it’s too late. The pendulum has already started swinging the other way.
The purpose of the arrest is simply to try and prevent other law and order citizens from defending themselves from leftist terrorist groups like BLM.
But it’s too late. The pendulum has already started swinging the other way.
Posted on 8/26/20 at 3:51 pm to AggieHank86
quote:
It seems to vary, ranging from "attempting to disengage" to "completely disengaging."
From the video I saw, it looks like he completely disengaged until he was run down.
Posted on 8/26/20 at 3:52 pm to AggieHank86
quote:
I anticipate 10:1 downvotes for even asking the question
Hank taking one for the team...
Posted on 8/26/20 at 3:55 pm to AggieHank86
You’re retired?
Posted on 8/26/20 at 3:58 pm to NIH
quote:mostly. Couple of years now. Loving it ... except on REALLY hot days.
You’re retired?
Posted on 8/26/20 at 4:01 pm to AggieHank86
12.8:1 now.
Posted on 8/26/20 at 4:02 pm to AggieHank86
quote:
young Rittenhouse
You always come across as small and insecure, and it’s because of backhanded jabs like this.
Just man up
And actually say what you think, instead of hiding behind slights like this.
Posted on 8/26/20 at 4:04 pm to AggieHank86
quote:
Most posters here just want a pep rally, where everyone is wearing the same team jersey and chanting the same slogans. A handful like to engage in actual analysis. This thread was directed to the latter group.
No, I would have no problem admitting that the kid was wrong if he were.
any reasonable person can see from the video that he was being attached. Kicked in the head, skateboard to the head. HE HAS THE RIGHT TO DEFEND HIMSELF.
Posted on 8/26/20 at 4:04 pm to Lima Whiskey
quote:
You always come across as small and insecure, and it’s because of backhanded jabs like this.
Just man up
And actually say what you think, instead of hiding behind slights like this.
C'mon man. It's obvious Hank is an older dude, there is nothing backhanded about calling him "young Rittenhouse".
Ugh...you made me defend Hank the Aggie.
Posted on 8/26/20 at 4:19 pm to AggieHank86
quote:Again, KR was only in the car lot because Mr.ShootMeN**ga! chased him there while trying to set the kid on fire. I don't think the kid was defending the lot at all. LINK
Slightly different question, because ownership governs whether he had the RIGHT to use "deadly force" (whether actual or "implied") in defending the property.
If he owned the property, he would arguably be justified in pointing the weapon and saying "stay away from this car lot." If he did NOT own the car lot, the argument that he had a such a legal justification is MUCH weaker.
Posted on 8/26/20 at 4:23 pm to AggieHank86
My problem with your argument: he didn’t shoot anyone in defense of property. In fact, he was in full retreat away from the property and was being chased by the mob. At that point, it’s self defense from bodily harm; the property angle seems irrelevant here.
Posted on 8/26/20 at 4:29 pm to jrodLSUke
quote:AS to the confrontation in the street (involving kung-fu guy, skateboard guy and amputated arm guy), you are 100% correct.
My problem with your argument: he didn’t shoot anyone in defense of property. In fact, he was in full retreat away from the property and was being chased by the mob. At that point, it’s self defense from bodily harm; the property angle seems irrelevant here.
As to the earlier confrontation in the car lot (involving Molotov guy), the answer is not yet nearly so clear.
Posted on 8/26/20 at 4:31 pm to AggieHank86
Thanks, Hank. Now I want a steak. 
Posted on 8/26/20 at 4:32 pm to jrodLSUke
quote:Correct.
My problem with your argument: he didn’t shoot anyone in defense of property. In fact, he was in full retreat away from the property and was being chased by the mob. At that point, it’s self defense from bodily harm; the property angle seems irrelevant here.
It's nearly inconceivable that a punk-thug would attempt to chase down, ignite, and attack someone armed with a rifle. He was betting the kid would cower from shooting, then he and his buds would beat Rittenhouse to a pulp. He miscalculated badly.
It is hard for Hank, or anyone, to believe that's the way things went down . . . until they see the video and realize that actually is the way things went down.
This post was edited on 8/26/20 at 4:33 pm
Posted on 8/26/20 at 4:33 pm to AggieHank86
https://twitter.com/RichieMcGinniss/status/1298657958205820928
this video shows the kid talking about being there to protect a business, his MEDIC BAG to help people and the gun to protect himself bc he's running into harms way.
so what kind of BS are you going to spin from this now??
Kid was RUNNING AWAY from them. He was protecting himself. If he wouldn't of had that gun more would have jumped on him.
GFY Hank
this video shows the kid talking about being there to protect a business, his MEDIC BAG to help people and the gun to protect himself bc he's running into harms way.
so what kind of BS are you going to spin from this now??
Kid was RUNNING AWAY from them. He was protecting himself. If he wouldn't of had that gun more would have jumped on him.
GFY Hank
This post was edited on 8/26/20 at 4:44 pm
Posted on 8/26/20 at 4:33 pm to AggieHank86
He should not have been armed at 17.
He had every right under the law to use deadly force if he had a reasonable fear for his life.
The question about protecting property is almost seperate unless you can prove he shot someone in order to prevent a property crime from occuring. My understanding is they tried to attack him personally. This will be a question of self defense.
He had every right under the law to use deadly force if he had a reasonable fear for his life.
The question about protecting property is almost seperate unless you can prove he shot someone in order to prevent a property crime from occuring. My understanding is they tried to attack him personally. This will be a question of self defense.
Posted on 8/26/20 at 4:36 pm to AggieHank86
quote:Hank I know you are juggling a bunch of balls here,but for the third time KR was only in the car lot because Mr.ShootMeN**ga! chased him there while trying to set the kid on fire. I don't think the kid was defending the lot at all.
As to the earlier confrontation in the car lot (involving Molotov guy), the answer is not yet nearly so clear.
YOU NEED TO CLICK THIS LINK
Posted on 8/26/20 at 4:41 pm to NC_Tigah
quote:Thanks. I've not seen that particular video. We can see Rittenhouse running across the front part of the car lot, but I cannot see WHERE he came FROM ... the left part of the lot OR off premises.
NC_Tigah
Again, I have seen representations that he had some direct relationship with this location. Maybe not. Still a lot of facts to be developed.
Page 7 of 13
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News