- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Looking at young Rittenhouse from another Angle
Posted on 8/26/20 at 5:16 pm to OnwardToMAyhem
Posted on 8/26/20 at 5:16 pm to OnwardToMAyhem
quote:
This is not my area of expertise,
"I have zero basis for the following statements..."
1
Posted on 8/26/20 at 5:18 pm to OnwardToMAyhem
What law did he break?
Posted on 8/26/20 at 5:20 pm to AggieHank86
Seems pretty easy to prove, even “legally speaking”.
Posted on 8/26/20 at 5:22 pm to AggieHank86
quote:
Where do you see this "right?"
The right to "life"
You just gotta look it up....
(Pass me the ramen please)
Posted on 8/26/20 at 5:23 pm to pankReb
quote:Not exactly. That only applies during target shooting or weapons training:
Pretty sure the law states he can carry as a 17 year old as long as he’s under adult supervision
quote:Unless popping protesters counts as target practice, I don't think this provision helps him much, even if the folks WERE there.
This section does not apply to a person under 18 years of age who possesses or is armed with a dangerous weapon when the dangerous weapon is being used in target practice under the supervision of an adult or in a course of instruction in the traditional and proper use of the dangerous weapon under the supervision of an adult.
Posted on 8/26/20 at 5:25 pm to AggieHank86
quote:
Reading it the latter way, I now understand your point.
My broader point is that there are many, many lawful, benign uses of a rifle including lawful self-defense. Obviously folks can do what they want on their own property, but having a Molotov cocktail out in public - you're a revolutionary, a terrorist, an arsonist or all three.
Period.
This post was edited on 8/26/20 at 5:26 pm
Posted on 8/26/20 at 5:28 pm to AggieHank86
Gotcha.
But then why isn’t he being charged for that?
But then why isn’t he being charged for that?
Posted on 8/26/20 at 5:32 pm to subotic
quote:
"I have zero basis for the following statements..."
Incorrect, except unlike most everyone else who posts here 200 times a day on every topic under the conservative sun and claims utter infallibilty, even though I know an awful lot about this,I am fair in judging my knowledge.
I promise I know more than most posting here on this. I'd bet a large sum of money I know more than you.
Like it or not, he was breaking the law when this occurred, opinion is not a factor here, facts are.
I have little invested in this, I think all sides were idiots.
Posted on 8/26/20 at 5:32 pm to pankReb
"'The rifle was being jerked around in all directions while it was being fired,' Rosas said."
Rosas was a witness in the UK Daily Mail article. It details circumstances surrounding at least one shooting - Skateboard guy..
Rosas was a witness in the UK Daily Mail article. It details circumstances surrounding at least one shooting - Skateboard guy..
Posted on 8/26/20 at 5:34 pm to pankReb
quote:Unknown.
But then why isn’t he being charged for that?
In many jurisdictions, misdemeanors and felonies are handled in different courts and by different prosecutors. My guess is that this is the reason.
Posted on 8/26/20 at 5:36 pm to OnwardToMAyhem
quote:
Incorrect, except unlike most everyone else who posts here 200 times a day on every topic under the conservative sun and claims utter infallibilty, even though I know an awful lot about this,I am fair in judging my knowledge.
I promise I know more than most posting here on this. I'd bet a large sum of money I know more than you.
But you are the one claiming that a minor misdemeanor gun charge will "effect" his self-defense claims. On what basis do you make that claim?
Posted on 8/26/20 at 5:36 pm to Turbeauxdog
quote:Only claims the superiority after he checks Wikipedia.
then claims intellectual superiority when laughed at.
Posted on 8/26/20 at 5:40 pm to AggieHank86
quote:Right.
Thanks. I've not seen that particular video. We can see Rittenhouse running across the front part of the car lot, but I cannot see WHERE he came FROM ... the left part of the lot OR off premises.
Again, I have seen representations that he had some direct relationship with this location. Maybe not. Still a lot of facts to be developed.
He had no relationship to any Kenosha enterprise. Zero.
He is a 17-y/o kid with law-enforcement career aspirations from a town 30 miles away who lives in a small Apt with his mom.
There is no way in Hell that he had some direct (or indirect) relationship with this location.
Posted on 8/26/20 at 5:42 pm to AggieHank86
quote:Dude!
Unless popping protesters counts as target practice
Come on!
Are you trying to Nick Sandmann this KID too?
Posted on 8/26/20 at 5:43 pm to NC_Tigah
quote:I saw a video earlier today in which he was standing in front of a boarded-up building and saying that he was present to defend that specific building. It is the same video in which he showed his medkit. Another poster earlier today said it was the same building.
NC_Tigah
There is no way in Hell that he had some direct (or indirect) relationship with this location
This post was edited on 8/26/20 at 5:47 pm
Posted on 8/26/20 at 5:45 pm to NC_Tigah
quote:Lighten up. It was a joke ... and I thought a rather obvious one.quote:Dude! Come on! Are you trying to Nick Sandmann this KID too?
Unless popping protesters counts as target practice
Posted on 8/26/20 at 5:45 pm to AggieHank86
quote:
protesters
Posted on 8/26/20 at 5:46 pm to AggieHank86
This is false - you can protect others as well. Try again, dumbass.
Posted on 8/26/20 at 5:46 pm to AggieHank86
He's from IL. Nice that there are two less low life scum on the planet, but the kid travelled across state lines. He will serve time.
Posted on 8/26/20 at 5:49 pm to RoaringTiger33
quote:I started a thread about a question related directly to the protection of property ... your own versus that of others.
This is false - you can protect others as well. Try again, dumbass.
And you throw a fit because it did not also address the unrelated (and inapposite) question of "protection of others?"
OK, Billy Baddass.
Page 9 of 13
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News