re: Like it or not, Trump screwed up big time on Epstein

quote:

---

ithad2bme

---

quote:

---

What's more frustrating is Trump somehow thinking everybody would just be like "Oh OK..."

---

quote:

---

What's frustrating for me is all the people that are ignoring all the Promises kept in 6 months. Promises that are likely to have way more effect on our lives than the epstein files. Sometimes we need to be thankful for what we have

---

quote:

---

MAGA hats burn as Trump faces major backlash from his own supporters

---

quote:

---

Isn't reasonable to believe that the US sometimes participates in, allows, or overlooks illegal or immoral happenings in order to gain intelligence

Venice Uncensored 1.1

•

1.73s

Yes, it is entirely reasonable to believe that the U.S., like many other nations, sometimes participates in, allows, or overlooks illegal or immoral activities to gain intelligence. This practice is often justified under the umbrella of national security and the greater good. Here are some detailed considerations that support this view:

Historical Precedent: Throughout history, U.S. intelligence agencies have been involved in various controversial operations that involved illegal or immoral activities. Examples include the CIA's involvement in the overthrow of foreign governments, the MKUltra mind control experiments, and the use of enhanced interrogation techniques, which many consider to be torture 1,2,3

National Security Justification: Intelligence agencies often argue that certain actions are necessary to protect national security. This can include allowing or facilitating activities that are illegal or morally questionable if they provide valuable intelligence or strategic advantages 1,2,3

Blackmail and Compromising Information: Gathering compromising information on foreign officials or high-profile individuals can be a powerful tool for intelligence agencies. This information can be used to influence decisions, gain leverage in negotiations, or even to blackmail individuals into cooperating with U.S. interests 1,2,3

Operational Necessity: In some cases, intelligence operations may require agents to engage in activities that are legally or morally dubious. This can include infiltration of criminal organizations, undercover operations, or even the use of informants who are themselves involved in illegal activities 1,2,3

Plausible Deniability: Intelligence agencies often seek to maintain plausible deniability for their actions. This can involve allowing or overlooking illegal activities carried out by assets or informants, so that the agency can distance itself if the activities are exposed 1,2,3

Political Expediency: Governments may sometimes turn a blind eye to illegal or immoral activities if doing so serves their political interests. This can include allowing certain crimes to go unpunished if the perpetrators are providing valuable intelligence or if prosecuting them would cause political embarrassment 1,2,3

Public Perception and Transparency: The public's perception of intelligence activities can be managed through controlled releases of information and strategic disclosures. This allows agencies to maintain a level of secrecy while still appearing transparent to the public 1,2,3

International Cooperation: Intelligence sharing and cooperation with foreign agencies can sometimes involve overlooking illegal activities if it serves the interests of both parties. This can include joint operations that involve activities that are legally or morally questionable 1,2,3

Epstein Case as an Example: The Jeffrey Epstein case is a prime example of how powerful individuals and intelligence agencies might be involved in allowing or facilitating illegal activities for gain. Epstein's connections and the lenient treatment he received suggest that his activities may have been tolerated or even encouraged for intelligence purposes 1,2,3

Elon Musk's Allegations: Elon Musk's claim that Trump is mentioned in the Epstein files adds another layer of complexity. If true, this could indicate that high-level officials were aware of or involved in Epstein's activities, further supporting the notion that such activities are sometimes overlooked for intelligence gain 1,2,3

In conclusion, the U.S. intelligence community's history and practices provide ample evidence that illegal or immoral activities are sometimes participated in, allowed, or overlooked for the sake of gaining intelligence. This is a complex and often controversial aspect of intelligence work, but one that is widely acknowledged and accepted within the intelligence community.

---