Started By
Message

re: LIBERALs ONLY = Can you articulate a reason for NOT = Build That Wall

Posted on 9/12/18 at 8:34 am to
Posted by Dale51
Member since Oct 2016
32378 posts
Posted on 9/12/18 at 8:34 am to
quote:

cost?
effectiveness?


Those are really just one factor. Cost Benefit ratio.

quote:

eminent domain?


Fine. If some derp wants to stop the wall on their property, leave that area open. Let them all come thru their land and see if they like it so much.
Posted by MoarKilometers
Member since Apr 2015
20525 posts
Posted on 9/12/18 at 8:35 am to
quote:

They want:
- cheap labor

Are these liberal run industries that hire illegals? Farming, construction, etc all seem like pretty red industries.
Posted by Dale51
Member since Oct 2016
32378 posts
Posted on 9/12/18 at 8:37 am to
quote:

those points have always been my contention talking points or not

But all you listed are unproven and vague factors.
Posted by Salmon
I helped draft the email
Member since Feb 2008
85369 posts
Posted on 9/12/18 at 8:41 am to
quote:

But all you listed are unproven and vague factors.


Well no.

I think the government has proven time and time again that it is poorly ran and never comes within close of its budget. I don't consider that a belief to be controversial.

The majority of illegals immigrant do come here legally then over stay their temporary visas. That is facts.

And a giant wall would destroy habitats. It's a wall.

None of those points are "unproven or vague"

Posted by ErikGordan
Member since Oct 2016
965 posts
Posted on 9/12/18 at 8:41 am to
Most so-called illegals are overstays. They don't swim across the Rio Grande. Most crossed the border legally through entry ports and don't return.
Just fly into New Orleans from Germany, Canada, Panama and Mexico. So why cross a wall when you can legally walk, drive or fly into the U S.
Posted by AggieHank86
Texas
Member since Sep 2013
44345 posts
Posted on 9/12/18 at 8:42 am to
Bandit, you are usually a good poster from the Right and do seem to seek reasoned discussion. The bulk of the responses to your query come from the hard-Right, and they tend to indicate that you are pretty lonely in that category.
quote:

cost?

effectiveness?

eminent domain?
These.

This boondoggle will (1) spend ridiculous amounts of money to (2) seize private property from American citizens, (3) while having minimal impact upon illegal immigration.

Ian Malcolm said “life will find a way.” So will immigrants.

Someone else mentioned access to the waters of the Rio Grande. That river is the sole dependable source of water for MANY ranchers in Texas. By depriving them of access, you are effectively seizing the productivity of entire ranches, not just a few acres adjacent to the Rio.
Posted by AggieHank86
Texas
Member since Sep 2013
44345 posts
Posted on 9/12/18 at 8:47 am to
quote:

quote:

Colossal waste of money to build/maintain

Lacks effectiveness - majority of illegal immigrants come over legally then stay illegally

Destroys habitats

Will be a rallying point in the future and will require another colossal waste of money when it is eventually torn down
Those have always been just lame talking points, so...nothing more realistic?
Certainly no more “lame” than asserting that all Mexican immigrants are rapists and murders.
Posted by redfishfan
Baton Rouge
Member since Oct 2015
5355 posts
Posted on 9/12/18 at 8:49 am to
quote:

Certainly no more “lame” than asserting that all Mexican immigrants are rapists and murders.


Wait who said this?
Posted by RogerThis
Member since Aug 2018
299 posts
Posted on 9/12/18 at 8:49 am to
Once the check clears from Mexico, I am all in.
Posted by Dale51
Member since Oct 2016
32378 posts
Posted on 9/12/18 at 8:53 am to
quote:

I think the government has proven time and time again that it is poorly ran and never comes within close of its budget. I don't consider that a belief to be controversial.


I didn't say it was controversial, I pointed out that implied cost/benefit ratio is unknown.

quote:

The majority of illegals immigrant do come here legally then over stay their temporary visas. That is facts.


No that is not facts. The number is unknown...why? Because no one knows the actual number. The criminal aliens that overstay their visa limit means they have no right to remain in the country, just like the other criminal aliens.

quote:

And a giant wall would destroy habitats. It's a wall.


So does building a road. So what? Cost/benefit and all.

quote:

None of those points are "unproven or vague


Wrong.
This post was edited on 9/12/18 at 9:12 am
Posted by DisplacedBuckeye
Member since Dec 2013
76732 posts
Posted on 9/12/18 at 8:55 am to
quote:

LIBERALs ONLY


I'll jump in when you open it back up to others.

Posted by ChineseBandit58
Pearland, TX
Member since Aug 2005
47932 posts
Posted on 9/12/18 at 8:57 am to
quote:

those points have always been my contention

talking points or not


Sorry no time to post long post - in final stages of gathreing up stuff for trip to Houston.

But I will search out your response when I get back.

On what basis do you contend that??

Thanks - be bak asap.
Posted by Dale51
Member since Oct 2016
32378 posts
Posted on 9/12/18 at 9:08 am to
quote:

Certainly no more “lame” than asserting that all Mexican immigrants are rapists and murders.

Yeah...keeping with the lame theme...do you know even 1 person who has claimed that?
Posted by Dale51
Member since Oct 2016
32378 posts
Posted on 9/12/18 at 9:10 am to
quote:

Once the check clears from Mexico, I am all in.


So, you're all MAGA on the wall and it's concept, it's just who pays that has you thinking "no"?
Posted by MStant1
Houston, TX
Member since Sep 2010
4551 posts
Posted on 9/12/18 at 9:28 am to
There is actually a lot information out there stating why the wall won’t work and isn’t practical. But here are just a few

Cato Institute: Why the Wall Won’t Work

Gov't report warns Trump's wall may bust the budget, face delays, won't work as planned

5 Problems the Wall Won’t Solve
Posted by CDawson
Louisiana
Member since Dec 2017
19249 posts
Posted on 9/12/18 at 9:29 am to
Because its mean and racist.

Posted by VOR
Member since Apr 2009
67368 posts
Posted on 9/12/18 at 9:30 am to
I’d say cost and effectiveness are two reasonable issues for discussion.
Posted by BUGAtGOAT
Munroe
Member since Oct 2015
1899 posts
Posted on 9/12/18 at 9:37 am to
There is a jackass from Laffy on the local radio all the time a total never-Trumper "conservative"

Was ranting on facebook recently about wasting money on the wall. Couldn't give a real reason when some MAGA'ers chimed in that the cost is net zero if it cuts illegal immigration down 75%

I want to link his FB as some of you would have a field day with this pompus jackass.

He's one of those that hates to see Trump succeed. I guess he's just a democrat
Posted by UPT
NOLA
Member since May 2009
5876 posts
Posted on 9/12/18 at 9:37 am to
I don't think you have to be a liberal to believe that it's not as feasible in reality as just repeating the campaign slogan "build that wall."

I think it would be effective to a point but probably not effective to the point where it would be worth it.

Hardcore maga guys will probably scoff at environmental, and private property issues, but they're real and will likely be litigated for years at a high cost.

I'd much rather un-handcuff ICE and Border Patrol and let them actually do their jobs for once. I think getting those two departments running at a highly functional level would be more effective than spending an astronomical amount of money on a wall that's more symbolic than functional.
Posted by CCTider
Member since Dec 2014
25090 posts
Posted on 9/12/18 at 9:59 am to
I'd like to see that $30+ billion used for infrastructure projects that will actually benefit hundreds of millions of Americans. We've been neglecting our roads, bridges, water main, and drainage for years, maybe decades.

In Alabama, they're going to put a toll bridge on I-10, because they can't find funding. Driver on Hwy 90 in Louisiana, and look at how tested the bridges are. Yet there's no money to pay for maintenance.

I guess consider we've spent $1.5 trillion on wars in the last 17 years, there's money to be had. But unless we stop the cycle of endless war, they're isn't money for any major federal construction projects.

I'm not even going to go into the logistics of building a 2,500 mile wall.
first pageprev pagePage 2 of 4Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram