- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Lawfare wrote the whistleblower complaint
Posted on 9/26/19 at 3:52 pm to bmy
Posted on 9/26/19 at 3:52 pm to bmy
quote:
Are we pretending that he did something no other attorney could? It's nothing special.. what nefarious role could lawfare have possibly served here?
Writing up a fake complaint isnt nefarious
0
Posted on 9/26/19 at 3:53 pm to Strannix
The only way this was allowed to be made into a big deal is the IG is in on it with the lawfare alliance.
LINK
He was like the RR. Any IG not in on it, and this garbage would have never left the dept for lack of merit.
It will go no where but he gave the dems new peach mint talking points.
LINK
He was like the RR. Any IG not in on it, and this garbage would have never left the dept for lack of merit.
It will go no where but he gave the dems new peach mint talking points.
This post was edited on 9/26/19 at 3:54 pm
Posted on 9/26/19 at 3:53 pm to roadGator
quote:
Are you pretending to not understand what lawfare group is all about?
No. I'm just asking why it matters who helped write the complaint if the information in it is factual.
This post was edited on 9/26/19 at 3:54 pm
Posted on 9/26/19 at 3:54 pm to bmy
Who says it's factual? Better yet, even if you believe every word, a lot of those words are interpretation of second hand accounts.
Would you like to be tried with admissable hearsay?
Would you like to be tried with admissable hearsay?
This post was edited on 9/26/19 at 3:55 pm
Posted on 9/26/19 at 3:55 pm to Bwmdx
quote:
If you want to cut the head off this treasonous snake, then Lawfare is your target.
This is pretty fringy.
Kinda reminds me of when the G. Gordon Liddy and his plumbers kicked around the idea of firebombing the Brookings Institution and kidnapping leftists and holding them in Mexico City through the end of the DNC convention in '72.
Those baws were wack. Trump would've had a field day with Liddy.
This post was edited on 9/26/19 at 3:59 pm
Posted on 9/26/19 at 3:56 pm to bmy
Factual?
Second hand? Possibly worse.
You are smarter than this. It's a coordinated attack and you know it.
I hope like hell Rs use all these tactics going forward so we can burn it down and refresh the tree of liberty.
Dems mad/sad they lost. Then start a war.
fFS
Second hand? Possibly worse.
You are smarter than this. It's a coordinated attack and you know it.
I hope like hell Rs use all these tactics going forward so we can burn it down and refresh the tree of liberty.
Dems mad/sad they lost. Then start a war.
fFS
Posted on 9/26/19 at 3:57 pm to timdonaghyswhistle
quote:
Who says it's factual? Better yet, even if you believe every word, a lot of those words are interpretation of second hand accounts.
Would you like to be tried with admissable hearsay?
What do you think is the result of a credible whistleblower complaint?
Posted on 9/26/19 at 3:59 pm to roadGator
quote:
Factual?
"If factual"
In the hypothetical scenario where events happened exactly as described in the complaint what do you think your position would be?
Posted on 9/26/19 at 4:05 pm to bmy
What do you think is the result of a two year investigation that resulted in NOTHING? You’re a troll. Get out of here with your crap.
Posted on 9/26/19 at 4:05 pm to bmy
Is it typical to get an attorney involved over political butthurt after losing an election your lazy arse, corrupt candidate lost. Even as the fake news was busy pre-ejaculating over the W? LOL!
Face it, own it and educate yourselves. The Dem party is out of touch with much of America. Americans don't want to turn our nation into Russia, Cuba or Venezuela. Americans don't want street mobs supporting tyrants dictating every facet of their lives. Americans grow up wanting to live the American dream, not a socialist nightmare. And the loony Democrat party has given them a simple choice. They choose to put up with some crude language along from a guy who loves the country and them and wants to preserve the greatest lifestyles the world has ever seen. Got it?
Face it, own it and educate yourselves. The Dem party is out of touch with much of America. Americans don't want to turn our nation into Russia, Cuba or Venezuela. Americans don't want street mobs supporting tyrants dictating every facet of their lives. Americans grow up wanting to live the American dream, not a socialist nightmare. And the loony Democrat party has given them a simple choice. They choose to put up with some crude language along from a guy who loves the country and them and wants to preserve the greatest lifestyles the world has ever seen. Got it?
Posted on 9/26/19 at 4:08 pm to bmy
quote:
Are we pretending that he did something no other attorney could? It's nothing special.. what nefarious role could lawfare have possibly served here?
Lawfare has been on record in that they want this President impeached. They've even tried it working with people on the emoluments end. . I doubt that this CIA person knew much about the law, this thing was orchestrated and directed with lawfare waiting in the wings most probably with a prepared document .
Wittes is an extreme partisan and an all around shithead. Years ago he tried to smear one of my clients with b.s. charges, we shut his arse down.....I don't know if there is another attorney I really hate as a person more than Ben Wittes. I wish he would no longer exist as an attorney or a human being.
Posted on 9/26/19 at 4:09 pm to roadGator
quote:
The dems have really escalated politics closer to war.
Why is anyone shocked by this? They literally held a banner in Berkeley that stated, "This is war", after the 2016 election.
Posted on 9/26/19 at 4:11 pm to bmy
quote:
In the hypothetical scenario where events happened exactly as described in the complaint what do you think your position would be?
Call me crazy, but I doubt the WB would have used a militant dem legal operation created for the sole purpose of getting Trump out of office.
Posted on 9/26/19 at 4:15 pm to roadGator
quote:
As far as I can tell the Rs don't have a similar fighting force.
The dems have really escalated politics closer to war.
Either the Rs fight or lose.
But don't forget, voters will still have the opportunity to weigh in with their response in November of 2020.
Posted on 9/26/19 at 4:19 pm to TidenUP
I'm glad I remembered this from last week. We know what type of people like lawfare.
quote:
Decatur
LSU Fan
Member since Mar 2007
24128 posts
Online
re: Are there any news apps or outlets worth your time anymore?Posted on 9/18/19 at 4:27 pm to TigerOnTheMountain
Lawfareblog.com
Posted on 9/26/19 at 4:22 pm to KiwiHead
quote:
. I doubt that this CIA person knew much about the law, this thing was orchestrated and directed with lawfare waiting in the wings most probably with a prepared document .
Again -- so what? If the facts are accurate how could that possibly matter
Posted on 9/26/19 at 4:22 pm to bmy
quote:
what nefarious role could lawfare have possibly served here?
Posted on 9/26/19 at 4:24 pm to bmy
quote:
If the facts are accurate
Page 2 of 2
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News