- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Laura Loomer doxxes Riley Gaines in a now deleted rant | UPDATE: Gaines destroys Laura
Posted on 11/17/23 at 5:55 pm to thejuiceisloose
Posted on 11/17/23 at 5:55 pm to thejuiceisloose
quote:
Riley Gaines is simply an opportunity partisan hack. I don’t expect well reasoned political commentary from her
So mad. I get it. She isn’t in to you claiming to be a woman even though in your case I think it is accurate.
0
Posted on 11/17/23 at 6:00 pm to rmnldr
Seeing this has made it to 13 pages I imagine it is full of people making excuses for the psycho Loomer
Told y'all to get rid of this clown 6 months ago now here she is attacking one of the leaders in the fight for women's sports across the US
SMFH
Someone needs to get this bitch tf away from the Republican party period
Told y'all to get rid of this clown 6 months ago now here she is attacking one of the leaders in the fight for women's sports across the US
SMFH
Someone needs to get this bitch tf away from the Republican party period
Posted on 11/17/23 at 6:01 pm to Bobby OG Johnson
Normal people don’t give a single damn about this person, regardless of their political leanings. If they even have any idea who she is or ever heard of her.
Posted on 11/17/23 at 6:01 pm to thejuiceisloose
quote:
Riley Gaines is simply an opportunity partisan hack. I don’t expect well reasoned political commentary from her
Absolutely weak take.
Riely took that OPPORTUNITY to stand up against a dude who pretended to be a woman.
Because if it wasn't allowed in the 1st place, Riley & other women wouldn't have had to endure naked men in women's locker rooms or taking achievements away from women in the pool.
You're losing sight at the real enemy here.
Posted on 11/17/23 at 6:03 pm to Bobby OG Johnson
quote:
Someone needs to get this bitch tf away from the Republican party period
You're correct and there's one man that could do it with a Truth, Tweet or statement at a rally.
Posted on 11/17/23 at 6:03 pm to davyjones
quote:
Normal people don’t give a single damn about this person, regardless of their political leanings. If they even have any idea who she is or ever heard of her.
Every bit of what you just said is a motherfricking lie
Every one knows who this psycho bitch is and is watching like a hawk
This post was edited on 11/17/23 at 6:04 pm
Posted on 11/17/23 at 6:06 pm to Bobby OG Johnson
She's useful to Trump for now. But that won't last. Trump will make her into an enemy just like almost everyone else that's worked for him.
Posted on 11/17/23 at 6:09 pm to pankReb
quote:
She's useful to Trump for now. But that won't last. Trump will make her into an enemy just like almost everyone else that's worked for him.
Posted on 11/17/23 at 6:09 pm to Bobby OG Johnson
Yeah every one who’s not in the normal category. I’m like center of the spectrum on that because I know the name and small bits of information, but certainly not enough to carry an informed conversation about her. And the small amount I do “know” comes straight from this board.
So I guess I’m a mixed breed crazy/normal mutant. And I’m not intent on nor interested in knowing anything else about her either.
So I guess I’m a mixed breed crazy/normal mutant. And I’m not intent on nor interested in knowing anything else about her either.
Posted on 11/17/23 at 6:59 pm to davyjones
Yeah. She only has three followers. Lol.
FFS
FFS
Posted on 11/17/23 at 7:07 pm to rmnldr
I plead guilty to not knowing as much about Loomer as I probably should but what little I do know indicates she is a truly horrible human being
Posted on 11/17/23 at 7:09 pm to roadGator
Followers meaning on social media, I assume? Well how many is that, approximately? Out of a possible, what, 140 or 150 million people in this country of the sort who might have enough interest in politics to even possibly pay any real attention to this person……..we could consider this matter in light of those figures and get a roundabout sense of her possible level of influence.
Help me out with the “followers” number.
Help me out with the “followers” number.
Posted on 11/17/23 at 7:12 pm to davyjones
quote:
Help me out with the “followers” number.
You don’t understand followers?
You said not many would know about her but for this place. That’s dumb. Plain dumb.
Posted on 11/17/23 at 7:14 pm to rmnldr
Loomer proving to Nikki Stalin that just because you use your real name on the internet doesn't stop you from being a shitehead.
Posted on 11/17/23 at 7:21 pm to roadGator
Dude, are you not suggesting that she has a healthy number of followers, presumably meaning social media followers? Because I do know it’s a pretty common practice to gauge an individual’s popularity or “reach” these days via their level of social media following. So that’s what I’m asking, what’s her level? Let’s simplify it and just narrow it down to X following. 100k? 500k? A million? Because if it’s more like 100k, then relatively speaking that’s probably not even worth mentioning, thus she’s a negligible influence. But you did mention followers in this instance, indicating (1) that you have some familiarity with the level of her following/presence, and (2) that it is significant and worthy of mention.
This post was edited on 11/17/23 at 7:23 pm
Posted on 11/17/23 at 7:25 pm to davyjones
You need my help to figure out how many followers she has?
Nah.
Google has been around for a minute.
Nah.
Google has been around for a minute.
Posted on 11/17/23 at 7:31 pm to roadGator
I’m not on X, and although I’m sure I can find it via google and whatnot, I figured since you pushing back on that sole basis, that she has a stronger “following” than I might be aware, that you were familiar enough with it to do so. Because it is a relevant point or question: does she or doesn’t she have any real influence on anything of note?
This post was edited on 11/17/23 at 7:33 pm
Posted on 11/17/23 at 7:32 pm to rmnldr
I didn’t read all that but Texas A&M asked jimbo to be relevant and you see how that turned out.. shite happens with people over time
Posted on 11/17/23 at 7:35 pm to davyjones
quote:
does she or doesn’t she have any real influence on anything of note?
She has a kinda paltry following. 670k on Twitter
She has quite a bit of influence for that smallerish following based on her position in the hierarchy of Trumpism.
Gumbro likes to post her stuff here because he knows it’s valuable to have attack animals. Loomer is a jjbot level hack with the vitriol of a female version of Fat Bastard.
Trump won’t denounce her because he loves people who attack people for him.
Posted on 11/17/23 at 7:41 pm to davyjones
quote:
Because it is a relevant point or question: does she or doesn’t she have any real influence on anything of note?
Hard to quantify but the Trump OnlyFans dorks lap it up
Page 14 of 15
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News