- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Latest Updates: Russia-Ukraine Conflict.
Posted on 12/11/25 at 8:23 am to doubleb
Posted on 12/11/25 at 8:23 am to doubleb
quote:
Even though NATO has kept the peace for about 60 years?
Uh, yeah?
Eisenhower heavily influenced NATO during its creation (he was a huge proponent of military and economic integration as an aspect of coordinated defense structures) and was the first Supreme Allied Commander of Europe after its creation.
The entire point was to set up a structure where Europe wouldn't need the US to be there. US troops needed to be there when everyone was recovering from WW2, but no longer than that.
The alliance was supposed to keep the peace, not over a half century of US troops being there.
If anyone would know about NATO's aims, it's him.
Posted on 12/11/25 at 8:33 am to VolSquatch
quote:
Uh, yeah? Eisenhower heavily influenced NATO during its creation (he was a huge proponent of military and economic integration as an aspect of coordinated defense structures) and was the first Supreme Allied Commander of Europe after its creation. The entire point was to set up a structure where Europe wouldn't need the US to be there. US troops needed to be there when everyone was recovering from WW2, but no longer than that. The alliance was supposed to keep the peace, not over a half century of US troops being there. If anyone would know about NATO's aims, it's him.
NATO has been successful even though it hasn’t worked exactly how Ike wanted it.
I do agree that we didn’t ease out as designed and our troops shouldn’t be based in Europe, but that is our fault not NATO’s.
I also think Trump’s policy of making Europe more responsible for their defense is a good one. We shouldn’t be carrying all that weight.
Posted on 12/11/25 at 8:37 am to VolSquatch
quote:
We need another Eisenhower.
100%. Eisenhower never put the interests of foreign nations "allies" over the interest of the US. There are many examples of him holding these "allies" accountable and not bending to their interests.
Remember also what Washington and Jefferson warned about foreign wars and entanglements (treaties).
We use to have leaders that truly looked out for the interests of this nation and people.
But then we started getting the LBJ's, Clinton, Bush, Obama, Biden pos's.
Congress is no better.
This post was edited on 12/11/25 at 8:42 am
Posted on 12/11/25 at 10:59 am to doubleb
quote:
And over the we of those 60 years the United States has been the super power and the most prosperous nation in history.
After WWII, America had a fully intact industrial base and many of our economic competitors were heavily damaged. It takes a lot of money to be a super power.
Posted on 12/11/25 at 12:32 pm to AU86
quote:
100%. Eisenhower never put the interests of foreign nations "allies" over the interest of the US. There are many examples of him holding these "allies" accountable and not bending to their interests.
Ehhhh.... you want to be careful with this one. It's Eisenhower who started the US down the path to the Vietnam war, among other things, and I may never forgive him for bringing in Nixon on the ticket, who made it even worse.
quote:
Remember also what Washington and Jefferson warned about foreign wars and entanglements (treaties).
We use to have leaders that truly looked out for the interests of this nation and people.
But then we started getting the LBJ's, Clinton, Bush, Obama, Biden pos's.
Congress is no better
Look, I agree with you on all of this, but that doesn't change the fact that what goes on outside of our borders concerns us. The answer isn't to stick our heads in the ground like an ostrich but to actual come up with actual politcy to make it work. Hell, we're being handed a geopolitical win (one that didn't require a fraction of death that have occured) and we're squandering it, which means we are going to be on the hook for even more security in the future. It's exhausting.
Posted on 12/11/25 at 1:08 pm to doubleb
Siversk remains under control of Defense Forces – military
11.12.2025 19:50
In the Sloviansk sector, the city of Siversk remains under the control of Ukraine's Defense Forces, and counter-sabotage measures continue.
The Operation Task Force East stated this on Facebook, Ukrinform reports.
The enemy is trying to infiltrate Siversk in small groups, taking advantage of unfavorable weather conditions, but most of these units are being destroyed on the approaches.
Ukraine's Defense Forces also continue to control the northern part of Pokrovsk. In the central part of the city, Ukrainian soldiers are blocking the enemy's advance.
In Myrnohrad, Ukrainian units are holding defensive lines and eliminating the enemy on the approaches to the city.
Logistics remain difficult. To strengthen supply capabilities, measures are being taken to expand the logistics corridors to Myrnohrad.
Since the beginning of the day, units of the Ukrainian Armed Forces in the area of responsibility of the Operation Task Force East have repelled 68 Russian assaults.
In the Pokrovsk direction, Russian troops attempted to advance 33 times on the positions of Ukrainian troops in the areas of the settlements of Shakhov, Rodynske, Myrnohrad, Pokrovsk, Kotlyne, Udachne, Molodetsek, and in the direction of Novopavlivka. Defenders have already repelled 31 attacks, and fighting continues..
As Ukrinform reported, Huliaipole remains under the control of the Defense Forces, with the enemy being destroyed on the city's approaches.
Ukrinform
11.12.2025 19:50
In the Sloviansk sector, the city of Siversk remains under the control of Ukraine's Defense Forces, and counter-sabotage measures continue.
The Operation Task Force East stated this on Facebook, Ukrinform reports.
The enemy is trying to infiltrate Siversk in small groups, taking advantage of unfavorable weather conditions, but most of these units are being destroyed on the approaches.
Ukraine's Defense Forces also continue to control the northern part of Pokrovsk. In the central part of the city, Ukrainian soldiers are blocking the enemy's advance.
In Myrnohrad, Ukrainian units are holding defensive lines and eliminating the enemy on the approaches to the city.
Logistics remain difficult. To strengthen supply capabilities, measures are being taken to expand the logistics corridors to Myrnohrad.
Since the beginning of the day, units of the Ukrainian Armed Forces in the area of responsibility of the Operation Task Force East have repelled 68 Russian assaults.
In the Pokrovsk direction, Russian troops attempted to advance 33 times on the positions of Ukrainian troops in the areas of the settlements of Shakhov, Rodynske, Myrnohrad, Pokrovsk, Kotlyne, Udachne, Molodetsek, and in the direction of Novopavlivka. Defenders have already repelled 31 attacks, and fighting continues..
As Ukrinform reported, Huliaipole remains under the control of the Defense Forces, with the enemy being destroyed on the city's approaches.
Ukrinform
Posted on 12/11/25 at 1:50 pm to cypher
The situation appears to be deteriorating rapidly for Ukraine in the fortress city Kostyantynivka.


Posted on 12/11/25 at 3:45 pm to texag7
quote:
quote:
It's best just to walk past the crazy guy yelling outside the CVS...
Lots of mirrors outside your local CVS?
No, you've just got meth vision screwing with you...
Posted on 12/11/25 at 4:23 pm to doubleb
quote:
Even though NATO has kept the peace for about 60 years?
And over the we of those 60 years the United States has been the super power and the most prosperous nation in history.
NATO help stymie the Commies in Eastern Europe and later bring those eastern countries that were occupied under their umbrella.
Yep. But...
NATO was part of a big bribe... not really to protect Europe, but to protect the US. Western Europe was always just pawns and human shields stopping the Soviets from getting to the Atlantic Coast of Europe and being in a position to threaten the US. ICBMs kind of made that a bit outdated, then it shifted to denying the Soviets more territory and more resources/industries and warm bodies to absorb. At that point, cutting the nuts off of the Communist political movements that were present and somewhat popular in all of those European countries became more important... and the way we did that was by freeing them up to go full on Social programs (Socialism), so their governments could say "you've got everything you would get under Communism but with freedom and free enterprise, too, which you would not have!" It worked like a charm. We let them undercontribute militarily because we didn't think a hot war was very likely and it was more in our interests to have them prevent the spread of Soviet-friendly Communism politically (people have forgotten that many of The Iron Curtain/Eastern Europe Communist Bloc countries were not militarily turned Communist after WWII, instead they convinced people to vote for it through propaganda).
All of that became outdated in 1990. We didn't navigate refocusing ourselves and imagining the new paradigm very well.
But Europe has gotten the bigger message: in today's world, they are bound together by necessity into a Union of countries, based on the US. Mutual security and economics... otherwise they are too small, weak and vulnerable.
Which is weird that Trump publicly stated he wants to pull the countries he likes (Hungary, Poland, Italy...) away from the EU... weakening them and the collective... making them easier prey, I guess. Britain has come to its senses and wants back in...
Posted on 12/11/25 at 4:32 pm to Lee B
Zelensky says "I see your peaceplan and I raise you..."
Posted on 12/11/25 at 5:45 pm to T1gerNate
quote:
The situation appears to be deteriorating rapidly for Ukraine in the fortress city Kostyantynivka.
Actual war stuff like this won’t get touched here man. Gotta post a twitter link about Russias economy etc.
Posted on 12/11/25 at 5:50 pm to cypher
quote:
cypher
Siversk remains under control of Defense Forces – military
Unfortunately for Ukraine, this isn't true. Russians raised flags in 30 locations around the city. That doesn't mean that Russia has full control of Siversk, but Ukraine most definitely does not have control.
Posted on 12/11/25 at 5:51 pm to texag7
Cope the Ukrainian JB should be banned like the Russian JB.
Posted on 12/11/25 at 6:01 pm to Leopold
quote:
Look, I agree with you on all of this, but that doesn't change the fact that what goes on outside of our borders concerns us. The answer isn't to stick our heads in the ground like an ostrich but to actual come up with actual politcy to make it work. Hell, we're being handed a geopolitical win (one that didn't require a fraction of death that have occured) and we're squandering it, which means we are going to be on the hook for even more security in the future. It's exhausting.
The greatest danger that this country currently faces is right here among us.
Unfettered immigration and Radical leftists that hate the constitution and it's founding principles. A welfare state that allowed in millions of illegals with open borders and 80% are on some type of government check. All of this being forced on the American people and I am suppose to be more concerned with what happens in Ukraine or Gaza? 38 trillion in debt and we continue squandering billions on foreign wars while China sits by and just smiles. What about the future of the young people in this country?
This post was edited on 12/11/25 at 6:14 pm
Posted on 12/11/25 at 6:39 pm to Lee B
quote:
Would those be the same people in Ukraine posters mock for going out to discos and otherwise living as normal as they can lives all through this?
According to kyiv news, some of them died today...............
Posted on 12/11/25 at 6:48 pm to trinidadtiger
Over 400 pages in this thread....and Mother Russia keeps advancing.
Posted on 12/11/25 at 6:56 pm to trinidadtiger
quote:
adtigerOver 400 pages in this thread....and Mother Russia keeps advancing.
Amazing.
You’d have thought Russia would have wrapped this thing up over three years ago.
Posted on 12/11/25 at 7:43 pm to Lee B
Dude from day 1 the business of the US has been business. Europe was the main trading partner for the US. Post WWII Europe was a market for steel, crude oil and refined products along with all sorts of manufactured goods as well as investment opportunity. Since the late 1800's Europe was a major market for US grain. That is when the breadbasket of Europe switched from Ukraine to the Great Plains. Even Ukrainians know this.
Posted on 12/11/25 at 8:03 pm to GOP_Tiger
quote:
Unfortunately for Ukraine, this isn't true. Russians raised flags in 30 locations around the city. That doesn't mean that Russia has full control of Siversk, but Ukraine most definitely does not have control.
A Russian without any supplies puts a flag on a building might mean occupation of that building.
I doubt that either side actually controls the city
It may be a fortress city, but it is not in what is considered, since 2014, the Fortress Belt.
This post was edited on 12/11/25 at 8:06 pm
Popular
Back to top



1



