- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: LA's stupid sales tax system has been sued
Posted on 11/17/21 at 11:50 am to LSUFanHouston
Posted on 11/17/21 at 11:50 am to LSUFanHouston
quote:
This commission is going to have employees who do the actual work.
We actually don't know that because they've told us frick all about their entire process. It's ambiguous and shite, they can't even tell the parishes how much they will charge (It says fair and reasonable). So what's fair for Baton Rouge is going to be fair for East Feliciana? How does that work? Caddo parish going to send employees who are now out of a job to Baton Rouge to work? They even pitched this as a job creator. When in fact it puts employees out of jobs in 63 parishes across the state.
Posted on 11/17/21 at 11:59 am to Tiger Prawn
quote:
instead of creating a brand new commission full of political appointees.
They only went this route in order to appease all the dumbasses who opposed the centralized collections because they were worried the state would have control over the lical tax money. The commission was to be made up of all local agents. Bad idea? Yes. But btter than the status quo. Can't win.
This post was edited on 11/17/21 at 12:02 pm
Posted on 11/17/21 at 11:59 am to Broke
quote:
We actually don't know that because they've told us frick all about their entire process. It's ambiguous and shite, they can't even tell the parishes how much they will charge (It says fair and reasonable). So what's fair for Baton Rouge is going to be fair for East Feliciana? How does that work? Caddo parish going to send employees who are now out of a job to Baton Rouge to work? They even pitched this as a job creator. When in fact it puts employees out of jobs in 63 parishes across the state.
So it puts government workers in 63 parishes out of work and you see this as a negative?
If they layoff 63 plus workers and the state hired half that number to do the work then it’s a big win for smaller government and for taxpayers.
There are too many government workers now and you want to protect their jobs?
Posted on 11/17/21 at 12:05 pm to doubleb
quote:
There are too many government workers now and you want to protect their jobs?
I'm concerned about the state having ultimate power in collecting sales tax. You can call it fair or whatever you want. But it will become corrupted and stuff will go wrong. All we have to do is look at our "fair" legislature to see how this works. I want small government and I want it on the most local level as possible. Where the people maintain the power.
Posted on 11/17/21 at 12:13 pm to Broke
quote:
We actually don't know that because they've told us frick all about their entire process.
Oh come on. Of course they are going to have employees to do the work. Political appointees are not going to be conducing audits and processing items. You are losing credibility here.
quote:
Caddo parish going to send employees who are now out of a job to Baton Rouge to work? They even pitched this as a job creator. When in fact it puts employees out of jobs in 63 parishes across the state.
They will have local offices across the state. Yes, some employees might be out of a job, while other parishes might pick up a few jobs (where the offices are located).
Posted on 11/17/21 at 12:15 pm to Broke
quote:
Yes, the sales tax collectors in those offices know about taxes. Members of the board have no idea what is going on. The only people with solid working knowledge of the situation is the employees that are actually collecting the sales tax. They won't be appointed to any position here and we all know it.
That is literally not true. The remote seller's commission has the people that actually run collections at the local level:
LINK
Posted on 11/17/21 at 12:18 pm to Broke
quote:
It's ambiguous and shite, they can't even tell the parishes how much they will charge (It says fair and reasonable).
OK really quick, how much do parish collects charge for the entities they collect for? That's not ambiguous at all
quote:
They even pitched this as a job creator. When in fact it puts employees out of jobs in 63 parishes across the state.
Now we get to heart of the matter. Protecting local government jobs is more important to you than having a more rational tax structure, that reduces burdens on business and makes us more in line with the rest of the country.
Your uncle a sheriff?
Posted on 11/17/21 at 12:19 pm to Broke
quote:
I'm concerned about the state having ultimate power in collecting sales tax. You can call it fair or whatever you want. But it will become corrupted and stuff will go wrong. All we have to do is look at our "fair" legislature to see how this works. I want small government and I want it on the most local level as possible. Where the people maintain the power.
Do 49 other states have their counties collecting local sales taxes?
Do they have issues there?
Right now the EBR Parish Revenue Dept. collects taxes for thd city, the parish, the schools, etc. Each entity doesn’t collect sakes tax, one parish department does because it’s simpler. A statewide commission would be even simpler.
Posted on 11/17/21 at 12:22 pm to LSUFanHouston
What made me vote no was all the politicians going all over the state holding meetings to get us to vote yes for it. Made me think they were wanting to take over an fill their pockets
Posted on 11/17/21 at 12:36 pm to LSUFanHouston
quote:
Also... by your token... should every single tac district in the state collect tax on their own?
Yes. We should really pay attention to who we pay our taxes to and how much we pay and where it goes.
We don’t. We auto deduct our paychecks and just hit a button once in April and that’s it.
Tax payroll deductions should be illegal.
Every single tax paying citizen should be required to write a check to every single entity they owe taxes to every year. That would cause some political activism and awareness which we are sorely lacking in this country.
That’s my entire problem with this. Businesses are saying “it’s too complicated to figure out where my taxes go. Let me just hand you a huge chunk of money without thinking about it and you figure it out.”
This post was edited on 11/17/21 at 12:40 pm
Posted on 11/17/21 at 1:01 pm to LSUFanHouston
I work extensively in the state and local tax field in Louisiana. I won’t argue the merits of the amendment because I do believe there is a dire need for a conventional overhaul to our tax structure and, more specifically, the sales tax.
However, your assertion that opposing the amendment is “anti-business” ignores the plain fact that large businesses propped by LABI are the reason the code is so fricked up. The businesses pushing this overhaul lobbied the legislature over time to include niche exclusions in 47:301 for various processes. The result is a frankensteins’s monster of highly specific exclusions from tax that are a nightmare to comb through if you’re a small business owner. For example, electricity purchased specifically for a Chlor-alkali manufacturing process is excluded from sales tax at the state level but other sales of electricity are not. On the other hand, all utilities are exempt at the local level so there’s never sales tax on electricity there. Why do we have a exclusion this specific? Because some chemical company paid LABI some money to get it on the books.
On a further point, Louisiana is not anti-business. It’s pro-BIG business to the detriment of individuals and small businesses. Here’s an example. In 2015, the Tax Foundation (a neutral tax analytics group) did a study on effective tax rates on big business in every state. They found that a new, capital-intensive manufacturing company in Louisiana would pay an effective tax rate equal to 0.1% of its income when accounting for income, property, and sales taxes. The vast majority of our industry is capital-intensive manufacturing. At that same time, the state was raising the sales tax rate on all of us because of a budget shortage. It’s simply unjustified to say that the system is anti-business when factual statistics like that exist.
I also don’t write this to say that I think businesses shouldn’t get tax breaks, because I absolutely do. I want to foster business in this state and taxes assist that goal. However, we don’t have to give up the farm every time a plant bats its eyes at us. The taxes help, but they’re coming here for convenient access to the Mississippi, Panama Canal, and extensive maritime shipping capability on top of the shite in the ground. They just push us on taxes to see what they can get away with and we give the farm every single time. Then, after we’ve given the farm, the legislature decides we’re in a budget crises and raises taxes on the us and small businesses.
Unfortunately, that’s just how the sausage is made here.
TL;DR: Reform is needed, but I’m not giving LABI credit for trying to fix the problem they created.
However, your assertion that opposing the amendment is “anti-business” ignores the plain fact that large businesses propped by LABI are the reason the code is so fricked up. The businesses pushing this overhaul lobbied the legislature over time to include niche exclusions in 47:301 for various processes. The result is a frankensteins’s monster of highly specific exclusions from tax that are a nightmare to comb through if you’re a small business owner. For example, electricity purchased specifically for a Chlor-alkali manufacturing process is excluded from sales tax at the state level but other sales of electricity are not. On the other hand, all utilities are exempt at the local level so there’s never sales tax on electricity there. Why do we have a exclusion this specific? Because some chemical company paid LABI some money to get it on the books.
On a further point, Louisiana is not anti-business. It’s pro-BIG business to the detriment of individuals and small businesses. Here’s an example. In 2015, the Tax Foundation (a neutral tax analytics group) did a study on effective tax rates on big business in every state. They found that a new, capital-intensive manufacturing company in Louisiana would pay an effective tax rate equal to 0.1% of its income when accounting for income, property, and sales taxes. The vast majority of our industry is capital-intensive manufacturing. At that same time, the state was raising the sales tax rate on all of us because of a budget shortage. It’s simply unjustified to say that the system is anti-business when factual statistics like that exist.
I also don’t write this to say that I think businesses shouldn’t get tax breaks, because I absolutely do. I want to foster business in this state and taxes assist that goal. However, we don’t have to give up the farm every time a plant bats its eyes at us. The taxes help, but they’re coming here for convenient access to the Mississippi, Panama Canal, and extensive maritime shipping capability on top of the shite in the ground. They just push us on taxes to see what they can get away with and we give the farm every single time. Then, after we’ve given the farm, the legislature decides we’re in a budget crises and raises taxes on the us and small businesses.
Unfortunately, that’s just how the sausage is made here.
TL;DR: Reform is needed, but I’m not giving LABI credit for trying to fix the problem they created.
Posted on 11/17/21 at 1:10 pm to Tiger Prawn
quote:
It may have had more support if the proposed amendment would have just put it under the Dept of Revenue's jurisdiction instead of creating a brand new commission full of political appointees.
This basically.
The change will eventually happen, whether through judicial fiat or a midterm/presidential election year where turnout is better and the amendment has a much better chance of passing.
And it will be much different than what was proposed this year which is a big government solution.
Turnout for off year elections is ridiculously low.
Posted on 11/17/21 at 1:20 pm to Dixie Normus
quote:
Dixie Normus
I don't agree with everything you said, but you raise a lot of good points...about an entirely different set of issues.
None of what you bring up has to do with sales tax collection. And the sales tax collection system is most certainly not of LABI's creation. The belongs squarely at the feet of local government.
Posted on 11/17/21 at 1:22 pm to BigJim
quote:
OK really quick, how much do parish collects charge for the entities they collect for? That's not ambiguous at all
Every parish does it different. Some use actual expenses and some do a % of collections for the month
Posted on 11/17/21 at 1:39 pm to LSUFanHouston
Agree - in total with the OP.
The minute Destroya came out against #1, EVERYONE should have known this would be good for businesses in the state.
Of course if any research was done prior to voting, it was 1st grade simple to vote in favor.
Hope the suit is successful.
The minute Destroya came out against #1, EVERYONE should have known this would be good for businesses in the state.
Of course if any research was done prior to voting, it was 1st grade simple to vote in favor.
Hope the suit is successful.
Posted on 11/17/21 at 1:46 pm to LSUFanHouston
quote:
So the new commission is half local people and half state people.
And all in it for themselves.
C'Mon man...it's Louisiana.
Posted on 11/17/21 at 1:48 pm to LSUFanHouston
quote:
MTU supports getting rid of national income taxes and replacing with a national consumption (sales) tax.
You would think that would get them more tax money but then the poors who don't pay income tax would have to actually pay into it.
Posted on 11/17/21 at 1:50 pm to BigJim
quote:
None of what you bring up has to do with sales tax collection. And the sales tax collection system is most certainly not of LABI's creation. The belongs squarely at the feet of local government.
I admit I probably got on a tangent. I reiterate that I agree some overhaul is due, but I don’t think the collection system is the primary problem. It’s not difficult to file state and local sales tax forms through the portal. Could it be simpler? Yes. However, the larger problem with them is how difficult it is to figure out what you owe. There’s also some motives behind the push for this centralized system that I’d rather not put in writing, but the gist is that the centralized system would come with the removal of the remaining few teeth the collectors have in their pockets for pursuing taxes against perpetual non-payers.
Posted on 11/17/21 at 1:53 pm to Nguyener
quote:
Tax payroll deductions should be illegal.
Every single tax paying citizen should be required to write a check to every single entity they owe taxes to every year. That would cause some political activism and awareness which we are sorely lacking in this country.
It would also cause massive under-collections. People would just say F it, I'm not paying, and the tax agencies don't have enough resources to go after everyone.
Posted on 11/17/21 at 1:54 pm to doubleb
quote:
If they layoff 63 plus workers and the state hired half that number to do the work
When has the state hired "half the number to do the work"? The state would hire 4X the number to do half the work.
How old are some of you? We don't have a few more decades for y'all to figure this out.
Popular
Back to top



3





