- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Kyle Rittenhouse Jury Deliberation Day 3: Reported Jury is done deliberating for the day
Posted on 11/18/21 at 4:17 pm to Bamafan24
Posted on 11/18/21 at 4:17 pm to Bamafan24
quote:If the foreman is not working in good faith, the other jurors have the right to pass a note to the judge telling the judge that the foreperson is not following their oath.
I would be lucking up how to get rid of this foreman Karen person and be done with this trial.
Posted on 11/18/21 at 4:20 pm to BuckyCheese
The Judge then says the jurors can go look online and do their own research after the defense attorneys objected to giving the juror the jury instructions to take home.
WTF?
WTF?
Posted on 11/18/21 at 4:21 pm to HubbaBubba
Is she Jon Cusack Jr? Who knows what advice she is receiving in the evenings and from whom?
Posted on 11/18/21 at 4:22 pm to LC412000
This is insane going into day 4, the jury system is broken
Posted on 11/18/21 at 4:24 pm to Ace Midnight
"Sure. Bring the instructions home."
I'm pretty sure, they can't.
I'm pretty sure, they can't.
Posted on 11/18/21 at 4:24 pm to HubbaBubba
quote:
If the foreman is not working in good faith, the other jurors have the right to pass a note to the judge telling the judge that the foreperson is not following their oath.
1) Do they know that they can do this
2) Did the prosecution add reduced charges for the jury to consider? IF SO, why can they do that? To me it means they know their case stinks.
Posted on 11/18/21 at 4:27 pm to tiger91
Would be interesting to know what the 6 alts think. Would love to know their verdict and thoughts about the others.
Posted on 11/18/21 at 4:27 pm to MrLSU
quote:
The Judge then says the jurors can go look online and do their own research after the defense attorneys objected to giving the juror the jury instructions to take home.
WTF?
Twitter will decide the trial
And you all said "twitter isnt real"
Posted on 11/18/21 at 4:29 pm to tiger91
quote:
If the foreman is not working in good faith, the other jurors have the right to pass a note to the judge telling the judge that the foreperson is not following their oath.
1) Do they know that they can do this
This.
Most people have no idea what is allowed and what isn't.
Posted on 11/18/21 at 4:30 pm to Caraway Rye
Why is the jury taking so long?
This is the easiest case to find not guilty.
The juror has been tampered and or threatened by the woke mob.
If true these individuals need a massive sentence
This is the easiest case to find not guilty.
The juror has been tampered and or threatened by the woke mob.
If true these individuals need a massive sentence
Posted on 11/18/21 at 4:31 pm to ApexTiger
quote:
Why is the jury taking so long?
They're hung. Or they're negotiating a compromise verdict.
Posted on 11/18/21 at 4:31 pm to ApexTiger
quote:
The juror has been tampered and or threatened by the woke mob.
Or it's as simple as a progressive or two on the jury.
Law doesn't matter to them. Outcomes do.
Posted on 11/18/21 at 4:35 pm to BuckyCheese
There is no way the jury is allowed to look up anything
I think it is a mistrial to let them take jury instructions home
I think it is a mistrial to let them take jury instructions home
Posted on 11/18/21 at 4:35 pm to BuckyCheese
Honest question, what is the big deal about bringing to instructions home? They are available online for the whole world to see.
Posted on 11/18/21 at 4:37 pm to BuckyCheese
After a 7 hour day and 21 hours of deliberations, she's not taking the instructions home to pour over them for some golden revelation that hasn't been found in 3 days work. She's 100% trying to find some legal opinions on Google that justify a guilty conviction.
She's gonna come back tomorrow morning with a notebook full of legal jargon she doesn't understand and use it to tell everyone else why they're wrong for 7 more hours.
She's gonna come back tomorrow morning with a notebook full of legal jargon she doesn't understand and use it to tell everyone else why they're wrong for 7 more hours.
Posted on 11/18/21 at 4:38 pm to TDTOM
quote:
Honest question, what is the big deal about bringing to instructions home? They are available online for the whole world to see.
Because the probability of just looking at only the instructions is next to 0%. They're gonna google their assses off.
Posted on 11/18/21 at 4:38 pm to TDTOM
The Court just indirectly gave them permission to do their own independent work on the verdict outside of the jury room.
Posted on 11/18/21 at 4:38 pm to TDTOM
quote:
Honest question, what is the big deal about bringing to instructions home? They are available online for the whole world to see.
It gives her cover to say "I took these instructions home, and if you look at x, y, and z evidence..."
But in actuality, she is reading things on the internet or is being supplied infomation to convince more jurors.
And in the morning, she has cover as to why she came up with these new thoughts.
That's the big deal.
Posted on 11/18/21 at 4:39 pm to KosmoCramer
quote:
The enhanced still shots are the only "evidence" where provocation is claimed.
Does anyone have these shots that can be posted here?
Posted on 11/18/21 at 4:39 pm to TDTOM
I haven't followed this trial as closely as some of you, but 4 days of deliberation equals one of two things:
1) Guilty verdict incoming (probably lesser charges)
2) Hung jury
I hope it's the latter, but I doubt it.
1) Guilty verdict incoming (probably lesser charges)
2) Hung jury
I hope it's the latter, but I doubt it.
Popular
Back to top



2





