- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Posted on 11/9/21 at 10:37 am to BlackHelicopterPilot
Kyle Rittenhouse is about to be a very rich young man. He is going to own multiple media outlets.
Posted on 11/9/21 at 10:38 am to BlackHelicopterPilot
quote:
I think the Defense needs to stand up and say “ I would like to charge the Prosecution with plagiarism. They stole and presented OUR case as their own!”
Posted on 11/9/21 at 10:38 am to teke184
quote:
no one intentionally lays down and gives the opposition a win.
I wouldn't think so either but it's absolutely difficult to tell whether their witnesses belong to them or the defense. If this is their A-game I hope I see them if I ever get prosecuted for something.
Posted on 11/9/21 at 10:39 am to Flats
remember, the prosecution had ALL OF THIS EVIDENCE FOR MONTHS and still went forward with this charade.
this is the world we are in now.
this is the world we are in now.
Posted on 11/9/21 at 10:39 am to tommy2tone1999
quote:yes, but that hand appears to have been close enough that blood spatter might have made it to the gun, but they didnt swab the barrel
In the video it doesn't appear that he actually grabbed the gun, but he didn't have to. He was clearly reaching for it
Posted on 11/9/21 at 10:41 am to narddogg81
Apparently CSI Kenosha is staffed by fricking geniuses.
Posted on 11/9/21 at 10:42 am to narddogg81
What gets me is the fact that the prosecution is trying to establish that Rittenhouse had the intent to shoot Rosenbaum in the back. All four shots were fired in less than one second in rapid succession. and the shot to the groin likely caused Rosenbaum to fall as he was being shot.
Posted on 11/9/21 at 10:44 am to tommy2tone1999
quote:
What gets me is the fact that the prosecution is trying to establish that Rittenhouse had the intent to shoot Rosenbaum in the back.
Despite that attempt, the Dr. just confirmed that it was caused by falling forward/into a horizontal position after the first shot.
Defense is going to hammer them on that when they get their chance.
Posted on 11/9/21 at 10:44 am to tommy2tone1999
They are trying to misrepresent things because this is all they have.
Admitting that the guy got shot in the dick at point blank range while trying to grab the gun should be enough to kill any chances of a conviction on that count.
Admitting that the guy got shot in the dick at point blank range while trying to grab the gun should be enough to kill any chances of a conviction on that count.
Posted on 11/9/21 at 10:46 am to tommy2tone1999
Prosecution got the witness to admit it was possible the back to front wounds were created while Rosenbaum was falling. And that the hand injury was caused by reaching for the rifle 
Posted on 11/9/21 at 10:46 am to teke184
Palm to the ground... almost like he was trying to grab something
Posted on 11/9/21 at 10:46 am to teke184
THERE IT IS!!!!!!!
"(THE HAND WOUND) CAN ONLY BE SUSTAINED IN CLOSE PROXIMITY OR IN CONTACT WITH THE RIFLE"
"(THE HAND WOUND) CAN ONLY BE SUSTAINED IN CLOSE PROXIMITY OR IN CONTACT WITH THE RIFLE"
Posted on 11/9/21 at 10:47 am to rt3
quote:
THERE IT IS!!!!!!!
"(THE HAND WOUND) CAN ONLY BE SUSTAINED IN CLOSE PROXIMITY OR IN CONTACT WITH THE RIFLE"
The look on his face

This post was edited on 11/9/21 at 10:48 am
Posted on 11/9/21 at 10:49 am to jatilen
Don't they interview these guys extensively and roughly know what they're going to say to a specific question?
Posted on 11/9/21 at 10:49 am to jatilen
I hope that fat frick struggles daily with the liquid shits.
Posted on 11/9/21 at 10:49 am to Flats
That hurt. Did the defense not cross?
Posted on 11/9/21 at 10:52 am to TDTOM
quote:
That hurt. Did the defense not cross?
not yet
the judge called for a break... not sure if the prosecution is finished yet... prosecution may continue with direct questioning this ME after the break
Posted on 11/9/21 at 10:52 am to TDTOM
quote:
That hurt. Did the defense not cross?
They will when they return from the break

This post was edited on 11/9/21 at 10:53 am
Posted on 11/9/21 at 10:54 am to rt3
interesting... the prosecution tried to DQ potential jurors who knew/understood about stippling during jury selection?
Popular
Back to top



0








