- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Kyle Rittenhouse- Jury Instructions/Closing Arguments
Posted on 11/15/21 at 9:31 am to RealDawg
Posted on 11/15/21 at 9:31 am to RealDawg
quote:
Imagine your life depending on 12 people off the street to understand 37 pages of legal instructions
Yep. Large majority can’t even hold out and read a tweet or a news article
Good luck getting them to be locked in and pay attention for all of that
3
Posted on 11/15/21 at 9:34 am to Lawyered
Damn. It sounded like he was going to pull out that grainy image and video but unfortunately not.
Posted on 11/15/21 at 9:36 am to Lawyered
They know the main charges and the highlighted testimony of a the main witness admitting he got what he deserved.
If they convict on anything it will be some lesser BS of minor with a firearm.
If this judge has more than 2 brain cells, he'll bypass any lesser crap and let Kyle go.
If they convict on anything it will be some lesser BS of minor with a firearm.
If this judge has more than 2 brain cells, he'll bypass any lesser crap and let Kyle go.
Posted on 11/15/21 at 9:38 am to riccoar
I hate the idea of the defendant having to raise an "affirmative defense." It should always be the State's job to prove the charge.
Posted on 11/15/21 at 9:40 am to Floating Change Up
If they cause a mistrial by such circumstances, I would think it would be a mistrial with prejudice, meaning they can’t bring the case again.
They are losing here so if their only strategy is a do-over, they need to drop the fricking charges.
They are losing here so if their only strategy is a do-over, they need to drop the fricking charges.
Posted on 11/15/21 at 9:40 am to MFn GIMP
are they really fighting over the fact if the AR-15 is an SBR or not?
Posted on 11/15/21 at 9:40 am to Lawyered
COUNT 6 DISMISSED
Posted on 11/15/21 at 9:40 am to MFn GIMP
Yes! That was the charge that I thought Rittenhouse was most likely to be convicted on.
Posted on 11/15/21 at 9:40 am to teke184
judge dismissed weapons charge!? 
Posted on 11/15/21 at 9:40 am to MFn GIMP
Count 6 dismissed. Damn son.
Posted on 11/15/21 at 9:41 am to KosmoCramer
How is the prosecution not found in contempt that they knowingly submitted a charge that was a lie...
Posted on 11/15/21 at 9:41 am to rumproast
That’s crazy that the prosecutor knew the gun barrel wasn’t short enough to warrant the charge but pressed forward with it anyway. Good dismissal of charge there. What a waste of time and money.
Posted on 11/15/21 at 9:41 am to MFn GIMP
The prosecutor just admitted that a charge of the rifle being a short barreled rifle was not a correct charge. The loser was charging Rittenhouse with something that he knew was not correct. What a loser!
Posted on 11/15/21 at 9:41 am to KosmoCramer
But muh assault rifle...
muh state lines...
muh state lines...
Posted on 11/15/21 at 9:42 am to Lsut81
quote:
How is the prosecution not found in contempt that they knowingly submitted a charge that was a lie...
Then argued to let the jury decide on if he was guilty anyway. Just another ridiculous action by the government.
Posted on 11/15/21 at 9:42 am to LSUGrrrl
The prosecutor apparently used the same playbook as the federal prosecutors who went after the Enron guys.
A bunch of those people plead out on charges then it later went to court on appeal and the judges said “Those charges aren’t crimes.”
A bunch of those people plead out on charges then it later went to court on appeal and the judges said “Those charges aren’t crimes.”
Posted on 11/15/21 at 9:43 am to TDTOM
If pointing a gun at someone is a criminal offense why isn’t Grosskruetz charged when he pointed at Kyle.
Posted on 11/15/21 at 9:44 am to ShockTroop
quote:
If pointing a gun at someone is a criminal offense why isn’t Grosskruetz charged when he pointed at Kyle.
Posted on 11/15/21 at 9:45 am to MFn GIMP
And the State failed. However obvious things you can never tell how people will rule. Minor with a weapon is pretty cut a dry. The question is will the jury bypass all that crap when they find him not guilty of murder when the prosecutions witness admitted it was self-defense.
Page 2 of 64
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News