- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Kier Starmer should hang for his crimes.
Posted on 1/7/25 at 12:58 pm to omegaman66
Posted on 1/7/25 at 12:58 pm to omegaman66
quote:
He didn't answer the question... again.
I am not Fanni Willis
2
Posted on 1/7/25 at 1:00 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:But you sure enjoyed the work her and her boy toy did.
I am not Fanni Willis
Posted on 1/7/25 at 1:00 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
I am not Fanni Willis
Wow! 440,714 posts! What a fricking loser.
Posted on 1/7/25 at 1:00 pm to tide06
They want the population to be dumb, animals, and controllable. Jab takers are a prime example.
Have the 3rd world take over and then yea.
Make a movie out of it.
Have the 3rd world take over and then yea.
Make a movie out of it.
Posted on 1/7/25 at 1:05 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
In this same thread, there are multiple made up allegations that I'm a "pedo defender" arising from other incidents.
That was the purpose of the question within the context you described. I've said this was a terrible incident ITT already, and that all pedophillia is bad (which would cover this crisis within the comment).
quote:
Look to the posters throwing made up allegations at me and you'll likely find your answers. Here is an example ITT
People tend to get upset when I call their fantasies, fantasies, and then try to spin their silliness into irrational interpretations against me. So by me calling their fake pedo fantasies fake, they then "interpret" that as me defending pedos. Yes, it makes no sense when you explain it with context, but irrational types dont' often make sense.
Hence, my question.
You continuously try to change the subject. Often, you make it about yourself. And you often do that without addressing the subject.
People are attaching motive to your behavior.
Stick to the topic and you’ll get less of it.
Your need to always make it about you is a serious deficiency.
Posted on 1/7/25 at 1:10 pm to moneyg
quote:
People are attaching motive to your behavior.
They like "interpreting" with a strong bias towards labeling me an out-group participant.
It's a shaming ritual to keep people in line.
quote:
Stick to the topic and you’ll get less of it.
I have posted about this topic.
I started by calling out Vox for taking this off topic (with his fantasy silliness) and people melted about that. Apply the standards you project to me to others guilty of the "crimes"
Posted on 1/7/25 at 1:33 pm to SlowFlowPro
Psychopath.
Posted on 1/7/25 at 1:56 pm to Houag80
Every thread involving the P word, there's SFP, like flies on honey, and he just can't help himself, always dying on the hill to defend and fall on his sword for child rapists.
This post was edited on 1/7/25 at 1:57 pm
Posted on 1/7/25 at 2:05 pm to burger bearcat
quote:
Every thread involving the P word, there's SFP, like flies on honey, and he just can't help himself, always dying on the hill to defend and fall on his sword for child rapists.
Is promoting fake stories of children being exploited acceptable to you?
Posted on 1/7/25 at 3:08 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
The fact you have invented this in your head is the actual disturbing part.
4 downvotes against you says otherwise.
Yes. Many of here think you are involved in pedo activities given your proclivity to always appear in these threads and defend the activities - it's been ongoing for years and is very disturbing
You need help
Posted on 1/7/25 at 3:08 pm to dafif
quote:
Many of here think you are involved in pedo activities given your proclivity to always appear in these threads and defend the activities
Never has happened
Is promoting fake stories of children being exploited acceptable to you?
Posted on 1/7/25 at 3:16 pm to Paddyshack
I believe that Ray Epps was an asswipe that talked a good game on Jan.5 but lost his balls on Jan.6....just like 99% of the MAGA posters here and on other boards.
Posted on 1/7/25 at 3:44 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
Is promoting fake stories of children being exploited acceptable to you?
Are you saying these paki rape gang stories are fake?
Posted on 1/7/25 at 3:47 pm to djsdawg
quote:
Are you saying these paki rape gang stories are fake?
Again, he knows they are true ... connect the dots
Posted on 1/7/25 at 3:49 pm to djsdawg
quote:
Are you saying these paki rape gang stories are fake?
No.
Why is logic so difficult for you?
Posted on 1/7/25 at 3:50 pm to dafif
quote:
Again, he knows they are true
I've stated they are multiple times in this thread. Never said otherwise, over the past 10 years of this story being discussed.
quote:
connect the dots
Is promoting fake stories of children being exploited acceptable to you?
Posted on 1/7/25 at 4:03 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
No
Ok, so you believe these horrific stories.
quote:
Why is logic so difficult for you?
What are we applying logic to?
Posted on 1/7/25 at 4:05 pm to djsdawg
quote:
Ok, so you believe these horrific stories.
Of course, as stated previously, prior to people with weird fantasies flooded the thread with their lies.
quote:
It's really bad. We discussed it in great detail 10 years ago on here.
Rotherham child sexual exploitation scandal
quote:
What are we applying logic to?
You jumped to a very illlogical conclusion.
Posted on 1/7/25 at 4:16 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
You jumped to a very illlogical conclusion.
No, but I asked for clarity to ensure I didn’t jump to an illogical conclusion.
Posted on 1/7/25 at 5:52 pm to Stinger_1066
Maybe you missed the video I posted above, but the British Empire issues are their own, but aside from their former territories or commonwealth nations, lands, etc... I'm speaking more to the N. Africa, Middle East countries which were NOT part of the 'Empire' proper.
And I get it, if England is "ok" with a flood of foreigners coming in who don't share any common culture, language or history, they're free to call them 'legal', but for all intents and purposes, it's a time bomb ready to go off. And as stated way back in 1971, they KNEW this was going to happen, yet did nothing.
Might be 'legal' on the books, but it's unconscionable they allowed it.
And I get it, if England is "ok" with a flood of foreigners coming in who don't share any common culture, language or history, they're free to call them 'legal', but for all intents and purposes, it's a time bomb ready to go off. And as stated way back in 1971, they KNEW this was going to happen, yet did nothing.
Might be 'legal' on the books, but it's unconscionable they allowed it.
Page 9 of 10
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News