- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
0
Posted on 9/25/19 at 10:01 am to 9th life
quote:
Key detail: the transcript or summary is not at issue. the whistle blower complaint is.
This is great. The best are the liberals on Twitter who are claiming this "isn't a transcript" but somehow think the whistleblower complaint will be somehow more reliable even though it is based on conversations the whistleblower overheard from people who wrote this transcript.
Posted on 9/25/19 at 10:02 am to Midget Death Squad
Here's a dollar Midget, you can put it in 9th lifes thong when he's on stage !!
Posted on 9/25/19 at 10:04 am to 9th life
quote:The whistleblower who heard something from someone who heard something? Hearsay takes precedence over a transcript?
the whistle blower complaint is.
Posted on 9/25/19 at 10:07 am to NC_Tigah
quote:
The whistleblower who heard something from someone who heard something? Hearsay takes precedence over a transcript?
His whole point hinges on the fact that the whistleblowers complaint wasn't dealt with (in his mind) legally. Not that the content was of any value.
He wants the administration dealt with for not following the letter of the law on it's handling of the whistleblowers account.
Despite the fact that nothing in the law requires ALL "whistleblower" accounts to be considered and protected under the law. I'm sure something has to give the complaints credibility before the law protects them.
Posted on 9/25/19 at 10:08 am to 9th life
quote:
Key detail: the transcript or summary is not at issue. the whistle blower complaint is.
And there it is
Everything I said about you yesterday proven true in one post
Posted on 9/25/19 at 10:09 am to 9th life
quote:
im not grasping at straws. that has been and remains to be what is at issue. the admin is under no obligation to release a transcript of a call to the house committee. the admin is obliged to release complaint within 7 days.
Wrong BTK 9th Victim.
The 7 day rule only applies if the Intelligence Community Whistleblower Protection Act applies- and that act only applies to employees within the IC. And because the president is not a member of the intelligence community, and because this call did not involve an intelligence matter, as even the NYT conceded, the 7 day rule of the ICWPA does not apply.
This post was edited on 9/25/19 at 10:16 am
Posted on 9/25/19 at 10:10 am to PhDoogan
I mean. It's not like I predicted 9th would do exactly this or anything.
Posted on 9/25/19 at 10:11 am to 9th life
quote:
Key detail: the transcript or summary is not at issue. the whistle blower complaint is.
Bless your heart.
Posted on 9/25/19 at 10:12 am to 9th life
quote:
Key detail: the transcript or summary is not at issue. the whistle blower complaint is.
Text book goal post move....Do they have some kind of class that all commie Dems go to in order to learn this move? You all do it with such precision.
I mean...screw the fact there is Biden illegalities here...we're going to pretend that isn't there like whistling past a graveyard, right?
Posted on 9/25/19 at 10:14 am to 9th life
quote:
the whistle blower complaint is.
Yeah, the whistle blower complaint will say "Orange Man Bad mentioned Biden's corruption to another country's POTUS and that isn't fair..."
You people should just go ahead and off yourselves, you will not survive another four years... Think of the climate benefits...
Posted on 9/25/19 at 10:15 am to 9th life
quote:
Key detail: the transcript or summary is not at issue. the whistle blower complaint is.
Key detail, unless one of the whistleblowers was one of the 4-5 guys in the situation room, the complaint is completely meaningless, and if there are any hearings with this person we should demand a refund of our tax dollars.
You don't deal in 3rd hand information from someone who was not present and was not privy to the transcript. He did not listen in, he did not form the transcript and did not read it until ostensibly an hour ago. He's in effect Alex "frickin" Jones.
Posted on 9/25/19 at 10:17 am to TigerB8
From the DOJs legal opinion regarding this complaint
So now, because it does not meet the standard, why do you want it to be forwarded to the committee anyways unless it is purely for political theater? Once again it just shows that this has nothing to do with protecting a whistle blower and instead is just trying to build political chaos because OMB.
quote:
A complaint from an intelligence-community employee about statements made by the President during a telephone call with a foreign leader does not involve an “urgent concern,” as defined in 50 U.S.C. § 3033(k)(5)(G), because the alleged conduct does not relate to “the funding, administration, or operation of an intelligence activity” under the authority of the Director of National Intelligence. As a result, the statute does not require the Director to transmit the complaint to the congressional intelligence committees.
So now, because it does not meet the standard, why do you want it to be forwarded to the committee anyways unless it is purely for political theater? Once again it just shows that this has nothing to do with protecting a whistle blower and instead is just trying to build political chaos because OMB.
Posted on 9/25/19 at 10:18 am to PhDoogan
quote:
did not involve an intelligence matter
At best this would be a DOS matter
Posted on 9/25/19 at 10:19 am to 9th life
quote:they already said they would release the complaint (probably to show how nuts this all is). Also, what law do think requires the executive branch to release this to Congress?
Then bring the complaint forward to the appropriate committee, as the law requires
Posted on 9/25/19 at 10:20 am to ShortyRob
quote:
I mean. It's not like I predicted 9th would do exactly this or anything.
What am i doing exactly, rob?
you going to tell me, or stand on the shoulders of smarter posters so they can explain it for you?
Posted on 9/25/19 at 10:20 am to ShortyRob
quote:
And there it is
Everything I said about you yesterday proven true in one post
The whistleblower dossier
Posted on 9/25/19 at 10:21 am to 9th life
quote:
What am i doing exactly, rob?
I picture you red faced, talking with a lisp while you are typing this...
Bless your retarded little heart...
Posted on 9/25/19 at 10:21 am to SidewalkDawg
quote:They did follow letter of the law.
He wants the administration dealt with for not following the letter of the law on it's handling of the whistleblowers account.
Posted on 9/25/19 at 10:24 am to 9th life
quote:
9th life
How do people like you tie their own shoes in the morning with out help? SMDH
Page 4 of 5
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News